;> zTUNE for a VERY low (not free) price.
>>
>> This provides the ability to completely monitor your z/VM, your Linux,
>> your MS Servers, your Blade servers, and even your VSE servers. And we put
>> someone on site for a day at no cost to make sure your "starter kit&qu
ervers. And we put
> someone on site for a day at no cost to make sure your "starter kit" gets
> started
>
> Hughes, Jim wrote:
>
>> Is the VM Performance Toolkit a free product from IBM?
>>
>>
>> Jim Hughes
>> Consulti
your z/VM, your Linux,
your MS Servers, your Blade servers, and even your VSE servers. And we
put someone on site for a day at no cost to make sure your "starter kit"
gets started
Hughes, Jim wrote:
Is the VM Performance Toolkit a free product from IBM?
J
tra money needed if you
> enable it and use it. :-)We WANT you to use it - please ?
>
> Scott Rohling
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Hughes, Jim wrote:
>
>> Is the VM Performance Toolkit a free product from IBM?
>>
>>
>
It comes with the z/VM license .. yes. No extra money needed if you
enable it and use it. :-)We WANT you to use it - please ?
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Hughes, Jim wrote:
> Is the VM Performance Toolkit a free product from IBM?
>
> _
Hi, Jim.
No, the Performance Toolkit is not a free product; while it comes
pre-installed with z/VM, there is as additional license fee involved if
you wish to deploy it. IMHO, the addition license fee is quite
reasonable, too.
DJ
On 03/09/2011 08:32 AM, Hughes, Jim wrote:
> Is the
Is the VM Performance Toolkit a free product from IBM?
Jim Hughes
Consulting Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New Hampshire
27 Hazen Drive
Concord, NH 03301
603-271-5586Fax 603.271.1516
Statement of
You set S reset events. I've got an exec that can calculate the records for
a period you give.
And, I've got other code to make graphics with GDDM and CMS/GUI (like
pagerate of the system and/or a user). But that still is not finished.
Part of it are execs that read the created summary files, tra
I've read the doc, but don't seem to be able to
find it or understand it, but how do you create a
summary file in Perfkit?
Billy
0---If I remember correctly, I wrote a small REXX
EXEC to prune that trendfile. A small modif would allo
From:
Kris Buelens
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
01/11/2010 14:33
Subject:
Re: Performance Toolkit archiving
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating System
__
--->
| Date: |
|>
>--|
|01/11/2010 14:33
|
>------|
|&g
f *Michael Donovan
> *Sent:* Monday, November 01, 2010 10:25 AM
>
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: Performance Toolkit archiving
>
>
>
> Frank,
>
> You should look at the FCONTROL SETTINGS subcommand and its TRDFILID and
> SUMFILID and on how to chan
lf Of Michael Donovan
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:25 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit archiving
Frank,
You should look at the FCONTROL SETTINGS subcommand and its TRDFILID and
SUMFILID and on how to change file ids for the trend and summary files.
These comman
|
|>
| Subject: |
|>
>------------
I have two files that increasingly get bigger. What do I use to archive
the contents of these files?
MKMFVM FCXTREND T1
ACUM HISTSUM T1
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer
MCP, MCP+I, MCSE & RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co.
Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acr
l the information on the "userids" and "userid classes" at 10
minutes interval.
The fun part on doing the data analysis begins...
Thanks to all of you for your help and advice.
Regards,
Michel Beaulieu
Montreal, Canada
|*|
> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010
This isn't a Perfkit answer, but you could create an accounting record every
10 minutes. It would have the CPU usage data for the previous 10 minute
interval. If it is only a few virtual machines, then instead of running
ACNT ALL for all machines, just run 'ACNT userid' for each user that you
wan
etween two times. Years between 1942 and *
* 2041 supported. *
* Component of - N/A *
* Command format- See Explain routine above. *
*
e IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2010 11:19 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: zVM Performance Toolkit: Can I record/report CPU by userid
using 10 minutes interval?
Converting the time:
DateConv 5.8 TODABS REX
Regards,
>
>
> Michel Beaulieu
> Montreal, Canada
> |*|
>
> --
> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:18:09 -0500
> From: framaek...@ailife.com
> Subject: Re: zVM Performance Toolkit: Can I record/report CPU by userid
> using 10 min
o convert the TOD field. (That should
not be too hard)
I will keep you and this list informed on my progress.
