--Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 10:02 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 2 LPARS Sharing 3494 ATL - Why does SY1 always update TCDB
?
Jack Kelly wrote:
> I'm probably going back too far (2-
List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 2 LPARS Sharing 3494 ATL - Why does SY1 always update TCDB
?
At 23:34 -0500 on 03/11/2007, Russell Witt wrote about Re: 2 LPARS
Sharing 3494 ATL - Why does SY1 a
At 23:34 -0500 on 03/11/2007, Russell Witt wrote about Re: 2 LPARS
Sharing 3494 ATL - Why does SY1 always update T:
So many years ago (5+ I believe) we changed the CBRUXENT sample
source so that a foreign tape was left in the "insert pending"
category (and therefore other systems would be poll
Jack Kelly wrote:
I'm probably going back too far (2-3 yrs) but the d/t 3494 would present
the insert to whichever system answered up first not all systems. From
what has been said, it appears that's changed?
3394 send "new cart inserted" to all attached (and IPLed) hosts.
Usually only one of
f foreign tapes.
Please contact CA-1 level-1 support for assitance on this.
Russell Witt
CA-1 Level-2 Support Manager
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2007 9:51 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject:
y: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
03/09/2007 10:23 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: 2 LPARS Sharing 3494 ATL - Why does SY1 always update TCDB ?
>
> I thinks it works slightly different: supposing both systems are fully
> se
I thinks it works slightly different: supposing both systems are fully
separated, the insertion of the tape is presented to both systems and
both CA-1's will check their TMC for the tape. If present they will
accept the tape and have the TCDB and LM updates.
I suspect the test-tapes are also def
"Pinnacle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>...
> Michael,
>
> This should work the way you've described. I know with RMM that each
system
> is notified, but the tape is given the cat codes of the system where
the
> tape is cataloged in the CDS. CA-1 should work the
ch 09, 2007 9:24 AM
Subject: 2 LPARS Sharing 3494 ATL - Why does SY1 always update TCDB ?
I have just initiated sharing of our 3494 tape robot across 2 LPARS
(Prod and Test).
There is no sharing between the 2 systems.
They have separate range of tapes, separate TCDB, separate CA1 TMC,
separate volum
9 matches
Mail list logo
