] *On
> Behalf Of *John Hall
> *Sent:* Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:04 AM
>
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: SFS problem
>
> If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary
> ID, aka "Alternate ID". (SECUSER is an old term)
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Hall
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:04 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary ID,
aka "Alterna
;The IBM z/VM Operating System"
04/20/2011 09:17 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SFS problem
I do not believe that this is the problem. I was giving you information on
the failing job that I am most familiar
Behalf Of Graves Nora E
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:17 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
I do not believe that this is the problem. I was giving you information
on the failing job that I am most familiar with. Other jobs that fail
are submitted to VMBatch by the ID
/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of John Hall
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 10:04 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
If I recall correctly, DIAG D4 is the one that manipulates the secondary
ID, aka "Alternate ID". (SECUSER is an old term). D
ECUSER?
>
>
> Regards,
> Richard Schuh
>
>
>
>
> --
> *From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On
> Behalf Of *John Hall
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 19, 2011 6:41 AM
>
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UA
* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] *On
> Behalf Of *Kris Buelens
> *Sent:* Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:58 PM
>
> *To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> *Subject:* Re: SFS problem
>
> Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the
> auth
Isn't that DIAG 88, instead of SECUSER?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Hall
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 6:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Nora,
Batch jobs normally run with the privileges of the "owner" of the job, using
the SECUSER facility in z/VM. With SFS, this can lead to unexpected results
when a prior batch job leaves the worker with a connection to the filepool
under a different user's id. If the job ordering/selection of b
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Hughes, Jim
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 5:23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Nora,
Have you looked at the SFS service machine's console log for any odd
messages?
Could the SFS server being
Mgmt chose the latter.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Graves Nora E
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2011 7:43 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Mike,
Yes, I checked out the message. The thing is, th
23 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Nora,
Have you looked at the SFS service machine's console log for any odd
messages?
Could the SFS server being doing some sort of control backup?
Jim Hughes
Consulting Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support
Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Kris Buelens
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 4:58 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the
authority of the job submitter.
You say "This user i
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
On Thursday, 04/14/2011 at 03:47 EDT, Graves Nora E
wrote:
> DMSOPN1258E You are not authorized to write to file XX 20110413
Z1
:
> I've issued QUERY ACCESSED. The directory shows that is accessed
R/W.
>
> When the
il 14, 2011 4:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: SFS problem
Nora,
Did you issue: HELP DMSOPN1258E
The response from the msg indicates an SFS authorization problem.:
--
(c) Copyright IBM Corporation 1990, 2008
DMS1258E to
write
(to)
file
Explanation
Nora,
Have you looked at the SFS service machine's console log for any odd
messages?
Could the SFS server being doing some sort of control backup?
Jim Hughes
Consulting Systems Programmer
Mainframe Technical Support Group
Department of Information Technology
State of New Ham
Note: if you use VMBATCH, the worker machine connects to SFS with the
authority of the job submitter.
You say "This user is the owner of most of the directories" You mean: the
submitter is userid ABC, the dirids are all named "fpoolid:ABC.something"?
2011/4/14 Graves Nora E
> We are having an
On Thursday, 04/14/2011 at 03:47 EDT, Graves Nora E
wrote:
> DMSOPN1258E You are not authorized to write to file XX 20110413 Z1
:
> I've issued QUERY ACCESSED. The directory shows that is accessed R/W.
>
> When the write is unsuccessful, the program then loops through 5 tries
of
>
PM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
SFS problem
We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone may
have some ideas of what to pursue next.
We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH ov
:46
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: SFS problem
We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone
may have some ideas of what to pursue next.
We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH overnight. Sometimes
they are not able to create a file in a directory,
We are having an intermittent problem with SFS and I'm hoping someone
may have some ideas of what to pursue next.
We have several batch jobs that run under VMBATCH overnight. Sometimes
they are not able to create a file in a directory, even though most
times it is successful. The only differenc
21 matches
Mail list logo