On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:54:00PM +0200, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:41:50AM +0200, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
> >> + /* GMBUS NAK handling seems to be unstable, hence let the
> >> + * transmitter detection run i
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:41:50AM +0200, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
>> +/* GMBUS NAK handling seems to be unstable, hence let the
>> + * transmitter detection run in bit banging mode for now.
>> + */
>> +intel_gmbus_forc
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:41:50AM +0200, "David Müller (ELSOFT AG)" wrote:
> Hello
>
> As discussed in this thread
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-April/037411.html
> GMBUS based DVO transmitter detection seems to be unreliable which could
> result in an unusable DVO port.
Hello
As discussed in this thread
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2013-April/037411.html
GMBUS based DVO transmitter detection seems to be unreliable which could
result in an unusable DVO port.
The attached patch fixes this by falling back to bit banging mode for
the time DVO tran