Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-22 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 9:11 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: HiperSockets Question On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 09:54 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After a lot of effort we found that there was an extra route in th

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-22 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 09:54 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After a lot of effort we found that there was an extra route in the > Linux routing table that sent the data bound for one of the z/OS LPARS > over to our z/VM where it then was routed by the TCP

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
al Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:39 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: HiperSockets Question On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 03:43 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)" <[

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Thomas Kern
He was El Zorro. And Quickdraw McGraw was El Kabong. The 'El' does make a difference. /Tom Kern Alan Altmark wrote: > On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 07:51 EDT, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> Isn't that Sir Alan da Weasel? :) > > Please. Was Zorro, "Don Zorro"? I think not. > >

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 07:51 EDT, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Isn't that Sir Alan da Weasel? :) Please. Was Zorro, "Don Zorro"? I think not. Alan da Weasel

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Rich Smrcina
Isn't that Sir Alan da Weasel? :) Alan Altmark wrote: Alan da Weasel -- Rich Smrcina VM Assist, Inc. Phone: 414-491-6001 Ans Service: 360-715-2467 rich.smrcina at vmassist.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19,

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Nick Laflamme
At 07:09 PM 8/20/2008 -0400, Alan Altmark wrote: I *knew* I'd regret not diving into nitty gritty details. I KNEW IT. Mr. Smartypants. Couldn't let it go, could you? We were in the middle of a *point*. DTCMPY001S Nobody ever expects the Spanish Inquisition.

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 04:44 EDT, Miguel Delapaz/Endicott/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > If you wanted to get nitpicky, it would actually need 3 fragments to account > for the extra IP header(s). :-) I *knew* I'd regret not diving into nitty gritty details. I KNEW IT. Mr. Smartypants. Co

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Miguel Delapaz
If you wanted to get nitpicky, it would actually need 3 fragments to account for the extra IP header(s). :-) Regards, Miguel Delapaz z/VM TCP/IP Development The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 08/20/2008 01:38:48 PM: > > Yes and no. :-) > > It won't be truncated, but it will be fragmented

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Miguel Delapaz
Packet fragmentation is done in the TCP/IP stack. The stack will chunk the packet up into smaller packets before sending it over the HiperSockets device. Regards, Miguel Delapaz z/VM TCP/IP Development The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 08/20/2008 12:40:47 PM: > [image removed] > > HiperS

Re: HiperSockets Question

2008-08-20 Thread Alan Altmark
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 03:43 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I am using HiperSockets and my MTU size is 1500 and a pass a packet size of > 2000 will the data in the packet be truncated since it is bigger than 1500? I > thought I read that since Hip