Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

Well...so much for that post. Guess we will just have to wait and see what pops out. --- On Thu, 7/8/10, Dave Jones wrote: From: Dave Jones Subject: Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT' To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Date: Thursday, July 8, 2010, 1:17 PM No, it's to stop male

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

>>> On 7/8/2010 at 12:54 PM, Howard Rifkind wrote: > http://www.sys-con.com/node/1453414 > > Some information about the new Z machine(S). > > Systems people! buckle you belts. For some the ride over the last few years > has been tough but it looks like it might get even worse should this arti

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

v.uark.edu] On >>> Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L >>> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 10:13 AM >>> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU >>> Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Artical should be read 'zNEXT' >>> >>> >>> >>> Note

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 10:13 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Artical should be read 'zNEXT' Note that this article is from Maureen O'Gara, who bears the same resemblance to a journalist that an 8086 does to a z10. She's

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

redibility? From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of O'Brien, Dennis L Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 10:13 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Artical should be read 'zNEXT' Note that this article is from

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Artical should be read 'zNEXT' >Note that this article is from Maureen O'Gara, who bears the same resemblance >to a journalist that an 8086 does to a z10. She's consistently snide for no >reason, and makes things up

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Artical should be read 'zNEXT' On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Howard Rifkind wrote: Some might have already have additional information about these machines, care to share? Hmm..."Anyone care to violate their NDA and risk never hearing from IBM again,

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

On Thu, Jul 8, 2010 at 12:54 PM, Howard Rifkind wrote: > Some might have already have > additional information about these machines, care to share? > > Hmm..."Anyone care to violate their NDA and risk never hearing from IBM again, unless it's from their lawyer

Re: Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

k.edu] On Behalf Of Howard Rifkind Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2010 11:55 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Artical should be read 'zNEXT' http://www.sys-con.com/node/1453414 Some information about the new Z machine(S). Systems people! buckle you belts. For some the ride over the last fe

Artical should be read 'zNEXT'

http://www.sys-con.com/node/1453414 Some information about the new Z machine(S). Systems people! buckle you belts.  For some the ride over the last few years has been tough but it looks like it might get even worse should this article stand to have some teeth in it. Some might have already hav