On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 11:27:50 -0400, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>On Thursday, 08/17/2006 at 09:39 EST, Brian Nielsen
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >It certainly affects the size of the HSA *IF* that particular IOCDS i
s
>> >marked to allow dynamic updates. If you don't specify MAXD
This is posted both in the vse and vm listservs.
We have a used 7060 for DR purposes. It has 3 FEA cards for IP
traffic, to be used by VM and VSE TCP/IP. The IOCDS entries are
copied from those for the FEA cards on our production 7060 and our
TCP/IP for VM configurations are copied from our
On Thursday, 08/17/2006 at 09:39 EST, Brian Nielsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >It certainly affects the size of the HSA *IF* that particular IOCDS is
> >marked to allow dynamic updates. If you don't specify MAXDEV=, it
> >defaults to the maximum number of devices allowed by the processor.
Tha
On Thu, 17 Aug 2006 10:03:51 -0400, Alan Altmark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
wrote:
>On Thursday, 08/17/2006 at 08:36 EST, Brian Nielsen
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That sounds like your HSA size was based on the actual defined devices
,
>> not the maximum that can be defined.
>>
>> This makes me que
On Thursday, 08/17/2006 at 08:36 EST, Brian Nielsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That sounds like your HSA size was based on the actual defined devices,
> not the maximum that can be defined.
>
> This makes me question the utility of the MAXDEVS parameter. Why would
I
> bother limiting the numb
That sounds like your HSA size was based on the actual defined devices,
not the maximum that can be defined.
This makes me question the utility of the MAXDEVS parameter. Why would I
bother limiting the number of devices if it has no effect on the HSA size
?
Brian Nielsen
On Wed, 16 Aug 200
