hanol.
Maxim Peshkov,
Russia,
Taganrog.
Original message---
From: "Johnson, Kevin"
To: "'histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu'"
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject: [Histonet] Could these samples have been saved?
Dear all,
During an overnight tissue processing
You are right. You should have tried to rehydrate the tissues, especially mouse
that is very lean in itself.
You cannot unmummify them now.
René J.
From: "Johnson, Kevin"
To: "'histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu'"
Sent: Friday, February 8, 2013 1:00 PM
Subject:
are made this pretty easy to do. Does anyone know
differently?
Joelle Weaver MAOM, HTL (ASCP) QIHC
> Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2013 13:22:15 -0500
> From: kgrob...@rci.rutgers.edu
> To: kjohn...@med.miami.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Could these samples have been saved?
> CC: histonet@li
I don't know about your samples now, but for future reference, you might
find this interesting:
http://realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/Data/Study_mummified_soft_tissues.htm
Kathleen Roberts
Principal Lab Technician
Neurotoxicology Labs
Molecular Pathology Facility Core
Dept of Pharma
We microwave process our tissues, and we've had tissues fall out of the rack
after the dehydration phases and air dry in the open retort for hours. We did
not continue with processing; we added them to formalin for eight hours (which
could be overkill) and then started the processing from the be
Dear all,
During an overnight tissue processing cycle, a malfunction occurred such that
the sample basket was suspended in mid-air for several hours at probably the
worst spot in which to do so---after the final absolute ethanol of the
dehydration series. I continued the process manually in the