z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 02:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...
> Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it'
saves $250 million consolidating Linux...
Jim wrote:
>I suspect people downloading the videos are causing some of this
problem.
When in doubt, blame the users! :)
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If
you
are not the addressee or authoriz
: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...
>
> Jim wrote:
> >I suspect people downloading the videos are causing some of
> this problem.
>
> When in doubt, blame the users! :)
>
>
>
> Marcy Cortes
>
> &q
to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...
> Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it's not working
> now. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21945.wss
We are e
Jim wrote:
>I suspect people downloading the videos are causing some of this problem.
When in doubt, blame the users! :)
Marcy Cortes
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you
must no
> Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it's not working
> now. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21945.wss
We are experiencing timeouts on the gateway servers which
front-end much of the IBM web sirte. The response to this
announcement has been huge and the server includes v
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bill Bitner
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:53 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...
Not sure what you mean by "official", but it's very likely that you'll
see more on this from IBM and thr
Not sure what you mean by "official", but it's very likely that
you'll see more on this from IBM and through other sources.
>Is there any chance IBM could possibly come out with an "official"
>announcement or publication indicating their $250M savings by
>consolidating to zSeries Linux? That migh
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 12:35 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Is there any chance IBM could possibly come out with an "official"
announcement
> or publication indicating their $250M savings by consolidating to
zSeries
> Linux? That might be a good marketing tool. Sometimes we need to
"co
U
cc
Subject
Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to
mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 09:36 EDT, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/
PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million
consolidating Linux servers on to
mainframes | NetworkWorld.com
08/0
System
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million
consolidating Linux servers on to
August, the actual article can be found here:
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
August Carideo wrote:
Virtual machines is MF VM
VMware is like lparing
on the MF lparing did away for the need for VM at some shops instead of
running 3 virt machines under VM , run 3 lpars etc
wher
ARK.EDU> Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million
consolidating Linux servers on to
mainframes | NetworkWorld.com
08/01/2007 09:36 Community
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 09:36 EDT, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
> > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
> This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed
> that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR
Macioce, Larry wrote:
But isn't lparing a VM technology??
Larry
Yes - LPAR and z/VM share a common ancestor, and there's still some of
my own code in LPAR from wy back, but these days they are very
different beasts.
Ray M
AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on
to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community
Dave Jones wrote:
> And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely a
#x27;ve been saying since 1982: Ain't VM grand?
Brings a tear to my eye. Think I'll quit work for the day and contemplate the
great void.
David
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Dave Jones
Sent: Wed 8/1/2007 9:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
z/VM Operating System on behalf of Dave Jones
Sent: Wed 8/1/2007 9:28 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to
mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community
And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/V
On 8/1/07, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
> This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed
> that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR was touted as
> being IBM's "premier virtualisat
But isn't lparing a VM technology??
Larry
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ray Mansell
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:35 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux serve
Dave Jones wrote:
And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed
that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR was touted as
being IBM's "premier virtualisation product" - not that I have anything
And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM..
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998
--
--
DJ
V/Soft
23 matches
Mail list logo