On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 11:33:40AM -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
>
>
> theUser BL wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Can anybody at Harmony say, whats the releationship (or
> > non-releationship) to GNU Classpath is?
>
> There is no official relationship, but
Dalibor Topic wrote:
>
> As much as I appreciate people trying to get yet another discussion going,
> it's all already said in the archives, so there is little need to keep
> bringing up the subject on either GNU Classpath or Harmony lists. :)
>
> The story of opening J2EE shows that one can a
On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 04:52:14PM +0200, David Tanzer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Cool, one of the easy questions again ;)
>
> Ok, first of all, Mark Wielaard has written an interesting article on
> LWN about the status of GNU Classpath which also discusses the
> relationship to HY from his point of view
theUser BL wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Can anybody at Harmony say, whats the releationship (or
> non-releationship) to GNU Classpath is?
There is no official relationship, but there's lots of awareness and
chatter. It's not as strong/robust/whatever as I'd like, and it'
Hi!
Cool, one of the easy questions again ;)
Ok, first of all, Mark Wielaard has written an interesting article on
LWN about the status of GNU Classpath which also discusses the
relationship to HY from his point of view:
http://lwn.net/Articles/184967/
Of course Dalibor's article is great too
Hi!
Can anybody at Harmony say, whats the releationship (or non-releationship)
to GNU Classpath is?
At the beginning of Apache Harmony it sounds, that Harmony would use GNU
Classpath for its class libraries.
But since Intel have spend Harmony its own Swing implementation, it is
clear
