That is the way it is shipped from IBM.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nick Laflamme
Sent: Friday, September 15, 2006 3:24 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/vm 5.2 - new install - DIRMAINT not in CP directory
I wo
I wonder if the problem is as simple as DIRMAINT having a NOLOG
password? I have a very faint memory of an issue like that.
Just a thought,
Nick
I forgot about CMAP. I used it 10 years ago and Mike is right, it will
tell you probably more than you want to know. I also seem to remember
that it was something that needed to be done at the userid level. I
don't remember if it was kicked off by a command in the PROFILE EXEC or
just how it
Regarding DIRMAINT, in particular, as well as FTPSERVE and TCPIP, you
should not expect much to work in a newly restored VM system. You're
going to have to work your way thru the program directories that, I
assume, you received. Start with the base CP/CMS directory. For
DIRMAINT, the userid'
Hey David,
Jeff sends me files from his VM to my VM all the time so I know the
routes are correct for both directions. The problem is that the file
originated on the VSE system before going to my VM reader so VSE is
getting the messages, not my VM id.
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message
Solved. In the PROFILE TCPIP I uncommented only port 21. I had to do
that for port 20 as well. I should have paid more attention!
Thanks all for the feedbacks.
Original Message
Subject:FTPSERVE not working - z/VM 5.2
Date: Fri, 15 Sep 2006 09:17:17 -0700
From: Ranga
Colin,
Probably overkill for your needs... but useful information to stick in
your back pocket for later.
Macro 4 sells (barely, extremely poor marketing - can't find it on the
web site unless you know magic incantations) a product called VM/CMAP
(Command Monitor Analysis Product) that does a
Too bad I responded early. Now when I try to get directory listing in an
FTP session, I get this error:
09:13:52 DTCFTS0371I Default list format is VM
09:13:57 DTCFTS0373I Default automatic translation is turned OFF
09:13:57 DTCFTS7003I Diagnose 88 authorization and Class B privilege
confirmed
Tom Cluster wrote:
Regarding FTPSERVE. It is in the directory, otherwise you wouldn't
see it logging on and then logging off. You need to look at the
messages it puts out when it runs. I believe by default its console
goes to TCPMAINT, but you could always just log it on directly (rather
th
I would agree with those who have responded so far and that is that DIRMAINT should be out there somewhere.
We're running 5.2 here and DIRMAINT is on it. The only difference I noticed is that we installed from tape. I think you
said you installed from DVD.
Steve G.
Regarding FTPSERVE. It is in the directory, otherwise you wouldn't
see it logging on and then logging off. You need to look at the
messages it puts out when it runs. I believe by default its console
goes to TCPMAINT, but you could always just log it on directly
(rather than xautologging it)
Title: RE: z/vm 5.2 - new install - DIRMAINT not in CP directory
5VMDIR10 is the product(installation/maintenance) userid for DIRMAINT.
My suggestion is to logon (not autolog) to 5VMDIR10 and look around a bit.
You should find sample directory entries for DIRMAINT and DATAMOVE there.
-Or
I still can't get DIRMAINT to run. Before I call IBM, I want to share
this info
I see that there is a USER DIRECT in MAINT's A disk and I issued
DIRECTXA, but still CP can not find DIRMAINT in the directory. The
product is enabled. I also noticed that DIRMAINT may be called 5VMDIR10.
So
That is frequently the case. If we have
problems, I have one compatriot who will search through Google in preference to
IBMLink or manuals. She usually gets what she needs.
Jon
I saw that Kurt Acker beat me
to it but I think it was interesting that I found it more easily
You may not have a complete NJE routing table in place at the
intervening or end nodes. Remember that for NJE to work, all nodes have
to know about all the possible destinations and the path to get there.
Does BSIVM43 have route statements via BSIVSE27 for your nodes, or a
default route for everyth
Title: Message
Also,
independent programs, such as DFSMS MODULE, call the ISPF segment. DFSMS
also invokes the SVM segment too.