Regards,
Michel Beaulieu
Montreal, Canada
|*|
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2010 07:18:09 -0500
From: framaek...@ailife.com
Subject: Re: zVM Performance Toolkit: Can I record/
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: zVM Performance Toolkit: Can I record/report CPU by userid
using 10 minutes interval?
Good day,
I am trying to do something that seems to me a good challenge to do with
z/VM performance toolkit.
The end result that I want to have is a set of records for a selected
number
ords per day per virtual
> machine.
>
> Accumulating that over many months, I can load that data in my favorite
> spreadsheet
> and do all kind of numerical analysis.
>
> I am trying to use z/VM Performance Toolkit to help me to do that and I am
> stuck!
>
> The best I c
Good day,
I am trying to do something that seems to me a good challenge to do with z/VM
performance toolkit.
The end result that I want to have is a set of records for a selected number of
userids.
Each record would be for a 10 minutes interval.
format:
mmdd hhmm
I'm setting up Performance Toolkit according to the instructions in
"Getting Started with Linux on System z" for z/VM 5.4.0. This is just
for a proof of concept, so I'm starting with the defaults. The PROFILE
EXEC for MONWRITE on page 144 contains the following MONITOR
Thanks, John!!!
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of John Harris
Sent: Saturday, April 04, 2009 6:57 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit question
Hi Alyce
Try http://www-03
bm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/zvmpdf/
Regards
John Harris
IBM
-- Original Message --
Received: 06:22 PM EDT, 04/03/2009
From: "Austin, Alyce (CIV)" <aus...@nps.edu>
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit question
I&#x
Hi Alyce
Try http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/zvmpdf/
Regards
John Harris
IBM
-- Original Message --
Received: 06:22 PM EDT, 04/03/2009
From: "Austin, Alyce (CIV)"
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit question
No, Alyce. They're in the usual place for IBM VM publications:
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/hcsh
Have a good one.
Austin, Alyce (CIV) wrote:
I'm trying to find the z/VM 5.4 Performance Toolkit references.
I've only been successful in finding
I'm trying to find the z/VM 5.4 Performance Toolkit references.
I've only been successful in finding the one for 5.3.
Are they in a special place?
Thanks,
Alyce
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rich Sm
After three days you have to do your own aging of the history files with the FCXRENAM
EXEC. Make sure you have enough disk space.
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
I'm doing a FC BENCHMARK for some userid that we are going to do some
changes to. Is there a way of keeping more than 3 generations of the
his
I'm doing a FC BENCHMARK for some userid that we are going to do some
changes to. Is there a way of keeping more than 3 generations of the
history files? Can that be specified or controlled someway in FCONX
$PROFILE?
Jim
--
Jim Bohnsack
Cornell University
(972) 596-6377 home/office
(972) 34
ced by S&W.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
> -Original Message-
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John P. Baker
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:51 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Allocating Cyl Zero as P
: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 5:35 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Allocating Cyl Zero as Perm (Was: Performance toolkit under zVM
5.3)
I have never seen a problem with CP stepping on the Label. I have
stepped on it myself and seen other inexperienced people step on it.
That is why I always
Correct, the allocation of a minidisk does not affect the volume label,
the allocation bitmap or it use by CP for paging, spooling, online
directory or warmstart. The allocation of a minidisk helps keep the the
bookkeeping straight. It is hard for DIRMAP or DISKMAP to tell my
replacement where
STSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Allocating Cyl Zero as Perm (Was: Performance
> toolkit under zVM 5.3)
>
> Yes, I also have placeholders for $PAGE$, $SPOOL$, $TDISK$,
> $DIRECT$ and MVSDASD. But that is a different "best practices" item.
>
> /Tom Kern
>
> Schuh,
Yes, I also have placeholders for $PAGE$, $SPOOL$, $TDISK$, $DIRECT$ and
MVSDASD. But that is a different "best practices" item.
/Tom Kern
Schuh, Richard wrote:
That is why I said, "Granted, for all other devices, it is best to
allocate cylinder 0 as perm. There you have a guarantee that the v
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Thomas Kern
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 2:35 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Allocating Cyl Zero as Perm (Was: Performance
> toolkit under zVM 5.3)
>
> I have never seen a problem wit
I have never seen a problem with CP stepping on the Label. I have
stepped on it myself and seen other inexperienced people step on it.
That is why I always allocate cylinder zero of a VM volume as perm and
allocate a one cylinder minidisk owned by VMDASD there. That is the
"best practices" guide
: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: Performance toolkit under zVM 5.3...Looking to
> see a snap shot of CPU utilization and Storage Utilization
>
> You don't _have_ to wait for evening. CP permits you to
> CPFMTXA spare DASD, and add them on the fly.
