Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-10 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 01/09/2011 at 10:54 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: >There are publicly available manuals that provide the translation. No. There are publicly available manuals that list all of the available message formats for a given message number. Why should I play guessing games when the OP can supply

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-09 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 09:01:27 -0500 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" wrote: :>In , on 01/09/2011 :> at 11:44 AM, Binyamin Dissen said: :>>Pity that Shmuel didn't refer back to the original post :>AS I recall, the original post had only the message number, not the :>text. There are publicly availabl

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-09 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 01/09/2011 at 11:44 AM, Binyamin Dissen said: >Pity that Shmuel didn't refer back to the original post AS I recall, the original post had only the message number, not the text. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-09 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:52:06 -0600 Paul Gilmartin wrote: :>On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:34:34 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: :>>In , on 01/07/2011 :>> at 03:36 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: :>>>This issue is that the binder considers this kind of error to be :>>>merely a warning. :>>What kind of

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-08 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 17:34:34 -0500, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote: >In , on 01/07/2011 > at 03:36 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: > >>This issue is that the binder considers this kind of error to be >>merely a warning. > >What kind of error and why should it be more than a warning? > Why should it be

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-08 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 01/07/2011 at 03:36 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: >This issue is that the binder considers this kind of error to be >merely a warning. What kind of error and why should it be more than a warning? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT ISO position; see

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-07 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Lizette Koehler > > Great points. > > Unfortunately this is vendor code. So I will ask the vendor to change the RC > on the Lked. Arguably "better" to suggest the vendor fix the defective object module. -jc- -

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-07 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 08:11:58 -0500 "Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)" wrote: :>In , on 01/06/2011 :> at 11:02 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: :>>As it has a W suffix, the issue would be with the binder. :>Why? For both the Binder and the old Lnkage Editor, the GIGO rule :>applies. Do you have any reason to

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-07 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
In , on 01/06/2011 at 11:02 PM, Binyamin Dissen said: >As it has a W suffix, the issue would be with the binder. Why? For both the Binder and the old Lnkage Editor, the GIGO rule applies. Do you have any reason to believe that IEW2556W message was invalid? If the message is correct then the e

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-06 Thread Schwarz, Barry A
Subject: Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity Great points. Unfortunately this is vendor code. So I will ask the vendor to change the RC on the Lked. -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
Great points. Unfortunately this is vendor code. So I will ask the vendor to change the RC on the Lked. Lizette -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the mess

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-06 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:15:16 -0500 Lizette Koehler wrote: :>I had an issue where the LNKEDT part of SMPE (3.5) received an IEW2556W :>This message for me needed to be at a Severity 8 but it was a 4. So I did not see this error. :>Is there a way in SMPE to select specific messages and change th

Re: SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-06 Thread Mark Zelden
On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:15:16 -0500, Lizette Koehler wrote: >I had an issue where the LNKEDT part of SMPE (3.5) received an IEW2556W > >This message for me needed to be at a Severity 8 but it was a 4. So I did not see this error. Eh? > >Is there a way in SMPE to select specific messages and ch

SMPE 3.5 and Message Severity

2011-01-06 Thread Lizette Koehler
I had an issue where the LNKEDT part of SMPE (3.5) received an IEW2556W This message for me needed to be at a Severity 8 but it was a 4. So I did not see this error. Is there a way in SMPE to select specific messages and change their severity so the Apply processing would set NOGO? Or am I no