x27;s without a helmet.
Must not think like a computer, cause they don't think either.
Dave Jones
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
11/11/2010 02:43 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SEQUENCE# ERRORS IN DIRECTORY
Hi, George.
DIRECTXA isn't complaining about sequence *numbers* being out of order
in the VMUVM DIRECT file, it's complaining that some of the directory
control statements for userid OPERATOR are not in the proper order. For
example, the LINK statement must follow any general statements
specified
PROGRAM - VERSION 5 RELEASE 4.0
EOJ DIRECTORY NOT UPDATED
Kris Buelens
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
11/11/2010 02:34 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SEQUENCE# ERRORS IN DIRECTORY
I don't think DIRECT
I don't think DIRECTXA is complaining about the sequence numbers one could
code beyond col 72.
I merely think it is that the AUTOLOG, ACCOUNT, MACHINE and OPTION records
follows a device record.
For a given user, firts code the non-device statements (like ACCOUNT), then
devices (line CONSOLE, SPOO