> Whole DASD volumes
arily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.
"Hamilton, Brian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System"
06/24/2008 03:13 PM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
e-mail
and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Hamilton, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 1:14 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Performance toolkit under zV
ailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Marcy Cortes
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:41 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance toolkit under zVM 5.3...Looking to see a snap
shot of CPU utilization and Storage Utilization
First, get that 73% number to < 50% ASAP.
Marcy
"
l
> and delete this message. Thank you for your cooperation."
>
>
>
>
>
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Hamilton, Brian
> Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:23 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK
n, Brian
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 12:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Performance toolkit under zVM 5.3...Looking to see
a snap shot of CPU utilization and Storage Utilization
Thanks everyone,
Under option #2 it shows a Storage utilization of 89% and through CMS i
were to summarize this out of 8gb real storage assigned to the
lpar performance toolkit is showing 89% usage.
And from my 3 page volumes I’m using 73%.
Sound right.
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
http://w
ehalf of Hamilton, Brian
Sent: Tue 6/24/2008 3:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] Performance toolkit under zVM 5.3...Looking to see a snap
shot of CPU utilization and Storage Utilization
Thanks everyone,
Under option #2 it shows a Storage utilization of 89% and through CMS
: Performance toolkit under zVM 5.3...Looking to see
a snap shot of CPU utilization and Storage Utilization
Thanks everyone,
Under option #2 it shows a Storage utilization of 89% and
through CMS if I issue the command q alloc page I see that over 3 3390
mod 3
Thanks everyone,
Under option #2 it shows a Storage utilization of 89% and through CMS if
I issue the command q alloc page I see that over 3 3390 mod 3's I have a
utilization of 73%.
So if I were to summarize this out of 8gb real storage assigned to the
lpar performance toolkit is sh
The IBM z/VM Operating System
06/24/2008 02:30 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Performance toolkit under zVM 5.3...Looking to see a snap shot of CPU
utilization and Storage Utilization
Hi,
Looking to find some where on o
your workload, it MAY be an indication of a storage management
problem. But, it may just be a matter of examining how storage is
allocated and making better use of it.
Hamilton, Brian wrote:
Hi,
Looking to find some where on one of the performance toolkit screen
something that will show m
ation doesn't really tell us all that much in
most circumstances.
David
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Hamilton, Brian
Sent: Tue 6/24/2008 2:30 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] Performance toolkit under zVM 5.3...Looking to see a
Hi,
Looking to find some where on one of the performance toolkit screen
something that will show me the overall CPU utilization and Storage
utilization.
We are trying to determine if another IFL is needed or more real storage
on the box.
Thanks
Brian
n Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Knutson, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The Performance Toolkit documentation talks about identify yourself as a
> mandatory step.
>
> Is there any way to accomplish this or has anyone already requested this
> as an enhancement?
Gregg Reed
"No Plan, survives execution"
Hi,
Coming from a z/OS background I have the RMF Data Portal deployed and we
allow anyone inside our network to view it. I would like to deploy the
z/VM Performance Toolkit web interface in the same way. I cannot find
anyway to allow this.
In RMF DDS SYS1.PARMLIB(GPMSRV00
On Wednesday, 01/09/2008 at 10:14 EST, Eginhard Jaeger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But PTK was designed to always run and provide also performance data for
any
> old VM release, back to VM/XA, and it certainly used to do so not so
very
> long ago. Has that really changed?
>From a design perspe
On Tuesday, 01/08/2008 at 07:16 EST, Raymond Noal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Do any of you run the z/VM 5.3.0 version of PTK on prior (5.1.0)
systems? Is
this doable?
No. PTK is customized to each release.
But PTK was designed to always run and provide also performance data for any
old VM
L PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Raymond Noal
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2008 7:16 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: z/VM Performance Toolkit for various z/VM 5.x releases
Dear List:
We are in the process of negotiating a license for IBM's z/VM
Performance Toolkit (PTK). I know that my current r
On Tuesday, 01/08/2008 at 07:16 EST, Raymond Noal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Do any of you run the z/VM 5.3.0 version of PTK on prior (5.1.0)
systems? Is
> this doable?
No. PTK is customized to each release.
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
f a
5.3 CP, and you give it another CP level...
I would recommend to use the PTK level that came with 5.1.
