You can start with "LISTFILE (AFTER date" and then fine tune with a PIPE
PICK.
'PIPE COMMAND LISTFILE ... (AFTER' somedate '(ISO NOH',
'|PICK 68.8 >>= /'sometime'/', /* Sometime format: hh:mm:ss */
'|SPEC /&1 &2/ 1 W1.3 NW',
'|LITERAL &TRACE',
'|> CMS EXEC A'
But, why store the
YES - into a CMS EXEC file
but... I am sorry I forgot to mention that hh:mm:ss is also part of the
input so I cannot use the AFTER parameter I guess
Thanks !
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of
I must say I don't understand your question. Are you looking for something
like
'PIPE COMMAND LISTFILE * * A(AFTER 2010-04-22 |
2010/7/22 Gonen Shoham
> Hello
>
> Can someone send piece of PIPE code to run and create CMS EXEC file with
> minidisk files created after a given date ?
>
> Ma
Hello
Can someone send piece of PIPE code to run and create CMS EXEC file with
minidisk files created after a given date ?
Many thanks
DISCLAIMER:
This e-mail and any attachments may be confidential or legally privileged, and
is only transmitted for the intended recipient. If you received this
I am out of the office until 07/26/2010.
I am out of the office. Call my cell if this is an emergency.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: TCP/IP Server"
sent on 7/21/10 16:34:36.
This is the only notification you will receive while this person is away.
Thanks Alan and Alex for your comments. I will check it out on Monday when
I'm back in the office.
Hans
---Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: July-21-10 11:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Receive
Without it being a formal policy, we have been doing that for years.
Is there any significance to the POSIXINFO statement in a NOLOG user's
directory?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of
On Wednesday, 07/21/2010 at 06:06 EDT, "Schuh, Richard"
wrote:
> Keeping those ids in place does nothing to protect the file space if
your
> statement, "A user with the same name as an SFS filespace (whether it is
BFS or
> not) has ownership rights of the filespace," is true. There is nothing
To everyone: I'm sorry. I should not have put a historical reference in
my post. Pretty soon folks will be talking about how they remember
rubbing the edges off of rocks to get them to roll more easily.
My abject apologies. I humbly beg forgiveness.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicot
Keeping those ids in place does nothing to protect the file space if your
statement, "A user with the same name as an SFS filespace (whether it is BFS or
not) has ownership rights of the filespace," is true. There is nothing that
says that the name of the filespace is the same as the userid of t
Do you remember the 024?
"Sigh... these youngsters!"
Mike Walter, 2010
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Jefferson Davis
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 2:42 PM
>
On Wednesday, 07/21/2010 at 04:47 EDT, Michael Donovan/Endicott/i...@ibmus
wrote:
> If you are using the OpenExtensions Shell & Utilities (S&U) code on CMS,
then
> you want to leave those ids in the CP directory. If you are not using
the S&U
> code, then feel free to remove these ids. They a
For heaven's sake, I meant the 026. I am losing it in my old age.
Jeff
-Original Message-
From: Jefferson Davis [mailto:jeffersondavi...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:39 PM
To: 'The IBM z/VM Operating System'
Subject: RE: DISKACNT records
I sure wished we had a keypun
Thanks to all who have replied. I cannot think of that particular VM image ever
using OE. It is a single purpose system and uses very little of the
capabilities of CMS.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.e
If you are using the OpenExtensions Shell & Utilities (S&U) code on CMS,
then you want to leave those ids in the CP directory. If you are not using
the S&U code, then feel free to remove these ids. They are place holders
for certain functions used by the S&U.
Thanks!
Mike
-
>From the OpenExtension's User Guide:
In addition, the following POSIX users are added, if they are not
already defined:
___ ___ ___
| Userid| UID | Primary |
| | | group |
|___|___|___
| root |
This is how 'posix' was implemented on zVM -- several NOLOG users -
including DAEMON, ROOT, NOBODY, etc.. if you are not using posix - feel
free to get rid of it. It's just a placeholder user - as all the posix
implementation users were/are.
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Schuh
In looking over the directory of a recently inherited system, I find this entry:
USER DAEMON NOLOG 32M 32M G
POSIXINFO UID 1 GID 1
Really, that is the entire entry. The next USER statement follows the POSIXINFO
line..
Is this entry of any use whatsoever? I can think of only two
The 1403 was a printer.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Jefferson Davis
> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:39 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: DISKACNT records
>
> I su
I've seen a post that says the output of the C compiler on Z/OS is compatible
with what VM needs. If the systems are connected, as I would hope, then no extra
fees are involved.
Les
Dunsmuir, Allan wrote:
Folks,
I'm beginning the task of updating the InfoZIP zip and
unzip ports for z/OS MVS
I thought a 1403 was a printer
may have had to punch a carriage control tape for it but not cards
Jefferson Davis
I sure wished we had a keypunch department we had to punch our own!
Good old 1403.
:-)
Jefferson Davis
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 12:08 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.
Effectively there were optical card "punches", also known as #2 pencils.
--
Mike Harding
z/VM System Support
mhard...@us.ibm.com
mike.b.hard...@kp.org
mikehard...@mindless.com
(925) 926-3179 (w)
(925) 323-2070 (c)
IM: VMBearDad (AIM), mbhcpcvt (Y!)
The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 07/21/
Sigh... these youngsters!
