Unfortunately, VSE is my biggest issue, and we're pretty confident it cannot
do this. Thank you very much for your help.
Alan Altmark wrote:
You are correct. A guest, however, can synchronize *its* clock with an
external source. Linux can do this via NTP. I don't know about VSE.
Alan Al
That worked great!
Thanks Michael and Marcy.
Michael Coffin wrote:
Hi Rich,
When you disconnect the z/VM 5.3 OPERATOR you get the z/VM 5.3 HCPBOX,
and then you close the TN3270 emulator, right? That is your problem.
Don't forget that you are logged on to a virtual machine on the first
level C
I usually just use FORCE DISC from another ID. That way I know I've
done what I intended to do :)
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose,
Hi Rich,
When you disconnect the z/VM 5.3 OPERATOR you get the z/VM 5.3 HCPBOX,
and then you close the TN3270 emulator, right? That is your problem.
Don't forget that you are logged on to a virtual machine on the first
level CP (z/VM 5.2), and THAT virtual machine is running and OS which
happens
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 09:43 EDT, "McBride, Catherine"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We understand from your reply that synchronizing our HMC with the atomic
clock
> (or another server) is one thing, but "pushing" that time into the
operating
> system(s) does not occur without deactivatio
OK, I seem to be having a recall problem...
Here is the essence of a PROFILE EXEC that I'm using to bring up z/VM
5.3 under z/VM 5.2:
'CP SET RUN ON'
'CP TERMINAL HOLD OFF'
IPLCMD='TERM CONMODE 3270'||'15'X||'IPL C20'
'CP 'IPLCMD
It all works fine until I DISC the z/VM 5.3 OPERATOR an
Thank you!
We understand from your reply that synchronizing our HMC with the atomic
clock (or another server) is one thing, but "pushing" that time into the
operating system(s) does not occur without deactivation/activation of the
LPAR. There is no "real time" (pardon the pun) way to synchronize V
Well ... Here's another "take" on it!
-Original Message-
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 08:43 PM
Subject: PC World - IBM Data Centers Moving to Mainframes
http://www.pcworld.com/article/id,135331/article.html?tk=nl_dnxnws
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating Syst
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 03:12 EDT, "McBride, Catherine"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Now if we can get Mr. Altmark or Mr. Bitner to confirm (in other words,
> "Dudes, please reply to this!") you just solved an incredibly huge
problem
> for us.
> Judson West wrote:
>
>
> It'
On Tuesday, 07/31/2007 at 09:52 EDT, Marcy Cortes
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Interesting. I keep getting mixed messages from IBM.
>
> It sounds like you are talking about z/OS under z/VM?? I was talking
> about z/VM itself in its own LPAR and its Linux guests but z/OS running
> the show and j
I think the SE is updated from the HMC. FWIW, we keep the timezone on the
HMC to 0 and let the OS's make the proper adjustment. It makes the twice
yearly time changes a snap.
Judson West
Systems Programming Team
TeradataR, a division of NCR Corporation
___
I believe the LPAR get's it's time from the SE, the internal Laptop in
your box.
You can set the time from the HMC to the SE's if you want, but I believe
it is a manual process.
Larry Davis
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Beha
Marcy,
I didn't know that you had an MVS background :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:49 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $
The last I knew, z/VM won't pickup time changes from the HMC except at POR -
(Power On Reset), and *maybe?* when Activating the system from the HMC.
z/OS picks up time changes from the sysplex timer, and I vaguely recall more
recent announcements of external time source capabilities for z/OS, b
Mr. West,
THANK YOU!
Now if we can get Mr. Altmark or Mr. Bitner to confirm (in other words,
"Dudes, please reply to this!") you just solved an incredibly huge problem
for us.
Judson West wrote:
It's my understanding that at LPAR activation, the clock in the LPAR is
sync'ed with the H
It's my understanding that at LPAR activation, the clock in the LPAR is
sync'ed with the HMC. After that, it is on it's own.
