Would I be correct in assuming that the majority of java.sql would be
trivial to implement by reading the javadocs (everything except
DriverManager)? I can take a whack at the low hanging fruit this
weekend.
Jeremy
On 10-Feb-06, at 12:05 PM, zoe slattery wrote:
Upayavira wrote:
zoe slattery wrote:
OK - well - here is a plan.....
I have these scripts in a "hacked together" state and they currently
rely on reading the output from -verbose:class generated by an
IBM JRE.
Ideally I'd like them to be able to read a couple of different
formats.
If anyone is interested in knowing if their app would (in
theory) run
using Harmony classes open a JIRA called "Would $my_favourite_app
run on
Harmony?" and attach the output from "java -verbose:class
$my_favourite_app". If this works I can pick up the output and
use it to
test the tool. Please would you also attach the output from "java
-version"? I will append (or ask someone to append) a list of
missing
files to the JIRA.
When I'm happy that my scripts work and I've tidied up the code I'll
attach the source as a JIRA and write some instructions on how to
use it.
FWIW in looking at Derby, it looks as though we still need SQL
(could
have predicted that I suppose) and JNDI, but those seem to be all
that
are missing. I can send the list of missing classes to anyone that
wants to verify this - it's just slightly too long to paste into
mail
Paste it on the wiki (wiki.apache.org/harmony/). I'd be curious to
see it.
Done - at the end of Tim's Apache Derby page: http://
wiki.apache.org/harmony/Apache_Derby
Upayavira
