On Tuesday, 03/15/2011 at 06:59 EDT, Kris Buelens
wrote:
> I've got a customer that performed a DRP test last weekend. The disks
at the
> DRP site are EMC, and he uses Snapshot plus PAV.
>
> The customer told me that in Jan 2010, EMC told him to define most disks
as
> unsupported, like this
On Thursday, 03/17/2011 at 04:23 EDT, "Wandschneider, Scott"
wrote:
> Did the understanding that was reached between IBM and EMC result in
> available PTFs for z/5.4 or is the support only found in z/VM 6.x?
I think it was before z/VM 5.4.
Alan Altmark
z/VM and Linux on System z Consultant
I
On Behalf
Of Wandschneider, Scott
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 3:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: EMC definitions for SnapShot & PAV
Alan,
Did the understanding that was reached between IBM and EMC result in
available PTFs for z/5.4 or is the support only found in z/VM 6
, March 15, 2011 8:00 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: EMC definitions for SnapShot & PAV
IBM and EMC came to an understanding a while back. You no longer need
to
define emc dasd as unsupported.
Regards,
Alan Altmark
IBM Lab Services
-
Sent from my BlackBerry Hand
IBM and EMC came to an understanding a while back. You no longer need to
define emc dasd as unsupported.
Regards,
Alan Altmark
IBM Lab Services
-
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.
I've got a customer that performed a DRP test last weekend. The disks at
the DRP site are EMC, and he uses Snapshot plus PAV.
The customer told me that in Jan 2010, EMC told him to define most disks as
unsupported, like this:
RDEV 5126-513B TY UNSUP DEVCL DASD DPS Y RESERVE_REL Y
But, at IPL