Judson West
Systems Programming Team
TeradataR, a division of NCR Corporation
_
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto
Anyone know of a way to synchronize our TOD clock on our Z890 to the clock
on the HMC? Sound nuts, I realize, but the HMC's clock can be synchronized
to the rest of the server farm and the Z890 could maybe sync from the
HMC...?
Nah! It's Marty's Fifth Rule of Performance: "When in doubt, blame it on
network delays."
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 2:49 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject:
I wonder what system(s) host the gateway servers? :-)
Regardless, it's GREAT news to hear of such strong interest.
Now if our (using the royal "our") most senior management can just hear
about it, too! If that attempt is made, be sure to use simple words and
ideas. ;-)
Mike Walter
Hewitt A
Jim wrote:
>I suspect people downloading the videos are causing some of this problem.
When in doubt, blame the users! :)
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you
must no
> Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it's not working
> now. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21945.wss
We are experiencing timeouts on the gateway servers which
front-end much of the IBM web sirte. The response to this
announcement has been huge and the server includes v
Could it be resource starvation? SET SHARE TCPIP REL 5000 and see if
that helps.
> This is not normal. Pls check the console log of TCPIP or TCPMAINT.
> Terminating the connection could be related to a bunch of things, some
> debugging is required.
> Has anybody used or implemented anything on VM using the X Window
system interface?
Yes. It works as documented, but it is fairly old (X11R4 vintage), and
is really only easily usable from C applications. It also takes some
contortions to specify the right X server to connect to, and a few othe
Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it's not working now.
http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21945.wss
Paul Feller
AIT Mainframe Technical Support
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(319)-355-7824
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Not sure what you mean by "official", but it's very likely that
you'll see more on this from IBM and through other sources.
>Is there any chance IBM could possibly come out with an "official"
>announcement or publication indicating their $250M savings by
>consolidating to zSeries Linux? That migh
Hello Everyone,
It started with an article in DATABASE TRENDS AND APPLICATIONS
May 2007 Volume 21 number 5
Looks like Quebec is driving Oracle to Linux on z/VM.
http://blog.coleo.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/share_session_9230.pdf
It is large but a working document. F
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 12:35 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any chance IBM could possibly come out with an "official"
announcement
> or publication indicating their $250M savings by consolidating to
zSeries
> Linux? That might be a good marketing tool. Sometimes we need to
"co
Hi Alan,
Is there any chance IBM could possibly come out with an "official"
announcement or publication indicating their $250M savings by
consolidating to zSeries Linux? That might be a good marketing tool.
Sometimes we need to "convince" the uppers that this is a good way to go
(I'm still t
Hey I am going to try and implement FCP channel. Does anybody have a
cookbook with step-1, step-2, etc. and things to watch out for?
I have/am going through the Red-Books and am trying to make a step by
step map on a table top executrices before I hit a real system.
-Original Message-
F
Thanks, Dave.
Daniel Allen
Sr. System Programmer
Serena Software, Inc.
13713 Pinto Lane
Lodi, CA 95240
800-457-3736 ext. 11241
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Serena Software, Inc.
www.serena.com
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dave Jon
Oh, and code autorestart on the device if it is not there already.
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the
addressee, you must not use, copy, disclose, or take any action based on
this
Call your IBM HW support. You may have a flaky card (we had that prob
last year with one - same symptom).
And then, try to see if you can have more than 1 card on different real
switches so you have some redundancy and can stay up :)
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or p
DTCOSD309W Received adapter-initiated Stop Lan
Explanation: TCP/IP received a response from the device indicating that
the device is not ready. This can occur when the device is unplugged,
for example, or when a CP UNCOUPLE command is issued to disconnect a
virtual network adapter from a VM LA
Here is the TCPIP reader log:
04:20:01 DTCOSD309W Received adapter-initiated Stop Lan
* 08/01/07 *
04:20:01 DTCOSD082E OSD shutting down:
04:20:01 DTCPRI385IDevice [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
04
I did a Q PRINT and there is a file called TCPIP. I have done a quick
review of CMS Primer and CMS User Guide. We do not have a printer. How
do I look at the file ?
