Re: Inconsistent XEDIT Logical Not

Jefferson Davis wrote: It was from the Pogo strip and I think Albert the alligator said it. Jeff Davis -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Bohnsack Sent: Saturday, July 08, 2006 9:24 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subjec

Re: OT: And now, a note from our moderator regarding Acronym Silliness

Daniel P. Martin wrote: Not at all. It's easy. I log in between 07:00-07:30, and back out around 22:00-23:00. This home office thingie is GREAT! Deadlines are for wimps. :-P -dan. Jim Bohnsack wrote: Dan--Do you have too much time on your hands? Jim At 04:32 PM 6/27/2006, you wrote:

Re: Finding DUPS in a CMS file

Thomas Kern wrote: Untested but try this. "PIPE AHELP SORT" for more information. /* */ arg infn inft infm outfn outft outfm "pipe <" infn inft infm "| sort unique 1.20 | >" outfn outft outfm exit /Tom Kern --- "Wakser, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: All: Is there a "simple"

Re: Volume with minidisks has no allocation information

Tom Cluster wrote: Hello, VM experts, I'm preparing myself for teaching the mysteries of VSE and VM systems work and I'm reminded that when one prepares to teach something one discovers many holes and uncertainties in one's own knowledge. Today I thought I'd educate myself about IPL bootstr

Re: the IND LOAD command

Steve Gentry wrote: On VM 4.3 when the IND LOAD was issued it returned, among pieces of info, the percentage (IIRC) of how much main memory was being used, i.e, Storage Utilization. The IND LOAD command in 5.2 does not provide this information anymore. Is this info provided by some other co

Re: VTAM and SFS Installation

Alan Ackerman wrote: VTAM ran in VS1 and VSE long before GCS -- so I would guess that the port was from VS1 to GCS, not from MVS to GCS. Not a big port -- or one requiring much knowledge of CMS. Like many other people, we never moved our users to SFS because of lack o f OfficeVision support

Re: VTAM and SFS Installation

Rich Greenberg wrote: On: Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 03:01:27PM -0700,Schuh, Richard Wrote: } The current VM/VTAM was GA in 1992. We were already using SFS for many applications and most of VM. Granted. Weren't the VTAM developers mainly MVS folks who were porting VTAM to MVSjr (aka GCS) and didn't

Re: I'll never understand

Rob van der Heij wrote: On 6/2/06, Stephen Frazier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Take a dump sent it to IBM and they will fix the problem that caused it this time. They have fixed many problems with the symptom LOGOFF/FORCE pending. If they keep getting dumps they may get then all fixed someday

Re: VMFTP

Lee Stewart wrote: Can someone point me to the current home for VMFTP (the FTP subcommand processor by Romney)? Thanks, Lee Lee, a search of the list archives came up with http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0510&L=IBMVM&P=R3721&I=-3 posted b

Re: z/VM 5.2 and the S disk

Alan Altmark wrote: On Friday, 05/26/2006 at 02:37 EST, Steve Gentry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Besides, Chuckie hasn't said anything about it, so I figure I can't get myself into too much trouble. Don't push your luck, pal. "can't get myself into too much trouble" HA! D

Re: z/VM 5.1 CPU Utilization

Tim Joyce wrote: We are looking at upgrading from z/VM 4.3 to supported z/VM 5.1. Because z/VM 5.1 will not run on our 9672-x27, we will have to upgrade boxes first. We need to choose a new box based on what capacity we will be needing. We are aware of several changes to z/VM between versions

Re: Emulated tape/ECKD disk

David Boyes wrote: How is "Emulated Tape" different from the VTAPE product from VSSI (Virtual Software Systems, Inc.)? Unless I totally misunderstand what VTAPE does, it solves a different problem. What I'm asking for is the ability to use existing SCSI tape drives w/o having to

Re: Emulated tape/ECKD disk

Alan Ackerman wrote: How is "Emulated Tape" different from the VTAPE product from VSSI (Virtua l Software Systems, Inc.)? That already exists -- see . Is what you are asking for better than VTAPE -- or are you just asking IB M to provide free what you c

Re: ZVM 5.2 and Z890 and CTCA

Hughes, Jim - OIT wrote: We have a little problem with our new ZVM 5.2 system running on our new Z890. We cannot get a real ctca defined and varied online to our ZOS system running. I get a "path not operational" when a vary online path 62 to 6170 A QUERY CTCA ALL returns: q ctca all An acti

Re: Update on z/VM 5.2.0 problem

Martha, You were planning a longer test over the Easter weekend. How did it go?