We don't want it part of SES, at least not the SES that exists today.
We may be faced with a requirement that "other group" installs our changes or
at least signs off on them.
Joe Operator needs to be able to confirm that PTF UMx is installed. I
don't want him on MAINT.
I want him to issue
My opinion of this is:
1) it should support all of the components of z/VM and not just CP.
2) it should be part of the SERVICE command, or at least part of VM/SES.
I do like the approach LE takes, being able to see what service is for
any given module.
DJ
On 4/11/2011 10:54 AM, Schuh, Richar
On Monday, 04/11/2011 at 05:04 EDT, Leland Lucius
wrote:
> I should know this, but my aging mushy stuff just isn't working for me
today.
>
> If we define multiple z/VM LPARs with dedicated IFLs, can those IFLs
> be moved from one LPAR to another? Is it as simple as "vary off..."
> and "vary on
Leland,
Please define "dedicated".
IIUC, "dedicated" really pertains to the LPAR definition. If an
engine/CPU of any type) is "dedicated" at the LPAR definition and the HMC,
that LPAR is only place it can be used.
If the engine/CPU is not dedicated, then it can be varied off one LPAR,
and va
I should know this, but my aging mushy stuff just isn't working for me today.
If we define multiple z/VM LPARs with dedicated IFLs, can those IFLs
be moved from one LPAR to another? Is it as simple as "vary off..."
and "vary on..."?
Thanks,
Leland
I will take this opportunity to first agree with Dennis, (Thank you
Dennis) and say that for VSE installations running under z/VM, we have a
phenomenal offering called the ZVPS Starter Kit that won't break any
even little banks.
O'Brien, Dennis L wrote:
Velocity Software has an ESAFORCE compon
You should name it to USER INPUT - not INPUT USER.. You also need to
ERASE or RENAME USER DIRECT on the DIRMAINT 1DF as well..
I'm really not sure if the above is the reason you are getting the message
-- maybe you entered the password wrong - not sure.. but make sure you are
rebuilding the dir
Hi
I think I may have screwed up here. I had to make multiple changes to my
Directory so I did the following:
I did a DIRM USER WITHPASS to get the current directory
I then added my changes to USER WITHPASS on my A disk
I then shutdown DIRMAINT.
I then copied the USER WITHPASS from my A disk
Velocity Software has an ESAFORCE component which can force idle users.
I imagine it could just list them, too.
Dennis
"If you give a mouse a cookie, he's going to ask for a glass of milk."
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto
John,
Exactly. But only if all IFL virt. processors of userid GUEST are busy (with
hard load), of course.
2011/4/11 John Hanley
> Maxim,
> Thanks for the reply.
> So if the system has 6 real IFL processors and 2 real CP processors
> with the virtual guest as VCONFIG=LINUX , CPUAFFINITY = ON and
On 4/11/11 11:54 AM, "Schuh, Richard" wrote:
>That would be nice. It ought to also have a way to answer Marcy's
>question, "Has PTF xxx been applied to the system (or, perhaps, to a
>specified module)?" without having to wade through a list of the universe
>of PTFs.
PIPE COMMAND SERVICE LIST CP
David wrote:
> Not like the VM/SP days...8-)
Some of us exploiting new things are having VM/SP moments :)
I just want a CP Query that tells me about the running system. It's a *bad
thing* when one thinks they have applied a PTF after scheduling an IPL and
finding it not on later. Bad things h
Maxim,
Thanks for the reply.
So if the system has 6 real IFL processors and 2 real CP processors
with the virtual guest as VCONFIG=LINUX , CPUAFFINITY = ON and 3 virtual IFL processors .
Then use 'SET SHARE guest abs 30% abs 30% limith', each virtual IFL will get a 10% share?
Maxim Boc
On 4/11/11 9:29 AM, "Bob Bates" wrote:
>If one gets the PSP buckets and put them on at the same time as the RSU,
>as one should, wouldn't it always show the ++?
Yes, but that's as it should. RSU is the basic level set of "service
level", and if you add the PSP bucket on top of it, then you are n
That would be nice. It ought to also have a way to answer Marcy's question,
"Has PTF xxx been applied to the system (or, perhaps, to a specified module)?"
without having to wade through a list of the universe of PTFs. As long as we
are dreaming, it would be nice to have a defined interface so th
John,
The 1st case. All processors of a type in summary have specified share
value. So, You may have 1 PU, with specified share (let's, it will CP, the
share is 100), you may define another CPU (via CP DEF CPU 1 TYPE CP
command), each CPU will have 50 points of relative share then, and the sum
rem
Redirect...
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
From: owner-vs...@lehigh.edu [mailto:owner-vs...@lehigh.edu] On Behalf
Of Wakser, David
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 10:41 AM
To: VSE Discussion List
Subject: VM question - QIDLE
Since our email addresses were ch
When setting an absolute share value for a virtual machine with multi virtual CPU'S and CPUAFFINITY=ON,
is the absolute value divided between the CPU'S or does each CPU get the set value?
The doc seem a little vague on this for CPUAFFINITY=ON or OFF.
Thanks.
Language Environment (LE) has its LEMODLVL routine which displays the APARs
applied to each part used to build an input MODULE name, e.g. LEMODLVL
CEEPLPKA will display a list of all the parts used to build CEEPLPKA MODULE
and the latest APAR applied to each part.Specifying the SEGMENT option
A question on this though:
If one gets the PSP buckets and put them on at the same time as the RSU, as one
should, wouldn't it always show the ++?
I do like the idea of something that lists all the fixes easily, preferably by
CP so logging on to MAINT isn't necessary (ok, I guess I could link
TCPSLVL let's you see service level of TCPIP components on a module-by-module
basis.
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group
> Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2011 20:31:37 -0500
> From: marcy.d.cor...@wellsfargo.com
> Subject: Re: Sevice level
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>
>
> TCPIP would be nice too, but no
What the carbon units do does not always make sense. 8-)
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2011 1:00 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Will it run ?
On Thursday, 04/07/2011 a
I am out of the office until 04/18/2011.
I will respond to your message when I return. Please contact my manager
Hanif Dandia if you need assistance before my return. Or other Level2 folks
in my department.
Note: This is an automated response to your message "Re: Will it run ?"
sent on 4/11/2
23 matches
Mail list logo