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Kreuter
Sent: Wednesda
It's very simple, Daniel, and you don't need a printer:-)
By default the TCPIP service virtual machine spools (routes) it's
console to the TCPMAINT user id. To see what's in the TCPIP console, do
this:
1) log onto TCPMAINT
2) see what's in it's reader queue: RDRL
3) there should be some l
I would think you want to look at the last reader file for TCPMAINT. It
might show why TCPIP was lost...
sign on as TCPMAINT
rl
Peek at TCPIP from last time it went down
Anne D. Crabtree
System Programmer
WV Dept of Administration - OT
304-558-1494
Fax 304-558-1441
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 8/1/2007
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 11:28 EDT, David Kreuter
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not normal. Pls check the console log of TCPIP or TCPMAINT.
Terminating
> the connection could be related to a bunch of things, some debugging is
> required.
If there are no obvious messages, then I recom
This is not normal. Pls check the console log of TCPIP or TCPMAINT. Terminating
the connection could be related to a bunch of things, some debugging is
required.
David
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Daniel Allen
Sent: Wed 8/1/2007 11:06 AM
To: IBMVM@
Recently our z/VM 5.2 system is losing connectivity to TCPIP. I force
TCPIP and xautolog TCPIP. Everything is fine again. This has happened
twice within two days. The z/OS system running under z/VM was okay. Has
anyone seen this behavior ?
**
thank you
Augie
Dave Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
are.com>
disregard last question about article
I did not see link at bottom
sorry
Dave Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
August, the actual article can be found here:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
August Carideo wrote:
Virtual machines is MF VM
VMware is like lparing
on the MF lparing did away for the need for VM at some shops instead of
running 3 virt machines under VM , run 3 lpars etc
wher
Virtual machines is MF VM
VMware is like lparing
on the MF lparing did away for the need for VM at some shops instead of
running 3 virt machines under VM , run 3 lpars etc
where was the actual article ? I would like to show it to some management
here
I never "implemented" X on CMS, but I have seen it done.
We're talking like more than 15 years ago, Steve. At the time, there
were less MT options than we have now. Kind of overkill to XAUTOLOG a
virtual machine just to run 'xclock'. But lately, we find that some USS
programs will run on
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 09:36 EDT, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
> This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed
> that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR
Macioce, Larry wrote:
But isn't lparing a VM technology??
Larry
Yes - LPAR and z/VM share a common ancestor, and there's still some of
my own code in LPAR from wy back, but these days they are very
different beasts.
Ray M
"LPARING?"
LPAR is now a verb (i.e. to LPAR or not to LPAR)?
"Macioce, Larry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
08/01/2007 08:37 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu
cc
Subject
Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating
I didn't see any mention in the article about LPARs (or z/VM, for that
matter) and no comment about "LPARs are IBM's premier virtualization
technology".
David Kreuter wrote:
... otherwise that would be a lot of LPARs! ...
Nice to see IBM farming with its own tools.
As I've been saying since 19
... otherwise that would be a lot of LPARs! ...
Nice to see IBM farming with its own tools.
As I've been saying since 1982: Ain't VM grand?
Brings a tear to my eye. Think I'll quit work for the day and contemplate the
great void.
David
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating Sys
On 8/1/07, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
> This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed
> that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR was touted as
> being IBM's "premier virtualisat
But isn't lparing a VM technology??
Larry
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Mansell
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:35 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on
to
Dave Jones wrote:
And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed
that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR was touted as
being IBM's "premier virtualisation product" - not that I have anything
And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
--
--
DJ
V/Soft
Has anybody used or implemented anything on VM using the X Window system
interface?
I came across it while looking for something else in the TCPIP Prog. Ref.
manual. Just curious.
Thanks,
Steve
Try appending ";type=a" to the URL.
-- R;
- Original Message -
From: Kris Buelens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 08/01/2007 07:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: ENCDIC->ASCII via FTP via Browser
My customer has disabled FTP on their workstations. Now I get a question to
simplify d
My customer has disabled FTP on their workstations. Now I get a question to
simplify download of reports to a workstations.
Using ftp://user:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is a good start, but all downloads are binary. Is there some trick to
trigger a EBCDIC to ASCII translation?
--
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belg
57 matches
Mail list logo
