On Nov 15, 2007 10:51 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> great - i got that to work in my PIPE.
> thanks for the direction.
The arithmetic in SPEC is somewhat designed after the IBM 407
Accounting Machine. You will fine a few references to that in The Book
(the "CMS/TSO Pipelines: Author's Editio
On: Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 03:20:10PM -0600,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote:
} are you refering to the Authors Edition?
Yes.
} didn't find any references to 407 emulation.
}
} or did you mean online help?
Someone posted the exact way to get the 407 info. I don't have a system
available to find it on.
great - i got that to work in my PIPE.
thanks for the direction.
prg
Phillip Gramly
Systems Programmer
Communications Data Group
Champaign, IL
The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on
11/15/2007 03:08:40 PM:
> You can issue PIPE AHELP SPECTUT and PIPE AHELP SPECREF for a tutorial
> and the SP
Rich,
are you refering to the Authors Edition?
didn't find any references to 407 emulation.
or did you mean online help?
prg
Phillip Gramly
Systems Programmer
Communications Data Group
Champaign, IL
The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on
11/15/2007 02:53:37 PM:
> On: Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 0
You can issue PIPE AHELP SPECTUT and PIPE AHELP SPECREF for a tutorial and
the SPECS reference.
A little changed pipe:
PIPE (sep !) Literal |1234.56|
! Specs FS | a: F2 . Print a*1000 PIC 99 1
! cons
And, as you seem brandnew in 407:
"a: F2 . "
means assign symbol "a" to field
On: Thu, Nov 15, 2007 at 02:43:03PM -0600,[EMAIL PROTECTED] Wrote:
} also, i don't find anything in the manual about 'print a*'
} can you explain that part of the pipe?
Phil,
Look for "407 emulation", probably in the "Authors help".
--
Rich Greenberg N Ft Myers, FL, USA richgr atsign panix.com
Phil, the best source of current PUIPE documentation is the so-called
"Author's Edition" of the documentation. You can find a current copy here:
http://vm.marist.edu/~pipeline/
Look for the section entitled "CMS/TSO Pipelines Author's Edition".
Good luck.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yes, nora i
yes, nora is correct - that is the manipulation that i need.
i have used PIPEs to convert all the | to ¦ to help in reading the
pipeline
i understand the literal stage, but the SPECS seems to not be complete
with a stage separator before it is complete.
should it be:
| SPECS FS ¦ Field 2 | a:
23
>
>
> --
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] *On
> Behalf Of *Kris Buelens
> *Sent:* Thursday, November 15, 2007 4:53 AM
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: CMS Pipelins - can SPEC reformat a field with
On Nov 15, 2007 2:35 PM, Graves Nora E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can answer the COBOL part, anyway. :-)
>
> He needs a resulting field that will appear this way for each example:
> 0 00
> 1 001000
> 12012000
> 123.4 1
IRS, Room 6513
(202) 622-6735
Fax (202) 622-3123
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2007 4:53 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: CMS Pipelins - can SPEC reformat a field
On Nov 15, 2007 10:52 AM, Kris Buelens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The silence here probably means the audience is not familiar with "COBOL
> program where the field is 9(7).9(7)". Anyhow, I don't underdstand.
It certainly explains my lack of response ;-) I suppose the poster
should look at t
The silence here probably means the audience is not familiar with "COBOL
program where the field is 9(7).9(7)". Anyhow, I don't underdstand.
I can say however that in your specs you have two things that are not
required, hence pure overhead: "PAD BLANK" is default and when padding is
with blanks
i am using pipelines to reformat a DB data dump file that has vertical
bars as field separators.
one of the fields is a dollar amount which can take any of these formats:
0
1
12
123.4
1234.56
i want to reformat this as input for a COBOL program where the field is
9(7).9(7)
can i do this in the
14 matches
Mail list logo
