> I didn't think you guys were still maintaining it for the older
> systems (z/VM 4.4 on MP3K).
We sure are. We just aren't doing one for the new systems that no longer use
the Linux-based SSL (because, well, they don't use it).
It still can't fix the basic scalabilit
David,
I didn't think you guys were still maintaining it for the older
systems (z/VM 4.4 on MP3K).
Rod
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 12:04 PM, David Boyes wrote:
> What version of the guest? We have maintained it over time, so if you've got
> an old one, you may want to upgrade.
> -- db
>
> We have a z/VM 4.4 system which was setup to use Sine Nomine's Linux
> guest to provide SSL tn3270 support.
>
> It has broken, and I would just like to remove the feature so that
> z/VM TCP/IP would just use regular tn3270.
What version of the guest? We have maintained
We have a z/VM 4.4 system which was setup to use Sine Nomine's Linux
guest to provide SSL tn3270 support.
It has broken, and I would just like to remove the feature so that
z/VM TCP/IP would just use regular tn3270.
We have gone to using BigIP to offload that stuff on other systems a
On Friday, 09/03/2010 at 12:55 EDT, "Wandschneider, Scott"
wrote:
> Does anybody know or know where I could find out if z/VM 4.4 running
native on
> a 2066-0A2 CEC will support DASD controller model 2105 and/or 2107?
The CEC doesn't care, but z/VM does and the answer
tested it during
initial installation).
z/vm 4.4 is running ate rsu level 0601 (lastest for this version).
I hope this help you.
Carlos Bodra
IBM zSeries Certified Specialist
Sao Paulo - Brazil
Em 03/09/2010 13:55, Wandschneider, Scott escreveu:
Does anybody know or know where I could
Does anybody know or know where I could find out if z/VM 4.4 running native on
a 2066-0A2 CEC will support DASD controller model 2105 and/or 2107?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer|| Infocrossing, a Wipro Company || 11707 Miracle
Hills Drive, Omaha, NE, 68154-4457
Carlos,
Vm needs to be at least 5.2 and vse 4.2. Your setup will not run.
Sent from my blackberry
- Original Message -
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Mon May 17 17:02:59 2010
Subject: z/vm 4.4 and vse 2.3.1 running in a z10 BC
Hello
We have a
I can't say anything about VSE, but z/VM 4.4 is not a supported release
of VM on the z10 series.
On 05/17/2010 04:02 PM, Carlos Bodra wrote:
Hello
We have a chance to migrate our hardware from MP3000 H50 running vse/esa
2.3.1 under z/vm 4.4.0 to a new z10 BC machine.
Since we have a l
e
> H50 by z10 BC and up systems again? Of course,
> I will ask to CA a new LMP Key for new serial of BC machine. Will z/vm 4.4
> and vse 2.3.1 runs error free (as today under H50) on
> z10 BC?
>
> Thanks a lot for comments
>
> Carlos Bodra
>
, but, this will demand a greater
effort.
My questions is simple, can I just shutdown systems, (vm and vse)
replace H50 by z10 BC and up systems again? Of course,
I will ask to CA a new LMP Key for new serial of BC machine. Will z/vm
4.4 and vse 2.3.1 runs error free (as today under H50) on
z10
Yes, I does work under z/VM 4.4.
I installed z/OS 1.7 as a guest machine, and later I promoted i to an LPAR.
For a z/800, these are the main issues:
1) z/OS 1.7 will not be able to use ZAAP processor because z/800 does
not support them.
This is a hardware limitation.
2) z/OS 1.7 comes
OH 43215-2220 U.S.A
Voice: (614) 249-5213Fax: (614) 249-3912
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on 03/19/2008
11:19:41 AM:
> IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>
> Does anybody have any experience or can anybody verify that z/OS 1.7
> will run under a z/VM 4.4 s
, March 19, 2008 8:20 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: z/OS 1.7 on a z/800 Under z/VM 4.4
Does anybody have any experience or can anybody verify that z/OS 1.7
will run under a z/VM 4.4 system on a z/800?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer
Infocrossing
Office
Does anybody have any experience or can anybody verify that z/OS 1.7
will run under a z/VM 4.4 system on a z/800?
Thank you,
Scott R Wandschneider
Senior Systems Programmer
Infocrossing
Office 402.963.8905
Don Russell wrote:
I'm still unable to get to the www.vm.ibm.com web site and need some
information of features/enhancements etc offered by z/VM 5.2 over 4.4.
Thank you for the replies, both here and off-list.
