Re: bandwidth of a swallow (was: Real core)

2006-10-12 Thread Anne & Lynn Wheeler
Paul B. Nieman wrote: > In the early 1990's we consolidated a data center from Sydney into > Philadelphia. We used SYBACK to do a full dump of specific (most) > minidisks to tape and shipped the tapes. We then performed daily > incrementals to disk, and sent the incrementals via RSCS, via a 9600

Re: bandwidth of a swallow (was: Real core)

2006-10-11 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Wouldn't it take a hour to send 3.5 MB at 9600 baud? On the surface it would seem that your site didn't modify much in any one day. But then, most of us may be supprised by how little is actually updated. Back in the '70s there was an PNET/RJE function called RTPSEND and RTPRECV in which you cou

Re: bandwidth of a swallow (was: Real core)

2006-10-11 Thread Paul B. Nieman
In the early 1990's we consolidated a data center from Sydney into Philadelphia. We used SYBACK to do a full dump of specific (most) minidisks to tape and shipped the tapes. We then performed daily incrementals to disk, and sent the incrementals via RSCS, via a 9600 baud line at most. I thin

Re: bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core]

2006-10-11 Thread Stricklin, Raymond J
of the MIT TX-0 MIDAS assembler.   http://www.typewritten.org/Articles/Saunders-20030405.html     ok r. From: Richard Troth [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2006 7:07 AMTo: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core] Sir Dave the Generous spake

Re: bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core]

2006-10-10 Thread Richard Troth
se respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System From Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core] Well, yea, I suppose if you could get *two* swallows to cooperate, they could carry a 3592 tape cartridge between th

Re: bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core]

2006-10-10 Thread Dave Jones
Well, yea, I suppose if you could get *two* swallows to cooperate, they could carry a 3592 tape cartridge between them. Even a 3592 cartridge fully laden with 300 GB of data weighs less than a coconut, but I still say the air speed of two such swallows would be somewhat less than, say, a 747...

bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core]

2006-10-10 Thread Steve Gentry
    cc:                 Subject:        bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core] Sir Dave the Generous spake: > You don't seriously expect us to believe that a swallow > (African or any other kind...) can grasp a 3592 tape cartridge, > do you? They have no husks, as you know

bandwidth of a swallow [was: Real core]

2006-10-10 Thread Richard Troth
Sir Dave the Generous spake: > You don't seriously expect us to believe that a swallow > (African or any other kind...) can grasp a 3592 tape cartridge, > do you? They have no husks, as you know..;-) Perhaps he's suggesting that cores migrate?  (cat herders ... they've seen it all,  you kno