List,
i have RSU tapes to update my VM 4.4 system.
following the service guide, i am doing the steps to prepare for service
refresh.
when i issue the VMFPSU ZVM CPSFS
i get this output:
vmfpsu zvm cpsfs
VMFPSU2760I VMFPSU processing started
VMFPSU1077I Comparing tables 4VMVMB40 VVT$PSU$ A and 4V
I believe you basically have three options for zVM console
sharing/automation:
1. PROP
2. CA's VM:Operator
3. IBM's Operations Manager.
Don't forget PerfKit also has console automation functions too.
Our basic needs were to:
1. allow multiple members of our operations team to monitor
> I just did the same with stunnel provided with SLES10. It seems to
work
> fine. Now what are the disadvantages compared to SSLSERV?
Not an exhaustive list:
Stunnel positives:
Uses OpenSSL, so the crypto engines work
Reference implementation of SSL, so more likely to be familiar to
non-mainfram
> As you suggested, I set the QDIO Home to 192.168.3.1 and the Linux
guest
> (CentOS) to 192.168.3.2.
> After the windows command route 192.168.3.0 mask 255.255.255.0
> 192.168.0.4, pinging 192.168.3.2 still does not work. The tracert
> 192.168.3.2 command doesn't even reach 192.168.0.4.
> And I am
Hello Miguel,
Indeed, this ptf will fix the NETSTAT GATE display. The default is now
shown as UGS. The NETSTAT GATE now shows the same output on both the old
and new VM. Well, besides the fact that the display itself does show the
records a bit differently.
But it didn't solve my orginal pr
On Aug 14, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 08/14/2007 at 11:26 EDT, "Mrohs, Ray"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I just did the same with stunnel provided with SLES10. It seems to
work
fine. Now what are the disadvantages compared to SSLSERV?
It's the same as the pre-z/VM 5.
thank you
"O'Brien, Dennis
L"
On Tuesday, 08/14/2007 at 11:26 EDT, "Mrohs, Ray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I just did the same with stunnel provided with SLES10. It seems to work
> fine. Now what are the disadvantages compared to SSLSERV?
It's the same as the pre-z/VM 5.3 support, requiring the client to
establish the SSL
August,
We use CRYPTO statements in the VM directory. Here's an example from a
z9. z890/z990's use the same syntax. z800/z900's are different.
CRYPTO DOMAIN 00 APDED 1
The Creating and Updating a User Directory chapter in CP Planning and
Administration has the syntax. That's Chapter 17 in th
Hi Lionel.
I believe you basically have three options for zVM console
sharing/automation:
1. PROP
2. CA's VM:Operator
3. IBM's Operations Manager.
Being a brand new zVM shop we decided to go with a vendor product
instead of PROP in an attempt to simplify the zVM
learning/implementation curve. A
Two questions , has anyone added CRYPTO statements to their VM directory,
even tho we do not have VM here any longer when we go to DR site we run
under VM
hence 2nd question, can anyone point me towards the correct manual that may
have this info
thanks,
Augie
I just did the same with stunnel provided with SLES10. It seems to work
fine. Now what are the disadvantages compared to SSLSERV?
Ray Mrohs
U.S. Department of Justice
202-307-6896
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff
David,
As you suggested, I set the QDIO Home to 192.168.3.1 and the Linux guest
(CentOS) to 192.168.3.2.
After the windows command route 192.168.3.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.4,
pinging 192.168.3.2 still does not work. The tracert 192.168.3.2 command
doesn't even reach 192.168.0.4.
And I am
If you're interested in additional functions that PROP doesn't provide, I
BM
Operations Manager for z/VM may fit the bill. For Tom's specific questio
n,
Operations Manager allows you to define a group of users and then apply a
rule to that group. The group definition supports wildcarding (*
14 matches
Mail list logo
