Re: assembler help!

In <14a2a.54bd6587.3b6d8...@aol.com>, on 08/05/2011 at 02:24 PM, Ed Finnell said: >What was the RAND fiasco at SHARE in SFO? They were giving out >PL/S tapes with the IBM doco. I almost made it back to the data >center before my beeper went off...BRING IT BACK NOW! That PL/S compiler[1] was

Re: assembler help!

In <6387394077152448.wa.paulgboulderaim@bama.ua.edu>, on 08/05/2011 at 05:44 PM, Paul Gilmartin said: >Or, was that the "SLAC Mods", the predecessor of Assembler H? No, the SLAC mods were modifications of Assembler H. Thanks, Greg. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT

Re: Not able to login to TSO

Hello, 1) I tried Ping 10.241.1.20 command. But there is response from this. 2) I tried checking status of TRLE member , and it is in active status. 22.20.21 D NET,TRL 22.20.22 STC31356 IST097I DISPLAY ACCEPTED 22.20.22 STC31356 IST350I DISPLAY TYPE = TRL IST924I

Re: Suffix of 64 bit instructions

In , on 08/05/2011 at 06:23 PM, Micheal Butz said: >A number of the 64 bit instruction Seem to have a constant in >the last Byte e.g. LG. 58 STG 50 would anyone know the >siginifcance of this It's part of the opcode, and not limited to "grandé" instructions. There have been extended opcodes

Re: Not able to login to TSO

In <695862350-1312576384-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-571022805-@b12.c1.bise6.blackberry>, on 08/05/2011 at 08:33 PM, Ted MacNEIL said: >And, there are arrogant PKB -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: assembler help!

In <4e3c500c.20...@ync.net>, on 08/05/2011 at 03:18 PM, Rick Fochtman said: >Are you thinking perhaps of PL/C, the WATFIV-like PL/1 processor from > Cornell U. ?? No; that's not in the PL/S family, and not from IBM. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: CORRUPT PDS - I/O ERROR

In <4e3ca3f5.1060...@bcs.org.uk>, on 08/06/2011 at 03:16 AM, CM Poncelet said: >Is it perhaps because you forget that Fortran I was around in 1955 >and the Lyons Electronic Office (LEO) was around in 1952? No, it's because you've made enough erroneous statements that you have no credibility.

Re: Not able to login to TSO

In <1312575574.2841.yahoomailclas...@web31812.mail.mud.yahoo.com>, on 08/05/2011 at 01:19 PM, Cris Hernandez #9 said: >When it comes to unix (or winders), I really don't mind being the >village idiot, because at least I know what I don't know, or at least >I thought so until I read this rant.

AUTO: Elmer E Latorre is out of the office (returning 08/15/2011)

I am out of the office until 08/15/2011. If there is a SEV 1 PDSE problem please contac Marc D Casad (Manager) or Lyle Merithew or Jerry Dearing (Developers). Any other issues please wait until my return. Thanks Note: This is an automated response to your message "IBM-MAIN Digest - 5 Aug 2011

SHARE Hotels Sold Out!

Wow! SHARE sold out its room allocation at the Dolphin. Overflow at the Swan also sold out. Some people are staying at an off-site hotel. Yikes! Glad I booked when I did... -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software International, Inc 831 Parkview Drive North El Segundo, CA 90245 310-338-0400 x318 edja

Re: migrating an in-house MF tool

Thanks I will definetly take your Inputs and read accordingly. On Sun, Aug 7, 2011 at 8:03 AM, john gilmore wrote: > The problem is not 1) that you post too often or 2) that you do not do > enough manual readinmg before you post. It is that you do not provide > enough circumstantial detail to e

migrating an in-house MF tool

The problem is not 1) that you post too often or 2) that you do not do enough manual readinmg before you post. It is that you do not provide enough circumstantial detail to enable us to be really helpful. Try describing your problems in [much] greater circumstantial detail. We all know how t

Re: Suffix of long-displacement instructions

At 16:20 -0400 on 08/06/2011, Bob Rutledge wrote about Re: Suffix of long-displacement instructions: Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: Bob, Thank you for your supporting voice and verification. I didn't see your reply until I had already replied to Tom. You're welcome. If the OP's question i

Re: Migrating a in house MF tool

Sure... I will try doing it and search manuals incase of any difficulties.. Post if i need the experts comment. On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 7:14 PM, Don Imbriale wrote: > If you know all the pieces that make up the tool and you have successfully > identified them and successfully transported them to

Re: Suffix of 64 bit instructions

On Sat, 6 Aug 2011 08:42:19 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote: >Tom Marchant wrote: >> >> You misread the chart. > >I really thought Peter had it right, but you made me look: > >E358 LOAD (32) LY >E304 LOAD (64) LG >E350 STORE (32) STY >E324 STORE (64) STG > Apologies to all. Peter indeed had it right

