RE: [Histonet] 2014 IHC CPT coding

2013-12-10 Thread Tapper, Sheila J.
013 4:42 PM To: Drew Meyer Cc: Histonet; Cartun,Richard Subject: Re: [Histonet] 2014 IHC CPT coding Yes, we are trying to wrap our heads around this one. 24% drop for the first IHC stain done on a specimen and 41% for each one following. This will hit our IHC department hard. Perhaps even will

Re: [Histonet] 2014 IHC CPT coding

2013-12-10 Thread Patrick Laurie
Yes, we are trying to wrap our heads around this one. 24% drop for the first IHC stain done on a specimen and 41% for each one following. This will hit our IHC department hard. Perhaps even will hurt patient care. At least the 88360 came out unscathed. Patrick Laurie Celligent Diagnostics On

Re: [Histonet] 2014 IHC CPT coding

2013-12-10 Thread Drew Meyer
This is from the CAP site... and here's the link: http://www.cap.org/apps/cap.portal?_nfpb=true&cntvwrPtlt_actionOverride=/portlets/contentViewer/show&_windowLabel=cntvwrPtlt&cntvwrPtlt%7BactionForm.contentReference%7D=statline/index.html&_state=maximized&_pageLabel=cntvwr *Immunohistochemistry:

Re: [Histonet] 2014 IHC CPT coding

2013-12-10 Thread Kim Donadio
I got information they got rid of 88342 all together and added G codes. One for the 1st slide stained and another for each additional stain. Can anyone verify and give a link? Sent from my iPhone On Dec 10, 2013, at 4:33 PM, "Cartun, Richard" wrote: > My understanding is that 88342 is used

[Histonet] 2014 IHC CPT coding

2013-12-10 Thread Cartun, Richard
My understanding is that 88342 is used for the first IHC antibody, then 88343 is used for each subsequent antibody (per specimen part). Is that correct? Thank you. Richard Richard W. Cartun, MS, PhD Director, Histology & Immunopathology Director, Biospecimen Collection Programs Assista