If all of the messages are from an asynchronous CP command, it might be
possible that the messages from it come after or between the ones from the
EXECDROP
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Beha
HI'm getting the following, but it looks like it worked:
iocp a1
DMSEXD418W Drop pending for IOCPREAL EXEC
IOCP:
TOTAL MESSAGES FOR SYNTAX CHECKING: 0INFORMATIONAL: 0
CAUTION: 00
000WARNING: 0ERROR: 0
TOTAL IOCP MESSAGES: 0INFORMATIONAL: 0CAU
Yepdidn't get that fardarn, looked promising.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE & RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas 76710
-Original M
Are you sure it worked as you expected? See usage note 1 of the help
for the RUN command:
"The RUN command passes only the file name (fn) of an exec to the EXEC
processor. Therefore, you cannot use "fm" to select a particular
exec."
You have to execload it, as Richard posted.
On Fri, Jul 17, 200
does it work?
The HELP for RUN command says
" The RUN command passes only the file name (fn) of an exec to the EXEC
processor. Therefore, you cannot use "fm" to select a particular exec."
Is the HELP mistaken?
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@lists
Look at Note 1 of the HELP.
1. If you are executing a CMS EXEC or EXEC 2 file, the arguments you enter
on the RUN command line are assigned to the variable symbols &1, &2,
and so on. If you are executing a REXX program, the arguments you enter
on the RUN command line are
Use file mode.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 2:36 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Invoking a pre-processor EXEC
I'd like to write a pre-processor EXEC of an exist
Found the RUN command...works like a charm.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE & RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.Fax: (254)741-5777
Waco, Texas 76710
-Original Message
'EXECLOAD EXECA EXEC Z EXECX EXEC (PUSH USER'
'EXEC EXECX'
'EXECDROP EXECX'
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers
> Sent: Friday, July 17, 2009 11:36 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSE
I'd like to write a pre-processor EXEC of an existing EXEC with the same
name. How do you make sure that the pre-processor EXEC doesn't invoke
itself and invokes the original EXEC. (It finds the pre-processor
first because of disk access order.)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer
You do always have to check. Just because something has not changed in a long
time does not mean that it will never change.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael Donovan
Sent: Friday
On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Michael Donovan wrote:
> Fair enough! It seemed to me as though the discussion had turned to more of
> a concern over the amount of time needed to rework exits each time service
> or a new release came out. Since there have not been changes made since
> VM/ESA 2.2.
Fair enough! It seemed to me as though the discussion had turned to more
of a concern over the amount of time needed to rework exits each time
service or a new release came out. Since there have not been changes made
since VM/ESA 2.2.0, I was curious as to why the perception existed that
there
13 matches
Mail list logo
