Hi,
we are facing problem with our cmsvmlib when IPLed as II level vm 5.4
DMSDCS1083E Saved segment CMSVMLIB does not exist
i cms
07:31:35 HCPCLT044E System CMS does not exist
How to fix this problem?
On Tuesday, 09/01/2009 at 07:45 EDT, "O'Brien, Dennis L"
wrote:
> We're starting to test hipersockets between Linux guests on z/VM and
z/OS
> systems in separate LPAR's. z/OS is having intermittent trouble pinging
one of
> the four Linux guests, but is fine with the other three. All four Li
We're starting to test hipersockets between Linux guests on z/VM and z/OS
systems in separate LPAR's. z/OS is having intermittent trouble pinging one of
the four Linux guests, but is fine with the other three. All four Linux guests
have no trouble pinging z/OS. Someone suggested that the devi
On Tuesday, 09/01/2009 at 04:05 EDT, Pete Borton
wrote:
> All I can say is 'It works for me' - as long as the CMS file was text in
the
> first place of course (sorry forgot that bit in my first response! Why
would
> you pack a binary file anyway ?). I've just tested it and it works
fine. It
>
Far easier is to use the (free)VMFTP package described earlier.
Mike Walter
Hewitt Associates
(Sent from the wee keyboard on a Blackberry.)
- Original Message -
From: "Wakser, David" [david.wak...@infocrossing.com]
Sent: 09/01/2009 02:44 PM MST
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: S
You'll have to show the whole EXEC, if you really want us to figure it out.
Following is one that works fine in z/VM 5.3 (it transfers VM to VM, so ignore
the SENDSITE command and use what you need). Is it possible that the size of
the VM is too small?
David Wakser
arg fn ft fm . /* file to
Can you script FTP? Help doesn't mention it. If I attempt to QUEUE
the commands from a REXX program, I get:
VM TCP/IP FTP Level 540
AMPX014I PROTECTION EXCEPTION
This is the command format:
IND$FILE PUT fn ft fm ( ASCII CRLF RECFM F LRECL 1024
Pete
-Original Message-
From: Peter Borton
Sent: 01 September 2009 21:04
To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating System'
Subject: RE: Retrieving a VM Packed file
All I can say is 'It works for me' - as long as the
Hello P S (zosw...@gmail.com),
As scared as I get talking in front of groups, I am hoping to present at WAVV
next year.
I am finding that it may come down to how support and questions are handled. I
am starting to see the
Same basic functions with just different philosophic viewpoints of how
If you have the ability to capture CPU seconds consumed (a good
performance monitor does this), then it is an easy calculation assuming
you know the power of your IFL: (CPU Seconds / time) * MIPSRating
Paul, Thomas wrote:
Hi
We are in the process of migrating Websphere applications from z/OS
All I can say is 'It works for me' - as long as the CMS file was text in the
first place of course (sorry forgot that bit in my first response! Why would
you pack a binary file anyway ?). I've just tested it and it works fine. It
definitiely WON'T work for binary files. VM packed files are Fixed 1
You do want to spread your paging over as many LCU's as possible for
performance reasons, but those can all be on the same DS8000. The one box
really can act like more than one controller.
And rare, well, if it was, then why would you pprc mirror anyway? (locally that
is :). We're not allowe
Nope!
Tony Pignataro
IBM Information Technology Services America
DB2/VM Support
From: Howard Rifkind
To:
Hello Graves, you should only concern with 2 buffer settings: NPAGBUF and
NDIRBUF. Especially the NPAGBUF - the more the merrier.
DB2 only works on data in its buffers. It will move data from DASD when it does
not find what it is looking for in the buffers. So, the more buffer allocated,
the b
Thanks all for trying to help - now, it is working as desired using the same
commands and files as yesterday. There were some automatic updates from the PC
wizards (very much like the one from Oz, if you ask me), and now the quotes
survive the FTP. Many other things are now working better, too,
Thanks! We do use VM Dataspaces, but the TARGETWS parameter does need
to be updated.
Nora Graves
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 1:00 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Hi
Anybody can help me with some rationale into these info...what may be the
threshold to trigger an alert?
