On 8/10/06, Jared Updike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[..]
http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~lordkaos/calc.cgi
(source available here http://www.ugcs.caltech.edu/~lordkaos/calc.tar.gz)
I've only recently joined this mailing list, and there seems to be a
considerable amount of talk about Haskell and
Hi folks,
I've been trying to compile a new ia64 port. I've cross-compiled an
unregisterised compiler that generated working binaries the first time it
was built, which was a pleasant experience. But I ran into issues with the
registerised build. The mangler is choking on floating-point spi
|> It seems you might benefit from local functional dependencies, which
|> are asserted per instance rather than for the whole class. They are
|> explained in
|>
|> http://pobox.com/~oleg/ftp/Haskell/typecast.html
Unfortunately I come crawling back with a failure. Either my fu was
not str
J. Garrett Morris wrote:
The ghc flag -fwarn-incomplete-patterns might be what you're looking for.
Donald Bruce Stewart wrote:
> You might just want to always use:
> -Wall -Werror
Thanks, I should have read the manual...
Jens
___
Haskell-Cafe m
This would require to:
- Retarget one of the existing Haskell compilers to generate JavaScript
(other possible targets would be Flash or higher level UI languages such as
OpenLaszlo that in turn compiles down to either Flash or JavaScript/HTML)
As I've noticed from experience, you can just writ
It seems irony gets lost so easily in these conversations. You have no
way of knowing what the state of haskell would have been had certainkey contributors to GHC and Haskell not taken jobs at Microsoft.Therefore you statement is meaningless and only good for producingapproving nods among people wh
robdockins:
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Albert Lai wrote:
>
> >"Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> >>Also, the bottom line imho is that Haskell is a difficult language to
> >>understand, and this is compounded by the apparent cleverness of
> >>unreadable code like:
> >>
> >> c =
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006, Johan Tibell wrote:
> The HWS - With Plugins tarball is unavailable at the author's website
> (http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/hws-wp/) and his email address
> doesn't work so this is desperate attempt to reach him. So, Martin
> Sjögren, are you here somewhere?
I tried t
On Aug 9, 2006, at 5:27 AM, Johan Grönqvist wrote:
Hi,
I have a question:
Short version: If I want to hide the implementation of a data-type
"Stack a" from the rest of the program, do I need to put its
definition in a separate file?
This is the usual way, as you've probably gathered.
On Aug 8, 2006, at 5:36 PM, Albert Lai wrote:
"Brian Hulley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Also, the bottom line imho is that Haskell is a difficult language to
understand, and this is compounded by the apparent cleverness of
unreadable code like:
c = (.) . (.)
when a normal person would
2006/8/9, Pasqualino 'Titto' Assini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,Those among you who have an interest in AJAX-style web development - that isto say the development of web applications that run entirely into thebrowser environment, calling back to the server back-end only to get raw
data -- will probably
Hi,
Those among you who have an interest in AJAX-style web
development – that is to say the development of web applications that run
entirely into the browser environment, calling back to the server back-end only
to get raw data -- will probably have noticed the recent appearance of the
"Reilly Hayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:42 AM, Immanuel Litzroth wrote:
>
>
> "Reilly Hayes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>
> I don't understand your argument. How exactly does the GPL get in the
> way of selling software as an instantiation of business
Hi,
I have a question:
Short version: If I want to hide the implementation of a data-type
"Stack a" from the rest of the program, do I need to put its definition
in a separate file?
Long version:
I want to use a stack, and I might implement it as a list, but I want to
hide the implementa
14 matches
Mail list logo
