Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-10 Thread Schuh, Richard
.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Brian Nielsen > Sent: Tuesday, March 10, 2009 7:26 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! > > I remember a couple HDA failures caused by the raised floor > layout. The = > > cold air was venting up directly

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-10 Thread Brian Nielsen
> > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System >[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Wade > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:27 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! > > > >

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Jim Bohnsack
__ From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Wade Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:27 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! =09 =09 I remember having a 3370 (I thi

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Marcy Cortes
: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! I remember having a 3370 (I think) replaced on a 4331. The CE said the reason the MAP ran for so many pages was that the Head and Drive assembly (HDA) was the most expensive part of the drive, so th

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Schuh, Richard
Schuh From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Dave Wade Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 4:27 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! I remember having a

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Dave Wade
...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David Boyes Sent: 09 March 2009 15:47 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! The 308x had a FBA device for the support processor to use. Wasn't customer accessible, though. I remember helping a CE replace one once wh

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Schuh, Richard
Ah, but which impossibilities are they working to turn into realities? Regards, Richard Schuh > > "Impossible" is just hyperbole for "No one ever did the > work." See that faint glow on the distant horizon? That's > the visible energy given off by elves turning the > "Impossible" into

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Alan Altmark
On Monday, 03/09/2009 at 02:15 EDT, Kris Buelens wrote: > - VSAM has the ability to store (replicate?) the lowest level index > set in front of the track where the data reside. This to avoid seek, > the idea was that the higher level index blocks would be buffered in > storage. But, who cares/w

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Bob Levad
eadyBoost. Bob -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Jeff Kennedy Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 12:08 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! The 3090 had a complete 4331 for a support process

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Tom Duerbusch
That seems to imply that the x-link part of CSE can't be on FCP attached drives... I thought I've read that z/VM can be installed entirely on FCP attached drives. But I didn't read that much in detail if there were functions that wouldn't work in that world. Perhaps a future release would addr

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Kris Buelens
Shall I plead a tiny bit for CKD? - VSAM has the ability to store (replicate?) the lowest level index set in front of the track where the data reside. This to avoid seek, the idea was that the higher level index blocks would be buffered in storage. But, who cares/who has time nowadays to get that

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Jeff Kennedy
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! I believe that the 3090 or something similar. It has been awhile since the CE and I talked about devices. Ed Martin Aultman Health Foundation 330-588-4723 ext 40441 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread David Boyes
The 308x had a FBA device for the support processor to use. Wasn't customer accessible, though. I remember helping a CE replace one once when it failed on a 3081D. Messy. The MAP ran for tens of pages. On 3/9/09 11:42 AM, "Edward M Martin" wrote: I believe that the 3090 or something similar

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Nick Laflamme
I'll take "What are 3090s?" for $100, Alex. As I recall, their VM-lite hypervisor (was it already called PR/SM?) used 3310s. I don't think 308x's did, but I'm not sure. Don't get me started about the time the outsourcing company I worked for agreed to migrate a 9370 VM/VSE customer onto a 3090

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Edward M Martin
: Monday, March 09, 2009 11:22 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! Which ones would those have been? Our 360/50 used punched mylar cards. Any kind of disk that was available at the time would have been physically too large to fit in the frame :-) Regards

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Schuh, Richard
Which ones would those have been? Our 360/50 used punched mylar cards. Any kind of disk that was available at the time would have been physically too large to fit in the frame :-) Regards, Richard Schuh > Why not FBA? > > Oh, seems to me that some of the older high strength CPU's > used F

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread Edward M Martin
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of David L. Craig Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 10:42 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs! On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Richard Troth wrote: > > ECKD (today) is an I

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-09 Thread David L. Craig
On Sun, Mar 08, 2009 at 02:10:24PM -0400, Richard Troth wrote: > > ECKD (today) is an IBM hardware solution for a software problem. > Originally, CKD exposed not only counts and keys (thus the acronym) > but more significantly tracks and records. NO ONE but MVS (and TPF) > has a firm requirement

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-08 Thread Rich Smrcina
Richard Troth wrote: There ... and I said it all without using a certain 3-letter acronym. But it was very difficult wasn't it? I bow to your self control... :) -- Rich Smrcina VM Assist, Inc. Phone: 414-491-6001 Ans Service: 360-715-2467 http://www.linkedin.com/in/richsmrcina Catch the

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-08 Thread Richard Troth
Florian Bilek wrote: > Would be interesting to format an USB device in ECKD mode. Is this > possible ??? ;-) > > Probably that goes only together with an FICON attached USB-Reader > costing only 250.000$ allowing for ONE USB stick at a time. Great ;-) > > -- > Best regards > > Florian Bilek

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-07 Thread Florian Bilek
Would be interesting to format an USB device in ECKD mode. Is this possible ??? ;-) Probably that goes only together with an FICON attached USB-Reader costing only 250.000$ allowing for ONE USB stick at a time. Great ;-) -- Best regards Florian Bilek

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-06 Thread Edward M Martin
support) Ed Martin Aultman Health Foundation 330-588-4723 ext 40441 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Schuh, Richard Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 12:26 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe

Re: Must be Friday: Mainframe USBs!

2009-03-06 Thread Schuh, Richard
A 3390 formatted in 4K blocks is about 2.5G. Regards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Nick Laflamme > Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 9:08 AM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Must be Friday