Hi Arthur,
> Le 15 sept. 2022 à 23:11, Arthur Schwarz a écrit :
>
> Hi Akim;
>
> You seem to be the go-to person for Harsh and Unremitting Criticism; sorry.
I don't know how to read your sentence :) It's ambiguous to me. But reports
are welcome. You made many of them, unfortunately during
Hi Akim;
You seem to be the go-to person for Harsh and Unremitting Criticism;
sorry. When you get tired of it all just say "I'm tired of it all, no
more" and that'll be the end of it.
What is being said is that the User's Manual is incomplete in that it
doesn't give a full description of the
Hi Arthur,
> Le 8 juin 2022 à 19:07, slipbits a écrit :
>
> In 3.4.6 Actions the format of a name, as in RULE[name], not mentioned nor is
> the scope of the name, nor any constraint. For purposes of this discussion we
> define EBNF tag as the RULE name.
This is wrong. First, it's not about r
In 3.4.6 Actions the format of a name, as in RULE[name}, not mentioned
nor is the scope of the name, nor any constraint. For purposes of this
discussion we define EBNF tag as the RULE name. Am I correct in assuming
that:
1. A EBNF tag is composed of alphabetic, numeric characters and a dash
