Re: Supporting Dot.1q trunk in z/Linux

2011-03-26 Thread Marcy Cortes
Marcy :) Your using a trunk port requires the vswitch to "vlan tag" the stuff sent over it. So say you have default vlan of 100 on the vswitch going out over it and your vswitch has that defined as the default. Then if the IP x.x.x.x is on vlan 100 then you don't need a vlan on the grant. If th

Re: Supporting Dot.1q trunk in z/Linux

2011-03-26 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Mary, What would be the LAN name on the GRANT? And is the GRANT the place I would need to specify LAN parameter? Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin CMS - CITIC 3300 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite 200, 21244  Engineering Computing Mainframe Support Cell - 443 632-4191 -Original Messag

Re: Supporting Dot.1q trunk in z/Linux

2011-03-26 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Thanks Mary! Thank You, Terry Martin Lockheed Martin CMS - CITIC 3300 Lord Baltimore Drive, Suite 200, 21244  Engineering Computing Mainframe Support Cell - 443 632-4191 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Marcy Cortes

Re: Supporting Dot.1q trunk in z/Linux

2011-03-26 Thread Marcy Cortes
Right, your vswitch and nicdef statements don't change.You may have to put a vlan on your SET VSWITCH GRANT statements. Marcy -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) Sent: Thursday, March 2

Re: RSCS Problem - return code=- 1 error number=54 (Connection reset by peer)

2011-03-26 Thread Undetermined origin c/o LISTSERV administrator
David, Thanks for the suggestions but I think there is a fundamental problem with our TCP/IP set up. I tried sending files via FTP and get exactly the same problem, small ones get through but larger transfers hang. Time to get my networking hat on :-) Regards, Paul Garment Global z/OS Virt

DB2 Connect and DB2 V7.5

2011-03-26 Thread E. Roller
Thanks to all who responded! The DB2 Connect V8.1 is the Enterprise Version, it works well with the VM DB2 V7.3 Database (without Stored Procedure Server). Meanwhile I did an unload of the modules from P1 (V7.3) and loaded them into T1 (V7.5): now all works well. But this is not my preferred meth

Re: Support Element (SE) vs HMC and IP Addresses

2011-03-26 Thread Feller, Paul
The HMC "can do things" because it talks to the SE. As an example, the SE is where the IOCDS is stored, it's really what you talk to when you make lpar profile changes. There are some things you can't do from the HMC, that's why there is the "single object operation" option on the HMC to conn

Re: Support Element (SE) vs HMC and IP Addresses

2011-03-26 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
Also, would someone kindly explain the functional differences between the Support Element (SE) and the Hardware Management Console (HMC) other than the HMC can: do everything an SE can do do it for more than one CEC do it as a portal for the intra/internet Alan Altmark Sent by: The IBM z/

Re: Support Element (SE) vs HMC and IP Addresses

2011-03-26 Thread George Henke/NYLIC
Alan Altmark wrote: Our networking people say the SE's are reachable from our corporate intranet so that we can provide redundance for two mainframes, 1000 miles apart. But I suspect they are reachable only through the HMC. If the SE's are connected directly to the corporate intranet,, what

Re: DB2 Connect and DB2 V7.5

2011-03-26 Thread Roland P. Chung
Hello Ewald, I think the missing OBJECTs with CREATOR of NULLID are from running a BIND from UDB DB2/Connect against a DB2/VM server using DB2??LST. Please check your UDB DB2/Connect PD. However, you also have to run the following 'GRANT's before running the UDB DB2/Connect BIND: CONNECT SQLDB