In 0.4, Source technically has a Monad instance, but it's not really
useful in the same way the instance Aristid is referring to. In order
to get that instance, we would need to introduce a newtype wrapper.
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Paul Liu wrote:
> Thanks! I failed to notice this instance
Thanks! I failed to notice this instance declaration in the document.
But I'm still curious as to whether a Monad instance for Source makes
any sense, since in 4.0 all of Source/Conduit/Sink would share the
same implementation.
Regards,
Paul Liu
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 6:25 PM, yi huang wrote:
>
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 4:48 AM, Paul Liu wrote:
> Is there any follow up on this?
>
> I was wondering what is the best way to sequence a number of sources
> together. Anybody gave a further thought on this?
>
I believe sequence sources together can already be done by `Monoid`
instance.
>
> Reg
Is there any follow up on this?
I was wondering what is the best way to sequence a number of sources
together. Anybody gave a further thought on this?
Regards,
Paul Liu
On Tue, Dec 27, 2011 at 3:45 PM, Aristid Breitkreuz
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As you may have noticed, Michael Snoyman has been wor
Hi all,
As you may have noticed, Michael Snoyman has been working on an
alternative approach to I/O, called conduits. You can find it here:
https://github.com/snoyberg/conduit
When looking at the Source type (explained here:
http://www.yesodweb.com/blog/2011/12/conduits), I noticed that they
see
