com
To: chana.de.w...@gmail.com; jf...@gladstone.ucsf.edu
CC: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu; rosenfeld...@hotmail.com
Subject: Re: Re: [Histonet] Good Perfusion...
I think many, many labs perfuse
animals under deep anesthesia. Notice the word "DEEP". It is hard to judge
whether the animal
estern.edu
[mailto:histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu] On Behalf Of TF
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2009 11:46 PM
To: Chana de Wolf; jfish
Cc: histonet; JR R
Subject: Re: Re: [Histonet] Good Perfusion...
I think many, many labs perfuse animals under deep anesthesia. Notice the word
"DEEP&
Hey everyone...just thought I'd add an "official" word from the authorities
in this debate...as I'd been taught or somehow led to believe otherwise:
:-)
Forwarded Message
Date: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 11:19 AM -0400
From: IACUC
To: Merced M Leiker
Subject: RE: gener
7-01 03:42:30
收件人： jfish
抄送： histonet; JR R
主题： Re: [Histonet] Good Perfusion...
Histonetters,
Perfusion under deep anesthesia is most certainly not unethical NOR illegal,
and, in fact (as mentioned by Jo Dee), it is necessary for optimal perfusion
and fixation -- the intracellular ischemic c
let me say like this
during the overdose injection, look into the animals' eyes.
take their soul away. then the pre-mortem perfusion is humanized.
2009-07-01
TF
发件人： Chana de Wolf
发送时间： 2009-07-01 09:30:01
收件人： Ingles Claire
抄送： histonet
主题： Re: [Histonet] Good Perf
From: histonet-boun...@lists.utsouthwestern.edu on behalf of Chana de Wolf
> Sent: Tue 6/30/2009 2:37 PM
> To: jf...@gladstone.ucsf.edu
> Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu; JR R
> Subject: Re: [Histonet] Good Perfusion...
>
>
>
> Histonetters,
>
> Perfusion under deep anesthesia
f Chana de Wolf
Sent: Tue 6/30/2009 2:37 PM
To: jf...@gladstone.ucsf.edu
Cc: histonet@lists.utsouthwestern.edu; JR R
Subject: Re: [Histonet] Good Perfusion...
Histonetters,
Perfusion under deep anesthesia is most certainly not unethical NOR illegal,
and, in fact (as mentioned by Jo Dee), it is n
Histonetters,
Perfusion under deep anesthesia is most certainly not unethical NOR illegal,
and, in fact (as mentioned by Jo Dee), it is necessary for optimal perfusion
and fixation -- the intracellular ischemic cascade begins immediately upon
circulatory arrest, setting off a chain of events highl
Dear Jerry and histonetters,
I don't believe this is unethical or illegal. It is written into our IACUC
approved protocols as follows:
Chemical Method of Euthanasia: "Perfusion under general anesthesia, Avertin
or Halothane induced. Bilateral thoracotomy."
Could it only be forbidden by your f
