.apache.org
>
>
> To
> harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
> cc
>
> Subject
> Re: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi George,
>
> Thanks for your clarifications
>
> Could you please try setting 'printAllowed' to false in th
est regards,
George
George C. Harley
Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
16/01/2006 12:27
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
cc
Subject
Re: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
Hi George,
remember a while back on
> >>another project that I knew the timings of things on my machine just
> >>from practice, and I could tell when we changed something that impacted
> >>performance, because the tests ran longer. This helped catch problems
> >>early.
> >>
ests ran longer. This helped catch problems
early.
geir
Thanks,
Mikhail Loenko
Intel Middleware Products Division
-Original Message-
From: George Harley1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:24 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unit test c
__
> George C. Harley
>
>
>
>
>
> "Loenko, Mikhail Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 16/01/2006 04:42
> Please respond to
> harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>
>
> To
>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
>
g that impacted
>>performance, because the tests ran longer. This helped catch problems
>>early.
>>
>>geir
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thanks,
>>>Mikhail Loenko
>>>Intel Middleware Products Division
>>>
>>>
>>>>-
s,
George
George C. Harley
"Loenko, Mikhail Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
16/01/2006 04:42
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
Hi George
We will remove all the tests and these QA guys will never disturb us :)
E
, because the tests ran longer. This helped catch problems
> early.
>
> geir
>
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mikhail Loenko
> > Intel Middleware Products Division
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: George Harley1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROT
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:24 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
Hi Mikhail,
Thanks for your very complete answer.
At some point we had different functionality in the
PerformanceTest but it seems to have died now. That is
George Harley1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 7:24 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
>
>Hi Mikhail,
>
>Thanks for your very complete answer.
>
>> At some point we had different functionality in
"Loenko, Mikhail Y" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
13/01/2006 12:12
Please respond to
harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To
cc
Subject
RE: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
As far as we did not have special performance tests, we used unit tests
to measure performance, i.e. to compare perform
ucts Division
>-Original Message-
>From: George Harley1 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:05 PM
>To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: Unit test code in HARMONY-16
>
>Hi,
>
>I have been looking into running the JUnit tests i
Hi,
I have been looking into running the JUnit tests included in HARMONY-16 in
my private sandbox. From what I have seen so far most (all ?) of the test
cases inherit from a base class PerformanceTest in the
com.openintel.drl.security.test package. What is the purpose of this base
class ?
B
13 matches
Mail list logo