2008/1/9, Raymond Noal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> Dear List:
>
> We are in the process of negotiating a license for IBM's z/VM Performance
> Toolkit (PTK). I
Dear List:
We are in the process of negotiating a license for IBM's z/VM
Performance Toolkit (PTK). I know that my current release of z/VM being
5.3.0 already ships the PTK as a disabled product in the SYSTEM CONFIG
file.
However, the first project that we need the PTK for will be on our
Re: Performance Toolkit: DCSS size too smallAs Kris has already written, this
has nothing to do with the increased minidisk size. The messages suggest that
something else may have happened at the same time:
- either a lot of additional I/O devices (more DASD?) were added in the
meantime,
- or
So, open a problem with the IBM support center.
Kris
2007/7/11, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Update: Increasing the virtual memory size of the PERFSVM userid solved
the problem. I wish PerfKit gave more useful messages I've been chasing
the wrong problem all day.
--
.~.Robert P. Nix
Update: Increasing the virtual memory size of the PERFSVM userid solved the
problem. I wish PerfKit gave more useful messages I¹ve been chasing the
wrong problem all day.
--
.~.Robert P. Nix Mayo Foundation
/V\RO-OE-5-55 200 First Street SW
/ ( ) \ 507
I agree in theory, but a) PERFSVM was running just before I increased the
size of the minidisks, and gets the DCSS size too small message after
increasing the size of the minidisk. And b) increasing the size of the DCSS
hasn¹t won me any points with PERFSVM or *MONITOR either. What I¹m seeing
now i
This is not related the size of a minidisk, but the size of a DisContiguous
Saved Segment, a piece of virtual storage, in this case shared between CP
(that stores the performance data in it ) and PERFSVM that retrieves them
out of it.
It is created by issuing DEFSEG MONDCSS sss-eee SC (I'm a bi
We¹ve been running PerfKit for quite some time, and the 191 disk got too
small for the trend data. I brought down both PERFSVM virtual machines (we
run two CECs and CSE), created new, larger disks, and set up the PERFSVM¹s
to use them, and then xautolog¹ed both PERFSVMs.
Now, both are getting the
Performance Toolkit FCXTREND file
We've been running the Performance Toolkit since October, and the
FCXTREND file is getting a bit large. I wrote a pipeline
to break this file down into monthly segments, and thought I had a way
of using them via the FCXSUM command, documented in the m
On 3/13/07, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If not, then I just spent a day writing a slick exec that will give me
monthly files to delete instead of the one big file :-(
Keep it. We just need the Piper to get us CMS Pipelines for Windows
and I can finally deal with the "file is to big
We¹ve been running the Performance Toolkit since October, and the
FCXTREND file is getting a bit large. I wrote a pipeline to break this file
down into monthly segments, and thought I had a way of using them via the
FCXSUM command, documented in the manual... But once I got to that point,
there
I would be very interested in tools to report on and prune the FCXTREND
file. I
usually have to use xedit to separate this file by months. Any help would
be
appreciated.
/Tom Kern
I currently don't have any additional tools to report on FCXTREND files,
beyond
what PerfKit already allows you
I would be very interested in tools to report on and prune the FCXTREND file. I
usually have to use xedit to separate this file by months. Any help would be
appreciated.
/Tom Kern
--- Eginhard Jaeger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >As time marches on the size of our Performance Tool
As time marches on the size of our Performance Toolkit FCXTREND file
gets larger and larger. I can't seem to figure out how to "trim" this
file, so that (perhaps) only a few weeks or months data is kept
(depending on the system's purpose). How is that done?
You can just re
As time marches on the size of our Performance Toolkit FCXTREND file
gets larger and larger. I can't seem to figure out how to "trim" this
file, so that (perhaps) only a few weeks or months data is kept
(depending on the system's purpose). How is that done?
5:31 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit and VM64152
Hello,
I'm installing z/VM 5.2; however, I'm only using RTM on my z/VM 4.4.
system.
Do I need to apply this fix to 5.2 even though I'm not running PTK on my
current system?
he IBM z/VM Operating System
01/18/2007 05:56 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Performance Toolkit and VM64152
Hello again,
I will be runniing PTK on my new z/VM 5.2 system for the first time.
I understand that RTM will not work on
Correct. RTM will not run on z/VM 5.2.0. Since you will be running
Performance
Toolkit on your 5.2.0 system, you should install VM64152/UM31956 to
Performance
Toolkit before trying to bring it up.
Mike Donovan
Donovan
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 2:44 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit and VM64152
This fix only pertains to Performance Toolkit. If you are not running
Performance
Toolkit, you do not need this fix.
Thanks!