History lesson: ON
Completed coding sheets are output from programmers (perhaps their only
valuable output).
After exhaustive "desk checking" (olde English for "a complete and utter
waste of time", since programmer's are always perfect), the coding sheets
were then in
Coding sheets?
What privclass are they protected with?
On 07/21/2010 12:11 PM, Alan Altmark wrote:
Now you've got me thinking about a SYSTEM CONFIG option to disable STORE
HOST (a la SET JOURNAL) and making it the default.You would have no
choice, but to re-IPL to get the command back (unle
That works great! Thanks!
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Michael Harding
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:23 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DISKACNT records
On Wednesday, 07/21/2010 at 12:23 EDT, Michael Harding/Oakland/i...@ibmus
wrote:
> cp st hlse8d8 40
> RPIMGR055E COMMAND STORE.C NOT DEFINED TO RACF
> Store complete.
*slap*
Not only is this not for the faint of heart, it is a path to the Dark
Side. In a well-secured environment, the STOR
Forget the IBM compiler. License the Dignus C/C++ compiler for your pc
and just upload the resulting objects. Several vendors that I know of
use this approach. Much cheaper.
http://www.dignus.com/products.shtml
Tony Thigpen
-Original Message -
From: Dunsmuir, Allan
Sent: 07/21/2010 12
Folks,
I'm beginning the task of updating the InfoZIP zip and
unzip ports for z/OS MVS and z/OS USS. This is being done
as part of my "real job" at RBC, and I'm working with
the InfoZIP crew to keep the process of integrating and
supporting these updates going smoothly.
There has been some d
Yikes, dark magic
On 07/21/2010 11:22 AM, Michael Harding wrote:
Well...
Not recommended as a general practice, or for the faint of heart, and
installation rules may prevent, but:
d hl998
HL0998 E000 36 R0998
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 09:13:05
d hle8c8.20
HLE8C8 D6D7C5D9 C1E3D6D
Well...
Not recommended as a general practice, or for the faint of heart, and
installation rules may prevent, but:
d hl998
HL0998 E00036 R0998
Ready; T=0.01/0.01 09:13:05
d hle8c8.20
HLE8C8 D6D7C5D9 C1E3D6D9 D6D7C5D9 C1E3D6D9 06 RE8C8
HLE8D8 0
You are correct.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:54 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DISKACNT records
It appears to requi
It appears to require an IPL to pickup the SYSTEM CONFIG changes for
JOURNALING. Anyone know any different?
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Aria Bamdad
Sent: Wednesday, July 21,
It appears that there is a setting in the SYSTEM CONFIG that is not
specified and therefore defaulted to "OFF". (See the Journaling
statement in the "CP Planning and Administration" manual.)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating Syst
Nobody is exceeding the counts or, perhaps, Journaling is not turned on?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 8:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UAR
You must login to an account with Class A or E privilege. Logon to MAINT
and issue from there.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:29 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: DISKACNT records
q journal
HCPJRL003E Invalid option - JOURNAL
Ready(3); T=0.01/0.01 10:32:37
Ahhh
Usage Notes
1. The QUERY JOURNAL command can be used only if the SET_AND_QUERY
ON
operand is specified on the JOURNALING statement in the system
c
Well, I've looked at the Month-to-date data and the previous two months,
with no hits.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 10:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.
cp q journal
HCPJRL003E Invalid option - JOURNAL
Ready(3); T=0.01/0.01 10:29:11
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Aria Bamdad
Sent: Wednesday, July 21,
Hello Everyone,
How much overhead does this add to the overall system?
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-363-5050
ext 35050
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Aria Bamdad
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:22 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK
Are any password violations occurring? (that sounds a lot worse than it
is... :) )
On 07/21/2010 10:14 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote:
I’m only finding ‘01’, ‘02’ (mostly) and ‘0B’ records generated. I was
hoping for some ‘04’ records.
Does anyone know why I wouldn’t get any of these? (passwo
Is it possible you have turned off Journaling Facility? Issue CP Q JOURNAL
and check your SYSTEM CONFIG file.
Aria
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 11:14 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:
On Tuesday, 07/20/2010 at 10:46 EDT, Hans Rempel
wrote:
> This is my first time to receive a certificate using CMS SSL support. I
think I
> followed all the steps correctly but I?m receiving the above message
when using
> option 5. Receive requested certificate. I created a certificate
reque
I'm only finding '01', '02' (mostly) and '0B' records generated. I was
hoping for some '04' records.
Does anyone know why I wouldn't get any of these? (password violations)
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer
MCP, MCP+I, MCSE & RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co.
Phone: (2
Here it depends as to what type of dasd the home directory lies on. IF
it is on CKD dasd, we utilize our z/OS system running Dasd Backup
Supervisor which creates FDR jobs to back up the entire volume. IF the
home directory lies on ( or even if we wish to back up just the home
directory off of C
Hello all,
Anyone on the list backup their users' linux image home directory? What
process do you use?
Thank you,
Mary Zervos
VM Systems Programmer
Binghamton University
On Tuesday, 07/20/2010 at 04:10 EDT, Marcy Cortes
wrote:
> Not that long unless its 57 Terabytes.
> I think it's the safe thing to do too, but z/OS is doing them this time
(don't
> ask) and they are questioning the necessity.
> Would be good to have a definitive answer from IBM! (IBM disk).
47 matches
Mail list logo