ZLA1N101 : 12% overhead
• File name : D:\zLinux\GClogs\gc.zla1n101.log
• Number of verboseGC cycles : 1
• Number of Garbage Collections : 1404
• Number of
Hi
I'm trying to explain these from z/OS in terms of z/VM world... can anybo
dy
help?
For z/Linux, as seen in the report, the MIPS consumed were:
ZLA1N101: 190
ZLA1N102: 212
ZLA1N120: 5
ZLA1N118:
On Tuesday, 09/01/2009 at 12:54 EDT, Pete Borton
wrote:
> I have successfully retrieved IND$FILE files transferred to a PC as text
by
> using LRECL 1024 on the IND$FILE RECEIVE options.
There are three problems inherent in transferring binary data as text:
1. Non-reversible translations.
2. Dat
No, look at the AUTOONLY password. See
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/BOOKS/HCSG0B20/3.2.57?SHELF=hcsh2a91&DT=20070423114140
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Howard
NOLOG is the special password that indicates this userid can NEVER be log
ged on.
AUTOONLY is the one to use for server virtual machines to be xautologged
and
never allowed on a terminal.
LBYONLY is the one to use for shared virtual machines where you want the
user to be validated by their own u
Hi
We are in the process of migrating Websphere applications from z/OS to
z/Linux under VM. I have questions, if you can answer these questions,
it'll be greatly apprciated.
1. Under z/OS environment MIPS capping was implemented. Is there
equivalent in z/VM - I know of Share (abs & rel),
Howard,
A password of NOLOG does not allow AUTOLOG or XAUTOLOG. Set the
password to AUTOONLY if you want to allow AUTOLOG/XAUTOLOG but not
LOGON.
Dennis O'Brien
I couldn't remember how to throw a boomerang, but eventually it came
back to me
If the nolog option is included in a user directory entry can autolog1 log that
user id on?
Can that user id be xautologged?
Thanks
Peter Borton would like to recall the message, "Retrieving a VM Packed
file".
If your DB2 uses VM Dataspaces, it will profit of tyhe extra storage your
z/VM system has, but, you may have to check DB2's TARGETWS parameter, this
can limit the storage DB2 can occupy, simplified: if DB2 finds out it has
more pages resident than that number, it will tell CP to get rid of some of
I have successfully retrieved IND$FILE files transferred to a PC as text by
using LRECL 1024 on the IND$FILE RECEIVE options.
Not sure about FTP though.
Regards,
Peter Borton
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Suleiman Sh
I was hoping to hear that from someone else so I can appeal!
But now it's final!
Thanks.
Suleiman Shahin
>
> Unlikely. If was transferred with translation table STANDARD (likely),
> the file is toast. The translations in STANDARD are not reversible.
>
> Alan Altmark
> z/VM Development
> IB
On Tuesday, 09/01/2009 at 12:29 EDT, Suleiman Shahin
wrote:
> Someone ftped a packed CMS file to a network disk as text.
>
> Is there a way to retrieve back to CMS in an a usable form?
Unlikely. If was transferred with translation table STANDARD (likely),
the file is toast. The translations
Greetings,
Someone ftped a packed CMS file to a network disk as text.
Is there a way to retrieve back to CMS in an a usable form?
Thanks.
Suleiman Shahin
_
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
Cross-posted to VM/ESA and DB2 lists.
I'm running DB2 7.5 under z/VM 5.4 (both are the current releases). We
have a brand-new z10 processor. My Systems Programmer has offered me 1
Gig of RAM, up from our current Virtual Storage of 384 Meg for the
production database.
I'd like to take advant
The problem with putting all your paging volumes on one DS-8000 then
becomes performance. Your paging devices will now be sharing physical
disks. When you write pages out to multiple "page devices", then all of
the I/O is then going to the same set of hardware.
From a performance perspective,
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 8:21 AM, Florian wrote:
> This is what I expected. I fear also that the chance is doubled to crash the
> system when the PAGING volumes are spread on both DS-8000. So I will correct
> this soon.
I used to joke that it would be best to put all our critical resources
on a sin
33 matches
Mail list logo