Mike
This fix only pertains to Performance Toolkit. If you are not running
Performance
Toolkit, you do not need this fix.
Thanks!
Mike
---
Law of Logical Argument: Anything is possible if you don't know what you
are talking
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Michael Donovan
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2007 1:07 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit and VM64152
As Roger noted earlier today, the 5.1.0 and 5.2.0 PTFs are now available
for the subject APAR.
Anyone who is still on z/VM 4.4.
As Roger noted earlier today, the 5.1.0 and 5.2.0 PTFs are now available
for the subject APAR.
Anyone who is still on z/VM 4.4.0 and needs the update for this problem
while they are migrating
off z/VM 4.4.0 can obtain a copy of the 4.4.0 change at
http://www.vm.ibm.com/related/perfkit/perf44
Greetings Perfkit users,
APAR VM64152 is now CLOSED and has the following PTF's available:
Perfkit R510 - UM31956
Perfkit R520 - UM31957
We will be ordering this COR for those that have PMR's opened with
us, and it is highly recommended that other users please get
this 'official fix' to run with.
Even though I do not run R440, I applaude your efforts in releasing this
PERFKIT fix. Having such a useful component of my system "dead in the wat
er"
during a migration would leave a very bad feeling towards the vendor.
Congradulations on doing the right thing.
/Tom Kern
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 10
Folks, R440 is OUT OF SERVICE, and if you want "extended service" for R44
0
then let us know and we can get someone to contact you.
Thie particular PERFKIT R440 "fix" is something we discussed quite a
bit 'in-house' and thought it was the 'right thing' to make this availabl
e
to our Perfkit R440
Kurt Acker wrote:
Greetings Perfkit users and ListServ followers,
PERF440 PACKMOD has been placed back on the FTP with the other mods.
For our records, we would still like customers to open PMR's at all
release levels. Please also note that the r440 version will not
become an official part
ect
Re: VM64152 Re: Performance Toolkit
Kurt,
I did open an ETR on IBMLink but got a phone call saying since the product
was no longer supported they would not forward the problem for support to
look at. I was told a valid SE contract was necessary. The ETR was closed.
Ron
On 1/16/07
TECTED]>*
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
01/16/2007 12:29 PM Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc
Subject
Re: Performance Toolkit
The actual APAR number is VM64152.
However, the part about a PERF440 PACKMOD is not mentioned in the
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
01/16/2007 12:29 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Performance Toolkit
The actual APAR number is VM64152.
However, the part about a PERF440 PACKMOD is not mentioned
01/16/2007 12:29 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Performance Toolkit
The actual APAR number is VM64152.
However, the part about a PERF440 PACKMOD is not mentioned in the APAR,
nor is the file available today on the testcase FT
The actual APAR number is VM64152.
However, the part about a PERF440 PACKMOD is not mentioned in the APAR,
nor is the file available today on the testcase FTP site mentioned by Mik
e
yesterday.
Can anyone who got the module before it disppeared make it available?
A small & quick test reveals to what it corresponds
pipe strliteral xC000!dateconv todabs REXXn Timeout!cons
13 Jan 2007 18:55:20.527872
This is at
q timezone
Zone Direction Offset Status
WIN East 01.00.00 Active
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
2007/
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> Re: Performance Toolkit
Ladies and gentlemen,
It has been brought to my attention that the APAR for PERFKIT's TOD glitch
is
VM64142. PTFs to follow as soon as possible.
Thanks!
Mike Donovan
> Just out of curiosity, is this something that hits every PerfTK user in
> the world?
Well, it repeatedly hit every one of the LPARs running on our z800, and the
IFL on our z990, but NOT ONCE on our z9 IFL. The downloaded module has
worked flawlessly.
Mark Wheeler, 3M Company
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subj=
ect
ARK.EDU> Performance Toolkit =
=
p; C°
Belgium
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kurt
Acker
Sent: maandag 15 januari 2007 17:38
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Performance Toolkit
Mike had beat me to this post. Please direct PMR's to z/V
11:19 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Performance Toolkit
Sorry if I am being thick but can you tell me the exact FTP site that I
need to address for this?
Thanks
Colin Allinson
Amadeus Data Processing
Michael Donovan &
;[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU> Re: Performance Toolkit
Sorry if I am being thick but can you tell me the exact FTP site that I
need to address for this?
Thanks
Colin Allinson
Amadeus Data Processing
Michael Donovan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :-
It appears you have run into the same problem one of our internal accounts
encountered yesterday.
It appe
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