Cheers,
Don
z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: z/VM 4.4--> 5.2
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr_OS390/Shelves/hcsh2a80
The above is the manuals for z/VM 5.2. Including are Introduction
guide and the Release guide.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulti
tion, it seems to start from 4.4
2007/1/12, Don Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> I'm still unable to get to the www.vm.ibm.com web site and need some
> information of features/enhancements etc offered by z/VM 5.2 over
4.4.
>
> We're currently using z/VM 4.4 (32 bit) a
I'll send you a 5.2 PDF presentation, it seems to start from 4.4
2007/1/12, Don Russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I'm still unable to get to the www.vm.ibm.com web site and need some
information of features/enhancements etc offered by z/VM 5.2 over 4.4.
We're currently using
I'm still unable to get to the www.vm.ibm.com web site and need some
information of features/enhancements etc offered by z/VM 5.2 over 4.4.
We're currently using z/VM 4.4 (32 bit) and I've been asked to gather
some information on the benefits of 5.2.
Could somebody plea
There is a CYL0_BLK0_CLEANUP setting, and if you set it to YES, it will
scratch mdisks that start at cyl 0 too.
Or if you have, like we once suffered from, an admin guy who found it more
secure to use the option CLEAN on the PURGE or DMDISK commands, overriding
the default dirmaint settings, well
Wasn't DIRMAINT 1.5 changed as not to clean minidisks that start at
cylinder 0?
Kris,
IBM Belgium, VM customer support
The IBM z/VM Operating System wrote on
2006-12-14 16:23:35:
> Did you bay any chance use DIRMAINT to delete a minidisk that covered
> cylinder zero of volume 230RES? When DI
Did you bay any chance use DIRMAINT to delete a minidisk that covered
cylinder zero of volume 230RES? When DIRMAINT deletes a minidisk, it usua
lly
has its worker DATAMOVE format the minidisk before deallocating it to
prevent the next user from getting data from it.
/Tom Kern
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006
Any chance that a minidisk covering cyl 0 was defined, them deleted?
Mary Zervos wrote:
Thanks to everyone for their help on Sysprof. I used Mike's
suggestion below and it worked like a charm. The new z/vm 4.4 system
dust is starting to settle.
Anyone game for another que
Thanks to everyone for their help on Sysprof. I used Mike's suggestion
below and it worked like a charm. The new z/vm 4.4 system dust is
starting to settle.
Anyone game for another question...
Yesterday on our new 4.4 system, I was deleting some old users on random
packs using Dir
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Sysprof Exec in z/vm 4.4
Well, we finally migrated to z/vm 4.4 two days ago from vm/esa 2.3.
Most of our little fires are out. But here's a new problem for
us..we tailor our Sysprof Exec to run
> Well, we finally migrated to z/vm 4.4 two days ago from vm/esa 2.3.
> Most of our little fires are out. But here's a new problem for
> us..we tailor our Sysprof Exec to run an "account exec" before a
> users's profile exec. For some reason, Sysprof exec is
do not necessarily
represent the opinions or policies of Hewitt Associates.
"Mary Zervos" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "The IBM z/VM Operating System"
12/13/2006 10:28 AM
Please respond to
"The IBM z/VM Operating System"
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
You have to reload the INSTSEG DCSS
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mary Zervos
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 11:29 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Sysprof Exec in z/vm 4.4
Well, we finally migrated to z/vm 4.4
Well, we finally migrated to z/vm 4.4 two days ago from vm/esa 2.3.
Most of our little fires are out. But here's a new problem for
us..we tailor our Sysprof Exec to run an "account exec" before a
users's profile exec. For some reason, Sysprof exec is not being run
wh
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 8:45 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] z/vm 4.4
On Wednesday, 12/06/2006 at 10:29 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Disregard previous 'comment'. I was incorrect, we are z/OS 1.4. (I
> do
ill seek with google whats about Diag, and thanks all the explain for you
and for others :)
On 12/6/06, David Boyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The CPUID can be parsed this way:
> [snip]
> So there is some relatively interesting information in the CPUID.
And if you're really interested, read
Behalf Of Mary Zervos
> Sent: Wednesday, December 06, 2006 10:51 AM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: z/vm 4.4
>
> Okay..a step further...will OS/390 2.10 run under z/vm 4.4 on
a
> Z9?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> Mary Zervos
> VM Systems Programmer
> Binghamton University
ide the
machine characteristics from MVS.
/ahw
>
>
>
>
>Mary Zervos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System
>12/06/2006 11:10 AM
>Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System
>
>
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
>cc:
>
On Wednesday, 12/06/2006 at 10:29 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Disregard previous 'comment'. I was incorrect, we are z/OS 1.4. (I dont
> get on that part of the machine much)
Further, z/VM doesn't protect a guest from the ... nuances ... of the
processor. It is capable of hiding some of the
V.UARK.EDU
cc:
Subject:Re: z/vm 4.4
We were told that OS/390 2.10 does not run on a z9 but we think the
person might not have realized we were talking about it running under
z/VM 4.4.