-Original Message-From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colin
AllinsonSent: Friday, September 15, 2006 9:48
I saw that Kurt Acker beat me to it but I think it was interesting that
I found it more easily by googling NDMBK rather than on the IBM website
or a CD.
IBM: NDMBK
- 64-bit CP - V4R4.0NAME : HCPNDMBK DESCRIPTION :
Network Device Message Block DSECT : NDMBK FUNCTION ...
One NDMBK exists for to
That would be a Network Device Message
Block. Read all about it, and all your favorite CP data areas and
control blocks for r520 at: http://www.vm.ibm.com/pubs/cp520/index.html
Kurt Acker
Jon Brock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
09/15/2006 09:39 AM
Pleas
Jon Brock wrote:
Speaking a relative VM newbie, what in the Wide, Wide World of Sports
is a NDMBK?
Without any specific knowledge, from context and the naming convention,
it's a control block that you'd hear about if you got into CP internals.
"NDM" Block. It sounds like they were being alloc
On 9/15/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Of course since the saved
segment is used through a call to a module, and the module is probably
> started by an exec, change
the exec to send a message to operator when it starts.
Hi Peter,
Good idea and I thought of
that one. In a well regulated enviro
Speaking a relative VM newbie, what in the Wide, Wide World of Sports is
a NDMBK?
Thanks
Jon
Oh, yeah, I had that one during
share in march 2005. Lots of NDMBKs and things fell apart.
Of course since the saved segment is used
through a call to a module, and the module is probably started by an exec,
change the exec to send a message to operator when it starts.
-Original
Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] O
Martha,
Some more details on the VM hot-plug support.
VM should recognize the queues and leave them available for dedicated
use (APDED) if they were reserved for dedicated use in the directory,
but we don't change the queues we are using for queue-sharing without an
IPL. So even though VM would c
On 9/15/06, "Imler,
Steven J" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Colin,
> CA V/Seg-Plus' SDF
auditing facility can track this for you.
> However it does require
that the V/Seg CP mods have been installed.
> JR
Hi JR,
That is another good approach that I had not thought
about.
At the moment w
I would definitely not just import a directory from another
system. Look around for the direct file that must have gotten restored
when you restored the system. Going from z/VM 5.1 to 5.2 has got to
have given you some mdisks that are of a different size and location.
Jim
Ranga Nathan wro
Colin,
CA V/Seg-Plus' SDF auditing facility can track this for
you. However it does require that the V/Seg CP mods have been
installed.
JR
JR (Steven)
Imler
CA
Senior Software Engineer
Tel: +1 703 708
3479
Fax: +1 703 708
3267
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: The IBM z/VM Operating Syste
On 9/15/06, Rob
van der Heij <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I can do a Q NSS USERS ISPDCSS and occasionally see a user but
this relies
>> on me catching the use.
>>
>> Apart from doing sampling queries at regular intervals, is there
anyway that
>> I can monitor more accurately the use of the saved
On 9/15/06, Colin Allinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can do a Q NSS USERS ISPDCSS and occasionally see a user but this relies
on me catching the use.
Apart from doing sampling queries at regular intervals, is there anyway that
I can monitor more accurately the use of the saved segment?
Bac
We have a product that is little used
(ISPF) and would like to identify who is actually using it.
I can do a Q NSS USERS ISPDCSS and occasionally
see a user but this relies on me catching the use.
Apart from doing sampling queries at
regular intervals, is there anyway that I can monitor more acc
I will be out of the office starting 09/15/2006 and will not return until
09/19/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
If your request requires immediate attention, Please contact the MVS
Technical Support Hotline
at 1-866-866-4488 x12000
***
I have a file in SFS which is the subject of OPENVM PUT with options REP
and OLDD.
When I look at the directory using BFSLIST the time stamp is 4 hours ahea
d
of the timestamp of the file in SFS.
Q TIMEZONE gives EDT West 04.00.00 Active.
My question is "Is the BFS timestamp in UTC?"
31 matches
Mail list logo
