t over that and move on...
Thanks - Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 11:52 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>
&g
Hi, Fred (et al.),
On 3/29/2017 3:06 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
> One other comment. I agree with figures 12 and 13 but (and I think this is
> a crucial point) I think they need a supporting sentence or two explaining
> why the procedure is "fragment then encapsulate" and not "encapsulate
> then fragme
Hi, Fred,
Circling back to this item:
On 3/29/2017 2:18 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> One other comment. I agree with figures 12 and 13 but (and I think this is
> a crucial point) I think they need a supporting sentence or two explaining
> why the procedure is "fragment then encapsulate" and not
f.org
>> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>>
>> HI Fred,
>>
>> I'm in the process of the next update, and wanted to clarify the following:
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/2017 9:36 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>>> 18) Secti
, Fred L
>> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>>
>> Fred,
>>
>> Regarding the following point:
>>
>>
>> On 3/28/2017 9:36 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
>>> 19) Section 4.3.3, th
Joe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:17 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>
> Fred,
>
> Regarding the fo
Interesting timing on this message, but see below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 4:13 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-0
Fred,
Regarding the following point:
On 3/28/2017 9:36 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> 19) Section 4.3.3, third paragraph, I thought it was said earlier
> that all ingress/egress pairs must support the same MTU. I
> thought we agreed earlier on that that multi-MTU subnets
> don't work.
HI Fred,
I'm in the process of the next update, and wanted to clarify the following:
On 3/28/2017 9:36 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> 18) Section 4.3.3, For Multipoint Tunnels, please cite AERO, as
> well as ISATAP [RFC5214] and 6over4 [RFC2529]. They define
> an NBMA multipoint tunnel fra
Hi Joe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 3:04 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>
> Winding down to the last
Winding down to the last part:
(I agree that encryption or mimicry is useful only when it works, but
not much more can be said than that)
On 5/3/2017 2:59 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> The problem is that if there are N paths in the multipath the ingress has
> no way of knowing that it has probed
Hi Joe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 2:38 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>
> Winnowing down... I think we&#x
Winnowing down... I think we're converging. Let me know if not...
Joe
On 5/3/2017 2:24 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> ...
> I thought for multipoint tunnels all egress' had to have the same reassembly
> MTU? Or, if taking the minimum, that minimum value could be conveyed in
> the MTU option in a R
Hi Joe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 1:38 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>
> HI, Fred,
>
> On 5/3
HI, Fred,
On 5/3/2017 1:07 PM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 11:47 AM
>> To: Templin, Fred L
>> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [Int-area]
Hi Joe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 03, 2017 11:47 AM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>
> Hi, Fred,
>
> Your r
, Fred L wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> Sorry for the extended delay - see below for responses:
>
> Thanks - Fred
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 3:06 PM
>> To: Templin, Fred L
>> Cc:
Hi Joe,
Sorry for the extended delay - see below for responses:
Thanks - Fred
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 3:06 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action:
Hi, Fred,
I think we're agreed except for PMTUD and PLMTUD. See below about the
latter (AFAICT, if it black holes, then the PLMTUD would detect a
failure to make forward progress). Black-holing in PMTUD is known and
not something this (or any other doc) is fixing, but also a known standard.
Joe
Hi Joe,
See below:
> -Original Message-
> From: Joe Touch [mailto:to...@isi.edu]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2017 12:38 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L
> Cc: int-area@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [Int-area] I-D Action: draft-ietf-intarea-tunnels-05.txt
>
> Hi, Fred,
>
Hi, Fred,
Thanks for the feedback. Let's assume I incorporate the nits/bugs and I
address any clarifications when I get to them in detail, so I'll jump
only to the deeper issues below...
Joe
On 3/28/2017 9:36 AM, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Here are my comments for this draft. Mostly editorial, bu
like this
includes multiple packets that, if transmitted individually,
would take different paths within the tunnel. Also, in the
figure the insertion of the block labeled "iHa | iDa" should
show up as "iHa | iDa" within the packed packet (it currently
shows up
Hi, all,
This update catches some typos that are important for understanding the
terminology changes.
Joe
On 3/27/2017 8:34 AM, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> This draft is a work item of the Internet Area W
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Internet Area Working Group of the IETF.
Title : IP Tunnels in the Internet Architecture
Authors : Joe Touch
Mark Townsley
24 matches
Mail list logo