Dave Jones wrote:
> I believe that if OS/390 2.10 will run natively on a z9 (I don'
Topic
ARK.EDU>
Subject
Re: z/vm 4.4
We recently upgraded to a Z9 while still running OS/390 2.10. Required
some maint. but its running great!
Steve Mitchell
Sr Systems Software Specialist
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas
(785) 291-8885
'There are no degrees of Honesty-you're either Honest or you're not!
We were told that OS/390 2.10 does not run on a z9 but we think the
person might not have realized we were talking about it running under
z/VM 4.4.
Dave Jones wrote:
I believe that if OS/390 2.10 will run natively on a z9 (I don't know
the answer to that one...), it will run as a guest
I believe that if OS/390 2.10 will run natively on a z9 (I don't know
the answer to that one...), it will run as a guest under z/VM 4.4 on a
z9. Is OS/390 2.10 64-bit capable?
DJ
Mary Zervos wrote:
Okay..a step further...will OS/390 2.10 run under z/vm 4.4 on a Z9?
Thanks
Okay..a step further...will OS/390 2.10 run under z/vm 4.4 on a
Z9?
Thanks again,
Mary Zervos
VM Systems Programmer
Binghamton University
> The CPUID can be parsed this way:
> [snip]
> So there is some relatively interesting information in the CPUID.
And if you're really interested, read the documentation on the response
to DIAG 0. That tells you all kinds of neat stuff.
-- db
Alan Altmark wrote:
2064 - z900
2066 - z800
2084 - z990
2086 - z890
2094 - z9 EC
2096 - z9 BC
A pattern emerges. ;-)
Aha! So this little, rack-mounted 2074 we have in the lab must have some
additional capabilities I had never suspected before! I'll go and check
it out right now...
On Wednesday, 12/06/2006 at 09:09 EST, Mark Pace <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 2096 - 2094
> The difference being a BC or EC class z9.
2064 - z900
2066 - z800
2084 - z990
2086 - z890
2094 - z9 EC
2096 - z9 BC
A pattern emerges. ;-)
Alan Altmark
z/VM Development
IBM Endicott
On 6 Dec 2006 at 8:07, Dave Jones wrote:
> 8000 < machine check extended logout length
Take a look at:
http://listserv.uark.edu/scripts/wa.exe?A2=ind0404&L=vmesa-l&T=0&P=9555
Here is an excerpt:
> I think it is time to update our documentation. :-) QUERY CPUID gives
> you the result o
.01 08:42:12
>> q cpuid
>> CPUID = FF04858C20948000
>> otsmuns; T=0.01/0.01 08:42:17
>>
>> Bill Munson
>> IT Specialist
>> Office of Information Technology
>> State of New Jersey
>> (609) 984-4065
>>
>> President MVMUA
>> h
2096 - 2094
The difference being a BC or EC class z9.
--
Mark Pace
Mainline Information Systems
.marist.edu/~mvmua
Mary Zervos wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I need a really quick answer.will z/vm 4.4 run on a Z9? We're
> currently running z/vm 4.4 on an MP3000.
>
> Thanks everyone,
>
> Mary Zervos
> VM Systems Programmer
> Binghamton University
ll Munson
> IT Specialist
> Office of Information Technology
> State of New Jersey
> (609) 984-4065
>
> President MVMUA
> http://www.marist.edu/~mvmua
>
>
>
> Mary Zervos wrote:
> > Hello everyone,
> >
> > I nee
I need a really quick answer.will z/vm 4.4 run on a Z9?
We're
> currently running z/vm 4.4 on an MP3000.
>
> Thanks everyone,
>
> Mary Zervos
> VM Systems Programmer
> Binghamton University
a really quick answer.........will z/vm 4.4 run on a Z9? We're
> currently running z/vm 4.4 on an MP3000.
>
> Thanks everyone,
>
> Mary Zervos
> VM Systems Programmer
> Binghamton University
Technology
State of New Jersey
(609) 984-4065
President MVMUA
http://www.marist.edu/~mvmua
Mary Zervos wrote:
Hello everyone,
I need a really quick answer.will z/vm 4.4 run on a Z9? We're
currently running z/vm 4.4 on an MP3000.
Thanks everyone,
Mary Zervos
VM Systems Progr
System
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
ARK.EDU>
Hello everyone,
I need a really quick answer.will z/vm 4.4 run on a Z9? We're
currently running z/vm 4.4 on an MP3000.
