org/
President - MVMUA
http://www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/
LVM Program Officer - SHARE
http://www.linkedin.com/in/BillMunson
From: James Poirier
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date: 07/12/2011 10:56 AM
Subject:CPUID Anomaly
Sent by:The IBM z/VM Operating System
Hi,
This pa
On Tuesday, 07/12/2011 at 11:10 EDT, James Poirier
wrote:
> It appears that it probably is but we made no changes to affect the
LPAR id,
> also the HMC reports
> that the CPUID is 1C8262 and that is what we used to get before this
last IPL.
Then you need to contact the Support Center. CP is
On Tuesday, 07/12/2011 at 10:56 EDT, James Poirier
wrote:
> This past weekend after an IPL of our z10 to apply RSU 5409 and a VTAM
ptf
> I discovered that the reported CPUID in zVM had changed:
>
> CPUID prior to this weedend was : FF01C82620988000
> CPUID after IPL was
It appears that it probably is but we made no changes to affect the LPAR
id, also the HMC reports
that the CPUID is 1C8262 and that is what we used to get before this last
IPL.
On 7/12/11 11:02 AM, "Tom Huegel" wrote:
> Off the top of my head isn't that the LPAR identifier? - 00 vs 01 -
>
> O
Off the top of my head isn't that the LPAR identifier? - 00 vs 01 -
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 7:51 AM, James Poirier wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This past weekend after an IPL of our z10 to apply RSU 5409 and a VTAM
> ptf
> I discovered that the reported CPUID in zVM had changed:
>
> CPUID prior to th
Hi,
This past weekend after an IPL of our z10 to apply RSU 5409 and a VTAM
ptf
I discovered that the reported CPUID in zVM had changed:
CPUID prior to this weedend was : FF01C82620988000
CPUID after IPL was : FF00C82620988000
The difference in the above