Re: Suffix of long-displacement instructions

Farley, Peter x23353 wrote: Bob, Thank you for your supporting voice and verification. I didn't see your reply until I had already replied to Tom. You're welcome. If the OP's question is restated with the right instructions, it might be of interest to peruse the instruction lists to see h

Re: Not able to login to TSO

Saurabh Please take your time, accuracy always trumps haste! Also, I see you have now subscribed to the IBMTCP-L list. It may be sensible to move the discussion there but I leave that up to you. We should try to deal with this problem in logical stages. > 4) When I tried connection TSO using 3

Re: Another DB2 question...SYSIBM.SYSPLANDEP...how is this updated

Dave, Is the DBRM bound into a plan, or is the DBRM bound into a PACKAGE, then the plan is bound with the PACKLIST parm? In the former case (which is no longer supported as of DB2 V10 btw) SYSPLANDEP will be updated when the BIND PLAN is performed. However, in the latter case, SYSPLANDEP will

Re: Suffix of 64 bit instructions

Bob, Thank you for your supporting voice and verification. I didn't see your reply until I had already replied to Tom. Peter -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Bob Rutledge Sent: Saturday, August 06, 2011 8:42 AM To: IBM-M

Re: Another DB2 question...SYSIBM.SYSPLANDEP...how is this updated

Basic DB2 structure - 1. very old DB2 - plans contained DBRM's - BIND PLAN MEMBER(list of DBRM's) - DBRM dependencies for these DBRM's are stored in SYSPLANDEP 2. new DB2 (last 15 years) - plans contain package list entries - BIND PLAN PKLIST(list of package names) No dependendies stored in SYSPL

Re: Suffix of 64 bit instructions

Tom, I beg to disagree with you. Here is a plain-text paste of the section of the latest PoOPs describing the LOAD instruction (page 7-213, 585 of 1496 in the PDF of the document): Register-and-storage formats: L R1,D2(X2,B2) [RX-a] '58' R1 X2 B2 D2 0 8 12 16 20 31 LY R1,D2(X2,B2) [RXY-a] 'E

Another DB2 question...SYSIBM.SYSPLANDEP...how is this updated

I can't find in any manual where it states how SYSIBM.SYSPLANDEP is updated. I made the assumption it would be done at BIND time. I have a DBRM that contains both dynamic and static SQL. This DBRM is bound into a plan. I can run the program and the SQL will execute successfully. However

Re: Not able to login to TSO

Hello, Sorry for delay in replying. There was some problem in my internet connection, so couldn't able to reply 1) We are running z/OS 1.7 under z/VM . 2) We recently moved our Mainframe to different data center. So this profile, which I had sent earlier was working at older data center.

Re: SQL help please....thanks

Mike and Norbert. Thanks for the help. have to re-work the source a bit, but am past the pre-compiler error. --Dave - Original Message - From: "Norbert Friemel" Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main To: Sent: Friday, August 05, 2011 6:23 PM Subject: Re: SQL help please On Fri

Re: Migrating a in house MF tool

If you know all the pieces that make up the tool and you have successfully identified them and successfully transported them to the new system, it's time to build the tool on the new system. If you have build instructions from the old system, those instructions may also work on the new system. If

Re: Suffix of 64 bit instructions

Tom Marchant wrote: On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 18:52:41 -0400, Farley, Peter wrote: LY instruction format from the Principles of Operations looks like: 'E3' R1 X2 B2 DL2 DH2 '58' You misread the chart. the above is LG, not LY STY instruction format from the Principles of Operations looks like:

Re: Migrating a in house MF tool

>Hi, > >We recently decommissioned a Z/OS 1.6 server. There was a requirement that a >tool which was developed under 1.6 needs to be migrated to the new LPAR Z/OS >1.12. Could you please guide me the required steps that needs to taken to >migrate the entire tool and invoke those panels in 1.12 vers

Re: I certainly was hacked

I spell it M$ or Micro$oft. On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 9:18 AM, J. D. Cassidy wrote: > Was the "MS" in capitals intentional? > > => The whole operation was very clever.  Two booby traps that I was > => apparently expected to find were backed up by a third; and I suspect that > => there is a trapdoor

AUTO: Ulrich Thiemann/Rochester/IBM is out-of-office (returning 08/12/2011)

I am out of the office until 08/12/2011. For urgent issues, please contact my manager David Watson. Note: This is an automated response to your message "Migrating a in house MF tool" sent on 8/5/2011 8:12:52 PM. This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.