Re: SFS problem

2011-04-20 Thread John Hall
] *On > Behalf Of *John Hall > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:04 AM > > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: SFS problem > > If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary > ID, aka "Alternate ID". (SECUSER is an old term)

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-20 Thread Schuh, Richard
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of John Hall Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:04 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary ID, aka "Alterna

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-20 Thread Mike Walter
;The IBM z/VM Operating System" 04/20/2011 09:17 AM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: SFS problem I do not believe that this is the problem. I was giving you information on the failing job that I am most familiar

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-20 Thread Hughes, Jim
Behalf Of Graves Nora E Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:17 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem I do not believe that this is the problem. I was giving you information on the failing job that I am most familiar with. Other jobs that fail are submitted to VMBatch by the ID

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-20 Thread Graves Nora E
/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of John Hall Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:04 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary ID, aka "Alternate ID". (SECUSER is an old term). D

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-20 Thread John Hall
ECUSER? > > > Regards, > Richard Schuh > > > > > -- > *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On > Behalf Of *John Hall > *Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2011 6:41 AM > > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UA

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Ethan Lanz
* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On > Behalf Of *Kris Buelens > *Sent:* Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:58 PM > > *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > *Subject:* Re: SFS problem > > Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the > auth

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Schuh, Richard
Isn't that DIAG 88, instead of SECUSER? Regards, Richard Schuh From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of John Hall Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 6:41 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread John Hall
Nora, Batch jobs normally run with the privileges of the "owner" of the job, using the SECUSER facility in z/VM. With SFS, this can lead to unexpected results when a prior batch job leaves the worker with a connection to the filepool under a different user's id. If the job ordering/selection of b

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Graves Nora E
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Hughes, Jim Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:23 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem Nora, Have you looked at the SFS service machine's console log for any odd messages? Could the SFS server being

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Quay, Jonathan (IHG)
Mgmt chose the latter. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Graves Nora E Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:43 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem Mike, Yes, I checked out the message. The thing is, th

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Graves Nora E
23 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem Nora, Have you looked at the SFS service machine's console log for any odd messages? Could the SFS server being doing some sort of control backup? Jim Hughes Consulting Systems Programmer Mainframe Technical Support

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Graves Nora E
Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Kris Buelens Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:58 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the authority of the job submitter. You say "This user i

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Graves Nora E
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem On Thursday, 04/14/2011 at 03:47 EDT, Graves Nora E wrote: > DMSOPN1258E You are not authorized to write to file XX 20110413 Z1 : > I've issued QUERY ACCESSED. The directory shows that is accessed R/W. > > When the

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-19 Thread Graves Nora E
il 14, 2011 4:13 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: SFS problem Nora, Did you issue: HELP DMSOPN1258E The response from the msg indicates an SFS authorization problem.: -- (c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2008 DMS1258E to write (to) file Explanation

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-14 Thread Hughes, Jim
Nora, Have you looked at the SFS service machine's console log for any odd messages? Could the SFS server being doing some sort of control backup? Jim Hughes Consulting Systems Programmer Mainframe Technical Support Group Department of Information Technology State of New Ham

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-14 Thread Kris Buelens
Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the authority of the job submitter. You say "This user is the owner of most of the directories" You mean: the submitter is userid ABC, the dirids are all named "fpoolid:ABC.something"? 2011/4/14 Graves Nora E > We are having an

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-14 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 04/14/2011 at 03:47 EDT, Graves Nora E wrote: > DMSOPN1258E You are not authorized to write to file XX 20110413 Z1 : > I've issued QUERY ACCESSED. The directory shows that is accessed R/W. > > When the write is unsuccessful, the program then loops through 5 tries of >

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-14 Thread Mike Walter
PM Please respond to "The IBM z/VM Operating System" To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject SFS problem We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone may have some ideas of what to pursue next. We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH ov

Re: SFS problem

2011-04-14 Thread Peter . Webb
:46 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: SFS problem We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone may have some ideas of what to pursue next. We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH overnight. Sometimes they are not able to create a file in a directory,

SFS problem

2011-04-14 Thread Graves Nora E
We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone may have some ideas of what to pursue next. We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH overnight. Sometimes they are not able to create a file in a directory, even though most times it is successful. The only differenc