Alan Altmark
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2008 9:11 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: HiperSockets Question
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 09:54 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR)
(CTR)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a lot of effort we found that there was an extra route in th
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 09:54 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After a lot of effort we found that there was an extra route in the
> Linux routing table that sent the data bound for one of the z/OS LPARS
> over to our z/VM where it then was routed by the TCP
al Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 4:39 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: HiperSockets Question
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 03:43 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR)
(CTR)"
<[
He was El Zorro.
And Quickdraw McGraw was El Kabong.
The 'El' does make a difference.
/Tom Kern
Alan Altmark wrote:
> On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 07:51 EDT, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> Isn't that Sir Alan da Weasel? :)
>
> Please. Was Zorro, "Don Zorro"? I think not.
>
>
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 07:51 EDT, Rich Smrcina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Isn't that Sir Alan da Weasel? :)
Please. Was Zorro, "Don Zorro"? I think not.
Alan da Weasel
Isn't that Sir Alan da Weasel? :)
Alan Altmark wrote:
Alan da Weasel
--
Rich Smrcina
VM Assist, Inc.
Phone: 414-491-6001
Ans Service: 360-715-2467
rich.smrcina at vmassist.com
http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina
Catch the WAVV! http://www.wavv.org
WAVV 2009 - Orlando, FL - May 15-19,
At 07:09 PM 8/20/2008 -0400, Alan Altmark wrote:
I *knew* I'd regret not diving into nitty gritty details. I KNEW IT. Mr.
Smartypants. Couldn't let it go, could you? We were in the middle of a
*point*.
DTCMPY001S Nobody ever expects the Spanish Inquisition.
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 04:44 EDT, Miguel Delapaz/Endicott/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]
wrote:
> If you wanted to get nitpicky, it would actually need 3 fragments to
account
> for the extra IP header(s). :-)
I *knew* I'd regret not diving into nitty gritty details. I KNEW IT. Mr.
Smartypants. Co
If you wanted to get nitpicky, it would actually need 3 fragments to
account for the extra IP header(s). :-)
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 08/20/2008
01:38:48 PM:
>
> Yes and no. :-)
>
> It won't be truncated, but it will be fragmented
Packet fragmentation is done in the TCP/IP stack. The stack will chunk the
packet up into smaller packets before sending it over the HiperSockets
device.
Regards,
Miguel Delapaz
z/VM TCP/IP Development
The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 08/20/2008
12:40:47 PM:
> [image removed]
>
> HiperS
On Wednesday, 08/20/2008 at 03:43 EDT, "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I am using HiperSockets and my MTU size is 1500 and a pass a packet
size of
> 2000 will the data in the packet be truncated since it is bigger than
1500? I
> thought I read that since Hip
11 matches
Mail list logo