Thanks everyone,
Mary Zervos
VM Systems Programmer
Binghamton University
t have an IFL. Can the general
> processor be shared between these 2 LPARs with the TECH LPAR marked as
> Linux only? What would happen if I changed the TECH LPAR from Linux only
> to ESA/390? Would that mean I would have to some changes to the Z/VM 4.4
> or would it IPL ok with no changes?
So we got a free IFL from IBM. I do know you can't change the IFL on a
MP3000-H30 or any MP3000 for that matter to a standard processor. But if
I change the LPAR from Linux only to ESA/390, I should be able to run
the Z/VM 4.4 and run Linux under z/VM4.4 for the time being. But
ultimately I
"Linux only" is an IFL. Integrated Facility for Linux.
I don't know if you can change an IFL to a standard processor. Some of the
newer machines I believe you can, mp3000, I don't know.
The VM will IPL fine on either a standard CPU or and IFL. But you can only
run VM and/or Linux on an IFL. N
What would happen if I changed the TECH LPAR from Linux only
to ESA/390? Would that mean I would have to some changes to the Z/VM 4.4
or would it IPL ok with no changes?
Jim Dodds
Systems Programmer
Kentucky State University
400 East Main Street
Frankfort, Ky 40601
502 597 6114
-Original Me
You can define as many LPARs as your machine type allows. Each LPAR will
have (one or more) standard CPUs or (one or more) IFL CPUs assigned to
it but not both. A CPU can be assigned to more than one LPAR. If you
wish to use both standard and IFL CPUs you must have at least 2 LPARs
defined.
I
Just a little off.
Your old understanding is still correct. But now if you have an IFL, it
must be in a LPAR(s) with only other IFLs. You can not mix standard CPUs
and IFLs in the same LPAR.
Mark D Pace
Senior Systems Engineer
Mainline Information Systems
1700 Summit Lake Drive
Tallahassee, FL
ystem'
Subject: Z/VM 4.4 system question
I hope that this list may assist or point me in the right
direction for this problem.
I have inherited an incomplete project from a coworker that
is longer with the school. Currently we have a Z/VM 4.4 system in a separate
LPAR called TECH, that was
2 597 6114
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006 2:12 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Z/VM 4.4 system question
On Monday, 10/02/2006 at 01:59 AST, "Dodds, Jim" &l
, Ky 40601
502 597 6114
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Monday, October 02, 2006
2:05 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Z/VM 4.4 system
question
I am not familar with an MP3000. However,
that symptom will
On Monday, 10/02/2006 at 01:04 EST, "McKown, John"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not familar with an MP3000. However, that symptom will occur on a
> zSeries machine if you attempt to IPL z/VSE (or z/OS) on an IFL engine
and not
> a standard engine. Is it possible that the TECH LPAR is de
On Monday, 10/02/2006 at 01:59 AST, "Dodds, Jim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have inherited an incomplete project from a coworker that is longer
with the
> school. Currently we have a Z/VM 4.4 system in a separate LPAR called
TECH,
> that was to be used to conve
prohibited.
-Original Message-From: The IBM z/VM
Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dodds,
JimSent: Monday, October 02, 2006 12:59 PMTo:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDUSubject: Z/VM 4.4 system
question
I hope that this list may assist
or point me in
I hope that this list may assist or point me in the right
direction for this problem.
I have inherited an incomplete project from a coworker that
is longer with the school. Currently we have a Z/VM 4.4 system in a separate LPAR
called TECH, that was to be used to convert an set of
Sigh.
Peter
Austin, Alyce (CIV) wrote:
Hi Alan,
I assume this means support for z/VM 4.4 running on a z800
platform will not be supported after 30 September too?
Thanks,
Alyce
IBM would probably want to know why you haven't migrated to z/VM Version
5 yet; it should be no more expensive than
On Thursday, 06/22/2006 at 02:42 MST, "Austin, Alyce (CIV)"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I assume this means support for z/VM 4.4 running on a z800
> platform will not be supported after 30 September too?
Hi, Alyce. Right. All support for z/VM 4.4 will be dropped unless
Hi Alan,
I assume this means support for z/VM 4.4 running on a z800
platform will not be supported after 30 September too?
Thanks,
Alyce
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 2:24 PM
To
The King is dead! Long live the King!
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Altmark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2006 4:24 PM
> To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
> Subject: Alert: Upcoming end-of-service for z/VM 4.4
>
> Back in April there was dis
Back in April there was discussion about the end-of-service date for z/VM
4.4. Based on feedback here and in other venues, we re-examined that
decision to see if a business case existed that would allow us to continue
service. While there were some reasons to extend z/VM 4.4 service, the
73 matches
Mail list logo
