I used D4B3290 and it seems to be working. More testing...
Thanks to all,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: October 30, 2008 12:43 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and VTAM definition
On Thursday, 10/30/2008 at 12:31 EDT, "Horlick, Michael"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah, they get a Model 5 if not dialled. It looks like you're right
> about the logmode. I'm a little rusty on VTAM. Need to investigate what
> to use.
Use D4B3290. A snippet from my non-SNA USSTAB:
UNDIAL U
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Horlick, Michael
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2008 12:32 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and VTAM definition
Yeah, they get a Model 5 if not dialled. It looks like you're right
about the logmode. I'm a little rusty on VTAM. Need to investigate w
October 30, 2008 12:21 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TCP/IP and VTAM definition
On Thursday, 10/30/2008 at 12:06 EDT, "Horlick, Michael"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having problems with getting the terminal definitions passed
through. For
> example, if
On Thursday, 10/30/2008 at 12:06 EDT, "Horlick, Michael"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am having problems with getting the terminal definitions passed
through. For
> example, if I create a 3278 Model 5 terminal with my emulator and
connect to
> the VM TCP/IP stack I may get dialed in to VTAM
Greetings,
We are starting to migrate a lot of our users from SNA to TCP/IP.
I have the SCEXIT EXEC set up to do a DIAL into VTAM in order to access
our CA-TPX session manager.
I am having problems with getting the terminal definitions passed
through. For example, if I create a 3278 Mo
