Rob,
Since we used the internal CODEPRTX to produce pretty xref
listings that flagged Set But Not Used and Used But Not Set
and SUPERC for code reviews, we didn't use Signal On
Novalue. In general, however, it is a good practice.
Les
Rob van der Heij wrote:
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:36 PM,
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Les Koehler wrote:
> Back before I retired, we always taught and followed these rules for Rexx:
0. signal on novalue (even when you don't bother to have a novalue: label)
half of my hard rexx problems would have caught way earlier with that
Rob
ng System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:19 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: NETSTAT and PIPES
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Feller, Paul
wrote:
Is this what you are trying to do?
'pipe command NETSTAT TELNET | stem sv
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Feller, Paul
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:53 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: NETSTAT and PIPES
Is this what you are trying to do?
'pipe command NETSTAT TELNET | stem sve1.'
'pipe stem sve1
ltmark
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 9:21 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: NETSTAT and PIPES
On Tuesday, 07/14/2009 at 08:53 EDT, "Gentry, Stephen"
wrote:
> Yes, that is what I?m trying to do and it works. That is to say the
pipe doesn?t
> abend or fail. What happens i
d to do further processing with
the stem
Steve
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2009 3:19 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: NETSTAT and PIPES
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:
On Tuesday, 07/14/2009 at 08:53 EDT, "Gentry, Stephen"
wrote:
> Yes, that is what I?m trying to do and it works. That is to say the
pipe doesn?t
> abend or fail. What happens is I get different results when I run it
from
> an EXEC (with the PIPE command in it) vs. when I run it from the
co
The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Feller, Paul
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 9:53 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: NETSTAT and PIPES
Is this what you are trying to do?
'pipe command NETSTAT TELNET | stem sve1.'
'pipe
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Feller, Paul wrote:
> Is this what you are trying to do?
>
>
>
> 'pipe command NETSTAT TELNET | stem sve1.'
>
> 'pipe stem sve1. | > sve TEXT A'
>
> 'browse sve TEXT A'
If so, then it is probably more practical to do - straight from the command line
pipe command
du] On Behalf
Of Gentry, Stephen
Sent: Sunday, July 12, 2009 8:48 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: NETSTAT and PIPES
(I tried to post this to the cms pipes list but it was rejected)
I have a simple EXEC that pipes the output of the NETSTAT command to a stem.
If I issue NETSTAT in a normal CM
On Monday, 07/13/2009 at 02:16 EDT, "Gentry, Stephen"
wrote:
> Running it using your suggestions causes the following:
>
> [IMAGE]
The listserver doesn't redistribute attachments. A plain-text copy/paste
is sufficient.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
k.edu] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Monday, July 13, 2009 2:24 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: NETSTAT and PIPES
Coding "PIPE CMS xxx" is exactly the same as coding "address CMS '
..."
That is, CMS performs the full command resolution, and an EXEC w
On Monday, 07/13/2009 at 12:23 EDT, "Gentry, Stephen"
wrote:
> I have a simple EXEC that pipes the output of the NETSTAT command to a
stem.
>
> If I issue NETSTAT in a normal CMS session, I get the results back that
I
> expect.
>
> When run it in an EXEC containing a PIPE, I get errors from
Coding "PIPE CMS xxx" is exactly the same as coding "address CMS ' ..."
That is, CMS performs the full command resolution, and an EXEC will
get selected instead of a MODULE.
Therefore it is recommended to use address COMMAND and PIPE COMMAND.
Even more: you should not abbreviate a CMS command,
(I tried to post this to the cms pipes list but it was rejected)
I have a simple EXEC that pipes the output of the NETSTAT command to a
stem.
If I issue NETSTAT in a normal CMS session, I get the results back that
I expect.
When run it in an EXEC containing a PIPE, I get errors from the NETST
15 matches
Mail list logo
