western.edu] On Behalf Of Duddey,
> Aimee
> Sent: Thursday, April 24, 2014 7:29 AM
> To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: [Histonet] I need opinions on Leica instruments
>
> I am considering the Peloris II tissue processor and the Bond IHC
> stainer for our lab. We
We have the Peloris II and VIP processors, as well as Ventana.We are happy with
the Peloris. It processes fatty tissue very well. The versatility with 2
retorts in one machine has allowed us to have several different processing
times based on tissue size. We did have a learning curve with the Pe
We have a Bond III and Bond Max, both very reliable and easy to use...No bad
experience to report with either in the past two years.
>>> "Duddey, Aimee" 4/24/2014 6:28 AM >>>
I am considering the Peloris II tissue processor and the Bond IHC stainer for
our lab. We are a 400 bed regional ho
Leica!
Sent from the iPhone of Kim Tournear 🇺🇸 😃
On Apr 24, 2014, at 4:28 AM, "Duddey, Aimee" wrote:
> I am considering the Peloris II tissue processor and the Bond IHC stainer for
> our lab. We are a 400 bed regional hospital with a growing outreach
> business. We have had Thermo Excel
Subject: [Histonet] I need opinions on Leica instruments
I am considering the Peloris II tissue processor and the Bond IHC
stainer for our lab. We are a 400 bed regional hospital with a growing
outreach business. We have had Thermo Excelsior processor for years and
have never really been happy with
I am considering the Peloris II tissue processor and the Bond IHC stainer for
our lab. We are a 400 bed regional hospital with a growing outreach business.
We have had Thermo Excelsior processor for years and have never really been
happy with it. Of course our VIP is as reliable and consisten
