Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Imler, Steven J
z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jim Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 02:21 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux... > Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it'

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Schuh, Richard
saves $250 million consolidating Linux... Jim wrote: >I suspect people downloading the videos are causing some of this problem. When in doubt, blame the users! :) Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authoriz

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Marty Zimelis
: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux... > > Jim wrote: > >I suspect people downloading the videos are causing some of > this problem. > > When in doubt, blame the users! :) > > > > Marcy Cortes > > &q

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Mike Walter
to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux... > Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it's not working > now. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21945.wss We are e

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Marcy Cortes
Jim wrote: >I suspect people downloading the videos are causing some of this problem. When in doubt, blame the users! :) Marcy Cortes "This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must no

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Jim Elliott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Well this worked earlier today. Don't know why it's not working > now. http://www-03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/21945.wss We are experiencing timeouts on the gateway servers which front-end much of the IBM web sirte. The response to this announcement has been huge and the server includes v

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Feller, Paul
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bill Bitner Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 11:53 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux... Not sure what you mean by "official", but it's very likely that you'll see more on this from IBM and thr

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux...

2007-08-01 Thread Bill Bitner
Not sure what you mean by "official", but it's very likely that you'll see more on this from IBM and through other sources. >Is there any chance IBM could possibly come out with an "official" >announcement or publication indicating their $250M savings by >consolidating to zSeries Linux? That migh

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 12:35 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Is there any chance IBM could possibly come out with an "official" announcement > or publication indicating their $250M savings by consolidating to zSeries > Linux? That might be a good marketing tool. Sometimes we need to "co

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread pfa
U cc Subject Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 09:36 EDT, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread August Carideo
PROTECTED] Subject ARK.EDU> Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com 08/0

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread August Carideo
System <[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject ARK.EDU> Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Dave Jones
August, the actual article can be found here: http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998 August Carideo wrote: Virtual machines is MF VM VMware is like lparing on the MF lparing did away for the need for VM at some shops instead of running 3 virt machines under VM , run 3 lpars etc wher

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread August Carideo
ARK.EDU> Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com 08/01/2007 09:36 Community

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/01/2007 at 09:36 EDT, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dave Jones wrote: > > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM.. > This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed > that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Ray Mansell
Macioce, Larry wrote: But isn't lparing a VM technology?? Larry Yes - LPAR and z/VM share a common ancestor, and there's still some of my own code in LPAR from wy back, but these days they are very different beasts. Ray M

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Stephen Buckles
AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community Dave Jones wrote: > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM.. This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely a

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Dave Jones
#x27;ve been saying since 1982: Ain't VM grand? Brings a tear to my eye. Think I'll quit work for the day and contemplate the great void. David -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Dave Jones Sent: Wed 8/1/2007 9:28 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread David Kreuter
z/VM Operating System on behalf of Dave Jones Sent: Wed 8/1/2007 9:28 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: [IBMVM] FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/V

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Rob van der Heij
On 8/1/07, Ray Mansell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM.. > This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed > that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR was touted as > being IBM's "premier virtualisat

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Macioce, Larry
But isn't lparing a VM technology?? Larry -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ray Mansell Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2007 9:35 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux serve

Re: FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Ray Mansell
Dave Jones wrote: And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM.. This was just circulated internally, too, and I was extremely annoyed that z/VM wasn't mentioned (although I note that LPAR was touted as being IBM's "premier virtualisation product" - not that I have anything

FW: IBM saves $250 million consolidating Linux servers on to mainframes | NetworkWorld.com Community

2007-08-01 Thread Dave Jones
And I suspect that these Linux servers will be hosted on z/VM.. http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/17998 -- -- DJ V/Soft