/09, Merced M Leiker wrote:
From: Merced M Leiker
Subject: RE: [Histonet] the not-yet-mentioned benefit of plants in the lab
To: "Edwards, R.E." , "Cheryl" ,
histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Date: Monday, October 26, 2009, 12:07 PM
Hahaha...if you can create them with fil
---
> From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> [mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of Merced M
> Leiker Sent: 26 October 2009 15:49
> To: Cheryl; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] the not-yet-mentioned benefit of plants in the lab
>
> So there
-mentioned benefit of plants in the lab
So there seem to be 2 trains of thought Histoland regarding plants in the
lab:
1. Plants are GOOD for both physical and psychological health
2. Plants are BAD because they spread fungus and bacteria and allergens.
Swhy not include plants that are
Leiker
Sent: 26 October 2009 15:49
To: Cheryl; histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu
Subject: Re: [Histonet] the not-yet-mentioned benefit of plants in the lab
So there seem to be 2 trains of thought Histoland regarding plants in the
lab:
1. Plants are GOOD for both physical and psychological health
So there seem to be 2 trains of thought Histoland regarding plants in the
lab:
1. Plants are GOOD for both physical and psychological health
2. Plants are BAD because they spread fungus and bacteria and allergens.
Swhy not include plants that are the least allergenic while taking
measu
I just read of the plant drama for the lab getting a CAP Phase 1 ding. There
was a study done ages and ages ago and certain plants IMPROVE the air quality
in chemically contaminated environments. (If you have any measure of our
solvents in the air-your air is contaminated even if it is an allow
