http://www.vm.ibm.com/storman/pav/pav2.html#2006 , I finally found a
writeup on the topic , at least up to date as of Z/VM 5.2.
We haven't isolated the dasd by CU (yet). I'm interested in what the
potential for falure is. So far with the MOD-3's we've had no ill side
affects. I imagine the risk would be greater with MOD-9's but I've not
found any written doc on this issue, as if no one would consider doing
it?
e-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of David Yeager
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:36 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Z/VM EMC Dasd Dynamic PAV's shared IODF
We have one CEC. We have four z/os lpars in a single sysplex and 2 Z/VM lpars
We have one CEC. We have four z/os lpars in a single sysplex and 2 Z/VM
lpars and one IODF. A few years ago we went to mod9's and mod27's with
dynamic paving on the Z/OS controlled by WLM. For the VM dasd we
uniquely clip as LX, and can see it from the Z/OS side. Up until
now we'