Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: Fix flow rule delete failure due to invalid validation

2026-01-16 Thread Paul Menzel

[Cc: Remove Ahmed as address bounces]

Am 16.01.26 um 18:39 schrieb Paul Menzel:


Dear Sreedevi,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 13.01.26 um 19:01 schrieb Sreedevi Joshi:

When deleting a flow rule using "ethtool -N  delete ",
idpf_sideband_action_ena() incorrectly validates fsp->ring_cookie even
though ethtool doesn't populate this field for delete operations. The
uninitialized ring_cookie may randomly match RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC or
RX_CLS_FLOW_WAKE, causing validation to fail and preventing legitimate
rule deletions. Remove the unnecessary sideband action enable check and
ring_cookie validation during delete operations since action validation
is not required when removing existing rules.

Fixes: ada3e24b84a0 ("idpf: add flow steering support")
Signed-off-by: Sreedevi Joshi 
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov 
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c | 3 ---
  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c b/drivers/ 
net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c

index 2efa3c08aba5..49cefb973f4d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
@@ -307,9 +307,6 @@ static int idpf_del_flow_steer(struct net_device 
*netdev,

  vport_config = vport->adapter->vport_config[np->vport_idx];
  user_config = &vport_config->user_config;
-    if (!idpf_sideband_action_ena(vport, fsp))
-    return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
  rule = kzalloc(struct_size(rule, rule_info, 1), GFP_KERNEL);
  if (!rule)
  return -ENOMEM;


Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel 


Kind regards,

Paul


Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: Fix flow rule delete failure due to invalid validation

2026-01-16 Thread Paul Menzel

[Cc: +Ahmed Zaki]

Dear Sreedevi,


Thank you for your patch.

Am 13.01.26 um 19:01 schrieb Sreedevi Joshi:

When deleting a flow rule using "ethtool -N  delete ",
idpf_sideband_action_ena() incorrectly validates fsp->ring_cookie even
though ethtool doesn't populate this field for delete operations. The
uninitialized ring_cookie may randomly match RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC or
RX_CLS_FLOW_WAKE, causing validation to fail and preventing legitimate
rule deletions. Remove the unnecessary sideband action enable check and
ring_cookie validation during delete operations since action validation
is not required when removing existing rules.

Fixes: ada3e24b84a0 ("idpf: add flow steering support")
Signed-off-by: Sreedevi Joshi 
Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov 
---
  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c | 3 ---
  1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c 
b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
index 2efa3c08aba5..49cefb973f4d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/idpf/idpf_ethtool.c
@@ -307,9 +307,6 @@ static int idpf_del_flow_steer(struct net_device *netdev,
vport_config = vport->adapter->vport_config[np->vport_idx];
user_config = &vport_config->user_config;
  
-	if (!idpf_sideband_action_ena(vport, fsp))

-   return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
rule = kzalloc(struct_size(rule, rule_info, 1), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!rule)
return -ENOMEM;


Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel 


Kind regards,

Paul


Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH iwl-net] idpf: Fix flow rule delete failure due to invalid validation

2026-01-16 Thread Simon Horman
On Tue, Jan 13, 2026 at 12:01:13PM -0600, Sreedevi Joshi wrote:
> When deleting a flow rule using "ethtool -N  delete ",
> idpf_sideband_action_ena() incorrectly validates fsp->ring_cookie even
> though ethtool doesn't populate this field for delete operations. The
> uninitialized ring_cookie may randomly match RX_CLS_FLOW_DISC or
> RX_CLS_FLOW_WAKE, causing validation to fail and preventing legitimate
> rule deletions. Remove the unnecessary sideband action enable check and
> ring_cookie validation during delete operations since action validation
> is not required when removing existing rules.
> 
> Fixes: ada3e24b84a0 ("idpf: add flow steering support")
> Signed-off-by: Sreedevi Joshi 
> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov 

Thanks,

I agree with your analysis.
And that the problem was introduced by the cited commit.

Reviewed-by: Simon Horman