On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 11:20:07PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 02:17:18PM -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:36:05PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä
> > >
> > > The enabled_planes bitmask was supposed to track logically enab
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 02:17:18PM -0700, Navare, Manasi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:36:05PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > From: Ville Syrjälä
> >
> > The enabled_planes bitmask was supposed to track logically enabled
> > planes (ie. fb!=NULL and crtc!=NULL), but instead we end up putti
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 05:36:05PM +0200, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> The enabled_planes bitmask was supposed to track logically enabled
> planes (ie. fb!=NULL and crtc!=NULL), but instead we end up putting
> even disabled planes into the bitmask since
> intel_plane_atomic_chec
From: Ville Syrjälä
The enabled_planes bitmask was supposed to track logically enabled
planes (ie. fb!=NULL and crtc!=NULL), but instead we end up putting
even disabled planes into the bitmask since
intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state() only takes the early exit
if the plane was disabled and stay
