Thanks for the great responses so far.
I did forget to mention we average about 700 blocks/day and have 12
pathologists.
Two are Hem. Path and two are Derm. Path.
That leaves 8 to divide the rest, not taking into consideration tumor
conferences, vacations and such.
Currently the work is divided
Histonetters,
I have been asked to find out how other institutions divide up cases to be
given to your pathologists.
We give the Hem. Path. and the Derm. Path their respective cases.
So, how do you divide up the rest?
Currently, we divide them with one pathologist getting the odd numbered cases
Hello All
Can anyone worked on Sure path system and Thin prep system as Liquid based
Cytology give me their feedback as in which system is better and why?
Thanks in advance
Nice weekend
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://l
Hi Karen,
We utilize Cerner Pathnet too. Unfortunately, reporting from the system isn't
easy, or at least it isn't for us. We are currently stuck with Discern
Analytics (not the 2.0 version), which can provide you the number of these
charges and potentially the types of IHCs you performed but
My service/field technician said the Ultra LCS is required for the IHC, not
sure why but that’s what I was told.
Curt
From: Allan Wang [mailto:alla...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2017 9:21 AM
To: Curt
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] benchmark ultra bulks
The PreservCyt solution is absolutely the culprit. The methanol and ethanol in
that solution causes the cells to shrink and round up, thus creating your
issues of them falling off during your staining protocol. The PreservCyt does
a great job when utilized on the ThinPrep processor but not for
The LCS is fairly cheap in comparison to some other bulks and 650-010 is
half the price of 650-210. I don't know if there's actually any difference
between them.
I think an alternate formulation for EZ Prep (or Discovery Wash), CC1 and
especially CC2 would save more money.
Allan
On Fri, Nov 3, 2
So like everyone else, I'm always trying to find new ways to save a few
dollars, technology and costs are always increasing while reimbursements are
always decreasing...
With that, does anyone have any thoughts on alternative bulks to what Roche
sells for the benchmark ultra, I'm thinking an alt
Hey Joe,
All the specimens come to the lab fresh. Instead of the Cytospin collection
fluid we have been using thin prep preservcyt solution to resuspend, which is
mostly methyl alcohol. Do you think that would have some influence to the
washing problem. We are staining with the PAP stain.
We use spinal cord.
-Original Message-
From: Diane Satterfield via Histonet [histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Received: Friday, 03 Nov 2017, 7:39AM
To: 'histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu' [histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu]
Subject: [Histonet] LFB-H&E controls (EXTERNAL EMAIL)
I am gett
I am getting ready to learn how to do the LFB-H&E staining on brain tissue. I
was wondering want I would use for a control with this staining.
Diane
___
Histonet mailing list
Histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
http://lists.utsouthwestern.edu/mailman/lis
Good day colleagues,
We are occasionally being asked to do an acid-fast stain (Ziehl-Neelsen) on
a alcohol-fixed cytospin preparation from a cytology fluid.
Typically in Cytology, if a specimen is very bloody, we will add acetic
acid to lyse the red cells. Does anyone know if acetic acid would hav
12 matches
Mail list logo