On Thursday, 10/18/2007 at 04:07 EDT, Alan Ackerman
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We don't have PCOMM, but QWS3270 Secure, so I don't know what our
> situation will be. [re: Resumed SSL sessions]
If you get a trace (e.g. Wireshark or something built into QWS3270) you
can see if sessions are res
Quoting Bill Holder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Responding all the way back to Mark Ristvedt's original post in this thread:
>
> Mark, do you have any data showing how busy your paging system was during or
> just prior to the hang / slowdown period? For that problem to be addressed
> by VM64269 and VM
Responding all the way back to Mark Ristvedt's original post in this thre
ad:
Mark, do you have any data showing how busy your paging system was during
or
just prior to the hang / slowdown period? For that problem to be address
ed
by VM64269 and VM64297, there would have to be substantial and
On Wed, 17 Oct 2007 10:43:51 -0400, Steve Bireley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The most expensive part of the connection is the public key exchange
during the SSL negotiation. This negotiation occurs every time the
control or data port is opened. In a multiple file transfer scenario,
each fi
Supported in what way for what need? Maybe check:
http://www.ibm.com/search/?en=utf&v=14&lang=en&cc=us&lv=w&q=hyperswap+vm+linux
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
"Stracka, James (GTI)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System"
10/18/2007 10:12 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM
Further update - Jim Sicignano from VM Level 2 sent me the following:
Hello Jerry,
VM64319 / UM32184 (R520 only) addresses such a problem.
ERROR DESCRIPTION:
Error when flashcopy target is a PPRC primary. VM63445 allows
Flashcopy target to be a PPRC Primary. Failing scenario:
FLASHCOPY 6D0
If so, is it also supported under z/Linux?
This message w/attachments (message) may be privileged, confidential or
proprietary, and if you are not an intended recipient, please notify the
sender, do not use or share it and delete it. Unles
Start with "HELP" and work your way through the list. There is a "TASKS"
sub-help menu that's good to start perusing.
Good luck.
GnanaShekar Subramani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
10/18/2007 07:19 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM
Friends of MVMUA,
The Metropolitan VM (and LINUX, MVS, VSE) Users Association
next meeting is Thursday October 25, 2007 at Information Builders in NYC
Please visit our web site for the AGENDA, DIRECTIONS and SECURITY
requirements for IBI.
I hope to see you next Thursday
thanx
--
Bill Munso
On 10/18/07, Anne D. Crabtree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> EREP OFF 2839 002 OPEREREP INACTIVE
> ACCOUNT ON 4589 020 OPERACCT INACTIVE
And when you fix OPERACCT, do the same for OPEREREP ;-)
Eventually this will fill up precious space in CP (though that might
be virtually preciou
Thanks so much! You are always a great help!
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2007 9:23 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: OPERACCT
It means that at one day, your V
It means that at one day, your VM system had two non-standard users:
OPEREREP and OPERACCT (I think the latter comes from a CA product).
Getting rid of those users in Q RECORDING isn't easy: requires a cold start
(I think).
But indeed, you should turn the collection for them off; otherwise CP will
Another starting point, if the guests are connected via vSwitch, would be to
"query vswitch" to get the name of the virtual switch. This will also tell
you how many guests are attached to the virtual switch. Then "query vswitch
active" to list the individual guests attached to the virtual
switch.
Hello, GnanaShekar.
Welcome to the wonderful world of z/VM and zLinux; I think you will find
it a very friendly and easy to use environment.
To see how many guests (virtual machines) are running running, try this
command:
CP Q Names
This will show you a list of all of the virtual machines
On my z/vm 5.3 system, I keep getting messages HCPCRC8083I about
accounting record threshold being exceeded for OPERACCT. I am using
DISKACNT to accumulate accounting records and it is the only userid
listed in System_Userids for ACCOUNT. When I query recording, I get
this:
q recording
Steve -
No, VMNFS does not restrict the number of connections. Turn on the 502
trace using the SMSG command ("SMSG VMNFS M MASK 502") or by updating
the :parms tag in the DTCPARMS file and try again. If the request is
getting there, that should show you why it is failing.
Mary Ellen Carollo
z
What is a good ratio of Central to Expanded storage to support an zLinux
Oracle workload under zVM 5.3?
The LPAR has 16GB assigned and our initial storage split is 12 Central,
4 Expanded. The workloads haven't been moved to this environment yet so
we have no tuning numbers available.
--
Mark
As an appetizer:
(command case is not important, I show minimum abbreviation in Uppercase)
CP Query Names lists all virtual machines that are active at this
time
CP IND USER x displays some detailsabout a virtual machine x
To find virtual machines that are defined and maybe
Hi,
I am a newbie to IBM systemz / Mainframe / zVM / zLinux. However I am
familiar to IBM system p, AIX and LPAR / virtualization in AIX.
I have been given a username / password for zVM; and my client wants me to
find out all the different partitions / guests that are existing.
A long time ago so
Hi Alyce: If you are new to VM I would also suggest using 2nd level VM for
testing, using the 1 cyl offset and G class user. This is a very safe
environment, easy to create and so easy to get R/O access to any data on
first level as Chris pointed out.
It's also very good to have an Emergency o
I will be out of the office starting 10/17/2007 and will not return until
10/22/2007.
I am in Gathersburg , MD and will have very limited access to e-mail.
With secondlevel systems it is also much easier to copy things from
firstlevel to secondlevel. For example (supposing you install CPHOST from
VM's download lib):
CP1 LINK someone 191 RR
ATT * R/O
ACCESS Z
And there you have (in R/O mode) all files of minidisk "someone 191" at
On 10/17/07, Austin, Alyce (CIV) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume I could also bring my "new" system up lst level
> rather than 2nd level since I have an additional LPAR available; or, do
> I have to bring it up 2nd level first (with the new volumes attached)
> and then bring it up lst level?
Thomas Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is why I like having my 2ndlvl maintenance system on real
>> volumes with real volsers. I can and will use it as a recovery
>> system.
This is a very valid point which my method does not address. The way I
define the systems volumes starting at c
24 matches
Mail list logo
