> Sure, that's what most of us do for a subset of the syslog traffic.
> But the point I raised is that the driver of /dev/console does not
> write "lines" as such but a stream of bytes.
Unfortunately true. Syslog-ng is a little better behaved about that, but
not much.
> Let's share the
> war sto
On 2/27/07, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know it requires a (virtual) network connection, but have you
> considered to have syslog write the output 'remote' and catch that on
> VM ?
Syslog can also log to local files/devices, which doesn't require a
external network connection to w
Note: SET OBSERVER and SET SECUSER (i.e. SCIF) are mutually exclusive.
However: SET OBSERVER still "sees" linemode output when the primary user is
logged on; SET SECUSER only sees them when the primary user is
disconnected.
Kris Buelens,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
> I know it requires a (virtual) network connection, but have you
> considered to have syslog write the output 'remote' and catch that on
> VM ?
Syslog can also log to local files/devices, which doesn't require a
external network connection to work. If you have SCIF active, log to
/dev/console.
I can live with confusion.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:52 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON
On 2/27/07, Stracka, James (GTI) <[EM
On 2/27/07, Stracka, James (GTI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simply put: I want to know if turning it on will hurt anything.
If your VM:Operator is supposed to act on some console output, having
the time stamp there sometimes will make the match fail. Apart from
that, the worst is that someone
Simply put: I want to know if turning it on will hurt anything.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:53 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TERM TIMESTAMP ON
On 2/27/07
On 2/27/07, Stracka, James (GTI) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has anyone done this? Other than for someone who does a LOGON to the
VM console can you see any problem with this?
Most lines of what comes on the Linux console is not single lines
output, and so CP is limited in what can be done. L
Jim,
Can you clarify:
"We do have the SCIF to VM:Operator but that can be time consuming when
researching when messages are issued." for me?
When scanning the VM:Operator syslog, each message is prefixed by the time
it was issued (well... the time VM:Operator processed it, but that's
"pretty c
