Alan,
Great info.
Thanks.
Jim P.
On 8/19/10 9:04 AM, "Alan Altmark" wrote:
> On Thursday, 08/19/2010 at 03:52 EDT, Ronald van der Laan
> wrote:
>
>> I've not seen an answer to your question.
>> But you need to list all the first OSA addresses in the SET VSWITCH
> command.
>> so:
On Thursday, 08/19/2010 at 03:52 EDT, Ronald van der Laan
wrote:
> I've not seen an answer to your question.
> But you need to list all the first OSA addresses in the SET VSWITCH
command.
> so:
>SET VSWITCH name RDEV prim_osa C000 CONNECT
> If you use:
> SET VSWITCH name RDEV C000 CONNECT
Thanks Ron,
I tried the following which accomplished the objective of getting the
vswitch to recognize C000 as the backup:
SET VSWITCH name CONNECT
Thanks again
Jim P.
On 8/19/10 3:52 AM, "Ronald van der Laan" wrote:
> Jim,
>
> I've not seen an answer to your question.
> But you
Jim,
I've not seen an answer to your question.
But you need to list all the first OSA addresses in the SET VSWITCH command.
so:
SET VSWITCH name RDEV prim_osa C000 CONNECT
If you use:
SET VSWITCH name RDEV C000 CONNECT
Then you effectively drop your primary OSA connection and switch to your
b
Thank you, Marcy! I appreciate the quick response.
Regards,
Dave
On Mon, 2010-05-17 at 18:32 -0500, Marcy Cortes wrote:
> Will work, but would be nicer to it if you did a "set vswitch
> disconnect" first.
> You will lose all connectivity with no backup, but you know that ;)
>
>
>
> Marc
Will work, but would be nicer to it if you did a "set vswitch disconnect"
first.
You will lose all connectivity with no backup, but you know that ;)
Marcy
"This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this fo
rcina
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:08 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH question
Daniel Allen wrote:
> I created a VSWITCH at address 0110.
>
> I was able to get two (2) Linux machines and one (1) z/OS 1.4 system
> to use the VSWITCH.
>
> I created ano
--
> From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
> Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:08 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: VSWITCH question
>
> Daniel Allen wrote:
> > I created a VSWITCH at address 0110.
> >
No error message. The Linux machine is authorized to use the VSWITCH.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 4:08 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH question
Daniel Allen
Daniel Allen wrote:
I created a VSWITCH at address 0110.
I was able to get two (2) Linux machines and one (1) z/OS 1.4 system to
use the VSWITCH.
I created another VSWITCH at address 010C.
When I shutdown one of the two Linux machines and changed the directory
entry to use the second VSWI
On Tuesday, 05/20/2008 at 02:37 EDT, RPN01 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Someone commented that it was somewhat "clunky", but what we've been
doing
> for the grants is to add two COMMAND statements to each guest's CP
Directory
> entry (actually via an include); the first does the grant for the use
; From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Hodge, Robert L
> Sent: Fri 16-May-08 18:45
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Re: VSWITCH question
>
> XAUTOLOG the VSWITCH controller userids; typically DTCVSW1 and DTCVSW2.
>
> Add the the XAUTOLOG of DTCVSW1 and DTCVS
f you have one and are really
tight on security requirements.
Doug
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Hodge, Robert L
Sent: Fri 16-May-08 18:45
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VSWITCH question
XAUTOLOG the VSWITCH controller userids; typically D
XAUTOLOG the VSWITCH controller userids; typically DTCVSW1 and DTCVSW2.
Add the the XAUTOLOG of DTCVSW1 and DTCVSW2 to the PROFILE EXEC on the
A-disk on AUTOLOG1 or AUTOLOG2 for the next IPL of the z/VM system.
Add define and modify statements to the z/VM SYSTEM CONFIG for the next
time z/VM is
At 01:44 PM 8/29/2006, you wrote:
On Tuesday, 08/29/2006 at 01:21 AST, Mary Elwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As a newbie, I hope you'll take the opportunity to attend the System z9
and zSeries Expo in October in Orlando. Go to
http://www.vm.ibm.com/events and click on the link for the Expo.
There would need to be some layer 3 device with interfaces on both
networks, either a virtual machine acting as a router or an external
router for the systems on the different network segments to communicate.
VSWITCHes (and switches in general) are a layer 2 thing. Routers are
layer 3.
A suggesti
On Tuesday, 08/29/2006 at 01:21 AST, Mary Elwood
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We need to know if we can do what we need to do using vswitches. We run
> z/VM 5.1 with SUSE SLES9. We run on a z990 (2084). On the z990 we have
> three OSA?s. Two OSA?s will go to a vswitch for the 10.10.8 network
well, you could create a disconnected vswitch for the .5 network, or
just a guest lan. The disconnected vswitch (when you define the vswitch
don't code any RDEVs) has the advantage that virtual machine membership,
and vlan membership should you go that route, is RACF protected. I think
with thi
18 matches
Mail list logo
