On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Dominique Devriese
wrote:
> 2012/6/27 Tillmann Rendel :
>> How would you implement this requirement in Haskell without changing the
>> line "amount (Leaf x) = x"?
>
> I may be missing the point here, but having worked on large code bases
> with a wide variety contr
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 6:19 PM, Tillmann Rendel
wrote:
> How would you implement this requirement in Haskell without changing the
> line "amount (Leaf x) = x"?
The hflags library [http://hackage.haskell.org/package/hflags] seems
to do that, however...
> (I actually see three ways of doing this
Actually, using cast seems to be a perfect solution here. I can't see anything
wrong with it.
Отправлено с iPad
03.07.2012, в 20:33, Corentin Dupont написал(а):
> Hi all,
> I read somewhere (here:
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2300275/how-to-unpack-a-haskell-existential-type)
> that i
(This is intended as a simplification of the problem I actually need to
solve.)
I'm trying to implement the lambda calculus (with CBV evaluation) using the
"syntactic" package, in such a way that a simple extension is also simple
to implement.
I am stuck on the fact that it seems that the Value t
Call for Talks
ACM SIGPLAN Haskell Implementors' Workshop
http://haskell.org/haskellwiki/HaskellImplementorsWorkshop/2012
Copenhagen, Denmark, September 14th, 2012
The workshop will be held in conjunction with ICFP 2012
Hi,
This had never happened to me. And I have no idea what to do.
$ cabal --upgrade-dependencies --enable-documentation
--force-reinstalls --solver=topdown QuickCheck-2.5
Test/QuickCheck/All.hs:15:1:
Bad interface file:
/home/magicloud/.cabal/lib/template-haskell-2.6.0.0/ghc-7.4.2/Language/H
