Re: [Histonet] Pathology amended reports

2015-11-16 Thread histotech--- via Histonet
can lead to other errors. IB -Original Message- From: STEVEN PINHEIRO via Histonet [mailto:histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:33 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Pathology amended reports I realize this is a broad topic

Re: [Histonet] Pathology amended reports

2015-11-15 Thread ian bernard via Histonet
can lead to other errors. IB -Original Message- From: STEVEN PINHEIRO via Histonet [mailto:histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 10:33 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Pathology amended reports I realize this is a broad topic but

Re: [Histonet] Pathology amended reports

2015-10-28 Thread Victor via Histonet
you have any questions. Victor University of Washington Medical Center Seattle, WA Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From: STEVEN PINHEIRO via Histonet Sent: Wednesday, October 28, 2015 9:35 AM To: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu Subject: [Histonet] Pathology amended reports I realize this is

[Histonet] Pathology amended reports

2015-10-28 Thread STEVEN PINHEIRO via Histonet
I realize this is a broad topic but I am trying to get a flavor for best practices. When you issue an amended report, is the original 'removed'? Unlike the practice on the clinical lab side of leaving the first errant test result in place and issuing a corrected result, pathology (at least here)