g9ks157k:
> Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2009 16:59 schrieb Brent Yorgey:
> > On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
> > > > Get a community.haskell.org account once you are ready to start a
> > > > repo, it
Am Samstag, 14. Februar 2009 16:59 schrieb Brent Yorgey:
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
> > > Get a community.haskell.org account once you are ready to start a
> > > repo, it can not only host y
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Wolfgang Jeltsch wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
> > Daniel Kraft asked:
> > > That sounds interesting... What do you mean by "no canonical" library?
> > > Are there already ones but just no "standard" one? But in
Am Donnerstag, 12. Februar 2009 15:34 schrieb Thomas DuBuisson:
> Daniel Kraft asked:
> > That sounds interesting... What do you mean by "no canonical" library?
> > Are there already ones but just no "standard" one? But in this case, I
> > don't think adding yet another one will help :D Or isn'
Daniel Kraft asked:
> That sounds interesting... What do you mean by "no canonical" library? Are
> there already ones but just no "standard" one? But in this case, I don't
> think adding yet another one will help :D Or isn't there a "real" general
> graph library?
My impression is that there is
Don Stewart wrote:
- Graphs.
True graphs (the data structure) are still a weak point! There's no
canonical graph library for Haskell.
That sounds interesting... What do you mean by "no canonical" library?
Are there already ones but just no "standard" one? But in this case,
I don't think
